Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Rpksc Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.3M
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$1.0M
Largest
01What it funds
0187% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$1.3MInternational$834kReligion$260kHuman Services$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k3 grants · $55k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $204k
  • $250k+1 grant · $1.0M
$100,500
Median grant
3
States reached
$666k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
VALOR PREPARATORY ACADEMY$1,000,000
US ISRAEL EDUCATION ASSOCIATION$103,036
US ISRAEL EDUCATION ASSOCIATION$100,500
UNITE US$25,000
HAPPY LIFE CHILDRENS HOME INC$20,000
COUNCIL FOR LIFE CENTRAL TEXAS$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–25, $35k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%FAMILY RESEARCH COUNCIL: $10k → 14%UNITE US: $25k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

PA
CA
DE
TN
NC
DC
AL
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.3M · 10 repeat orgs$165k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +20% since the first grant, against +7% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
5

Total granted

$2.3M
$140k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+20%
+7%

Still filing today

50%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
ReligionInternationalHuman ServicesEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • VP
    Valor Preparatory Academy
    6× · 2017–2025 · $1.3M · revenue ×26
  • UI
    US ISRAEL EDUCATION ASSOCIATION INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $444k · revenue +183%
  • HL
    HAPPY LIFE CHILDREN'S HOME INC DBA HAPPY LIFE MISSION
    3× · 2023–2025 · $45k · revenue +2%

Funded once

  • AC
    ANTIOCH COMMUNITY CHURCH BUILDING FUND
    one grant, 2019 · $100k
  • SP
    SAMARITAN'S PURSE
    one grant, 2024 · $20k · revenue 0%
  • FR
    FAMILY RESEARCH COUNCIL
    one grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue +7%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Israel Restoration Ministries
Religion
2
The Jerusalem Connection
—
3
Jehoyah Jireh Usa
International
4
Why Stand With Israel

To educate and inspire the global church to live out its biblical responsibility to stand with israel.

Religion
5
Messianic Jewish Bible Institute Inc

The mjbi educates and empowers messianic jewish believers in yeshua jesus for the prophetic restoration of israel in 7 countries and 21 schools globally. additionally, mjbi educates the church on the jewish roots of christianity through…

—
6
More International Ministries

To spread the gospel of jesus christ through crusades

Religion
7
Sherit Isroel
—
8
Redeemed Christian Church of God

To strengthen marriages and families, to encourage Christian fellowship as we evangelize the lost around us and minister to the needy with the resources God has blessed us.

Religion
9
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
10
The Watchman International Inc

To teach about prayer and Israel.

Religion
11
Jerusalem Seminary

Motivated by the knowledge that the Word of the Lord will go forth from Jerusalem to the Nations, and guided by a commitment to read the New Testament in its first century context, Jerusalem Seminary provides cutting-edge ministry training…

Religion
12
Yeshiva University

The university is composed of several colleges and schools providing undergraduate, graduate, professional and post-doctoral education and training and research and clinical programs.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Light of Zion; the most unlike its peers is Samaritan's Purse. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Valor Preparatory Academy: $1,346,673 · EducationValor Preparatory AcademyUS ISRAEL EDUCATION ASSOCIATION INC: $443,536 · InternationalUS ISRAEL EDUCATION AS…HAPPY LIFE CHILDREN'S HOME INC DBA HAPPY LIFE MISSION: $45,000 · InternationalHAPPY LIFE CHILDREN'S …JH ISRAEL: $325,000 · ReligionJH ISRAELSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $20,000 · ReligionSAMARITAN'S PURS…LIGHT OF ZION: $20,000 · ReligionLIGHT OF ZIONANTIOCH COMMUNITY CHURCH BUILDING FUND: $100,000 · OtherANTIOCH COM…ANTIOCH MINISTRIES INTERNATIONAL: $70,000 · OtherANTIOCH MIN…COUNCIL FOR LIFE CENTRAL TEXAS: $25,000 · OtherCOUNCIL FOR…MAOZ ISRAEL: $25,000 · OtherMAOZ ISRAELWELL VERSED INC: $15,000 · OtherWELL VERSED…CHRIST THE KING CHURCH: $10,000 · Other+2 more: $10,000 · OtherUNITEUS INC: $25,000 · Human ServicesFAMILY RESEARCH COUNCIL: $10,000 · Human Services
Education$1,346,673International$488,536Religion$365,000Other$255,000Human Services$35,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetValor Preparatory Academy: $1,346,673 over 6y, 7.5% of budgetUS ISRAEL EDUCATION ASSOCIATION INC: $443,536 over 4y, 4.8% of budgetJH ISRAEL: $325,000 over 2y, 7.1% of budgetHAPPY LIFE CHILDREN'S HOME INC DBA HAPPY LIFE MISSION: $45,000 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLIGHT OF ZION: $20,000 over 3y, 3.8% of budgetFAMILY RESEARCH COUNCIL: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Valor Preparatory Academy ↗
  • Who funds US ISRAEL EDUCATION ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds JH ISRAEL ↗
  • Who funds HAPPY LIFE CHILDREN'S HOME INC DBA HAPPY LIFE MISSION ↗
  • Who funds UNITEUS INC ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
  • Who funds LIGHT OF ZION ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY RESEARCH COUNCIL ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust IncIN13.5× affinity7 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Rpksc Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Rpksc Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Rpksc Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph