Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Roy and Gretta Hogan Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$158k
Granted FY2025still arriving
18
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$34k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$426kReligion$204kHealth$161kYouth Development$121kRecreation & Sports$110kHuman Services$75kHousing & Shelter$74kPhilanthropy$34kOther$0
02FY2025 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k12 grants · $49k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $109k
$5,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$2.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Homeless No More$34,000
Vernon College Foundation$20,000
Midwestern State University$20,000
Park Place Christian Church$15,000
MSU Athletic Club$10,000
Midwestern State University FCA$10,000
Interfaith Outreach Services$6,000
Boys Girls Club of Sandhills NC$5,000
Hands to Hands Community Fund$5,000
Wichita Falls Faith Mission Inc$5,000
Kappa Alpha Order Educational Found$5,000
The Formation Project$5,000
Genesis Place dba Straight Street$5,000
Wichita Falls Area Community Founda$3,000
Rathgeber Hospitality House$3,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $165k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 36% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Hospice of Wichita Falls: $100k → 9%Pat Green Foundation: $5k → 11%American Red Cross: $3k → 14%American Red Cross: $3k → 14%Young Mens Christian Association of: $25k → 16%Genesis Place dba Straight Street: $5k → 16%Genesis Place dba Straight Street: $5k → 16%Young Mens Christian Association of: $5k → 16%Genesis Place dba Straight Street: $5k → 16%Genesis Place dba Straight Street: $5k → 16%The Arc of Wichita County: $5k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.1M · 23 repeat orgs$185k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +59% since the first grant, against +25% for those funded once.

23 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
10

Total granted

$1.1M
$131k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+59%
+25%

Still filing today

61%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 65% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $54k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesReligionHealthYouth DevelopmentArts & CultureHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • VC
    VERNON COLLEGE FOUNDATION INCORPORATED
    9× · 2017–2025 · $180k · revenue +2%
  • WF
    WICHITA FALLS FAITH MISSION INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $40k · revenue +264%
  • NC
    North Central Texas Community Health Care Center
    2× · 2017–2024 · $35k · revenue +126%

Funded once

  • HO
    Hospice of Wichita Falls Incgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $100k · revenue +25%
  • HO
    HOUSE OF MERCY ENTERPRISES LLC
    one grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue +5%
  • IM
    Interfaith Ministries Inc
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Compassion Ministries of Waco

It is the mission of the organization to provide services to disadvantaged and homeless families with children; to reintegrate homeless families with children into permanent housing and employment.

Community Improvement
2
Wichita Family Crisis Center

Formerly ywca wichita, the wichita family crisis center (wfcc) began operations in wichita, ks in 1907. wfcc's mission is to eliminate domestic violence in our community by supporting survivors through shelter, education & advocacy.

Human Services
3
Interfaith Ministries of Wichita Falls Inc Dba Interfaith Outreach Services

The primary purpose of the organization is to provide assistance to temporarily disadvantaged individuals and families.

Human Services
4
Wichita Habitat for Humanity Inc

At wichita habitat for humanity, we believe everyone deserves the strength, stability, and independence that comes with a safe, affordable home. we partner with hardworking individuals and families in our community, empowering them to…

Housing & Shelter
5
Wichita Adore Ministries

Bringing souls face to face with the Eucharistic Heart of Jesus Christ and forming missionaries of the New Evangelization. The organization has realized this mission by providing music and production services for worship events.

Religion
6
North Texas Christian Foundation

National Christian Foundation North Texas (NCFNT) was created to facilitate smarter Christian giving with sophisticated charitable techniques.

Philanthropy
7
Waco Habitat for Humanity

Seeking to put god's love into action, habitat for humanity brings people together to build homes, communities, and hope to realize our vision of a world where everyone has a decent place to live. waco habitat for humanity adheres to a…

Housing & Shelter
8
West Michigan Christian Foundation

None

Religion
9
Found in Faith Ministries Inc Dba Fresh Start Furnishings

We provide furniture and home goods to families and individuals that financially qualify for our program. our current focus area is harford county, maryland but are happy to give referrals to resources in other counties when possible.

Human Services
10
Wichita Falls Retirement Foundation

Love and caring are the center of life at Rolling Meadows. Rolling Meadows was founded on the biblical belief that each person's life is a gift from God and is meant to be lived in dignity, comfort and security. Rolling Meadows seeks to…

—
11
Western Fairfax Christian Ministries

To provide food and financial support for persons at risk of hunger and homelessness living in western Fairfax County Virginia.

Human Services
12
Kansas Family Foundation

Our goal is to come alongside the church in its gospel-first mission to transform lives and transform culture.

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wichita Falls Faith Mission Inc; the most unlike its peers is North Central Texas Community Health Care Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/23
Grantees still filing
19/23
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

VERNON COLLEGE FOUNDATION INCORPORATED: $180,000 · OtherVERNON COLLEGE FOUNDATION INCORPORATEDMidwestern State University: $180,000 · OtherMidwestern State UniversityPARK PLACE CHRISTIAN CHURCH: $145,000 · OtherPARK PLACE CHRISTIAN CHURCHMSU Athletic Club: $85,000 · OtherMSU Athletic ClubKappa Alpha Order Educational Found: $70,000 · OtherKappa Alpha Order Educational FoundBoys Girls Club of Wichita Falls: $50,000 · OtherBoys Girls Club of Wichita FallsInterfaith Outreach Services: $47,000 · OtherInterfaith Outreach Services+14 more: $114,500 · Other+14 moreHospice of Wichita Falls Inc: $100,000 · Human ServicesHospice of Wichi…THE GENESIS PLACE INC: $33,500 · Human ServicesTHE GENESIS PLAC…YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SOUTHEAST TEXAS: $30,000 · Human ServicesYOUNG MEN'S CHRI…+4 more: $20,000 · Human Services+4 moreHANDS TO HANDS COMMUNITY FUND: $35,000 · PhilanthropyWichita Falls Area Community Foundation: $33,500 · PhilanthropyNorth Central Texas Community Health Care Center: $35,000 · HealthRathgeber Hospitality House: $20,500 · HealthWICHITA FALLS FAITH MISSION INC: $40,000 · Religion+1 more: $1,000 · ReligionHomeless No More Inc: $34,000 · Housing & ShelterHOUSE OF MERCY ENTERPRISES LLC: $5,000 · Housing & ShelterYOUNG LIFE: $15,000 · Youth DevelopmentFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $15,000 · Youth Development
Other$871,500Human Services$183,500Philanthropy$68,500Health$55,500Religion$41,000Housing & Shelter$39,000Youth Development$30,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetVERNON COLLEGE FOUNDATION INCORPORATED: $180,000 over 9y, 15% of budgetHospice of Wichita Falls Inc: $100,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetWICHITA FALLS FAITH MISSION INC: $40,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetNorth Central Texas Community Health Care Center: $35,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHANDS TO HANDS COMMUNITY FUND: $35,000 over 7y, 0.8% of budgetWichita Falls Area Community Foundation: $33,500 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetTHE GENESIS PLACE INC: $33,500 over 8y, 2.1% of budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SOUTHEAST TEXAS: $30,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetPatsy's House Children's Advocacy Center: $24,000 over 8y, 0.8% of budgetProject Back to School: $23,000 over 9y, 47% of budgetRathgeber Hospitality House: $20,500 over 7y, 0.7% of budgetYOUNG LIFE: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetArts Council Wichita Falls Area Inc: $12,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHOUSE OF MERCY ENTERPRISES LLC: $5,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetTHE ARC OF WICHITA COUNTY INC: $5,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetTHE PAT GREEN FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetHE FOUND ME MINISTRIES INC: $2,500 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetMiddleton Place Foundation: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHRIST COUNSELING MINISTRY INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds VERNON COLLEGE FOUNDATION INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds Hospice of Wichita Falls Inc ↗
  • Who funds WICHITA FALLS FAITH MISSION INC ↗
  • Who funds North Central Texas Community Health Care Center ↗
  • Who funds HANDS TO HANDS COMMUNITY FUND ↗
  • Who funds Homeless No More Inc ↗
  • Who funds Wichita Falls Area Community Foundation ↗
  • Who funds THE GENESIS PLACE INC ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SOUTHEAST TEXAS ↗
  • Who funds Patsy's House Children's Advocacy Center ↗
  • Who funds Project Back to School ↗
  • Who funds Rathgeber Hospitality House ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG LIFE ↗
  • Who funds FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES ↗
  • Who funds Arts Council Wichita Falls Area Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE FORMATION PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds HOUSE OF MERCY ENTERPRISES LLC ↗
  • Who funds THE ARC OF WICHITA COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds THE PAT GREEN FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HE FOUND ME MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds Middleton Place Foundation ↗
  • Who funds CHRIST COUNSELING MINISTRY INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

James N McCoy FoundationTX30.5× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: James N McCoy Foundation · Wichita Falls Area Community Foundation · J S Bridwell Foundation · The Fain Foundation · Bryant Edwards Foundation Inc · Leota Steed Foundation · Gene Conley Foundation · Guinn Foundation Inc · Perkins-Prothro Foundation · The Priddy Foundation · Julia Lee Taubert Foundation · Joe & Nan Johnson Family Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Roy and Gretta Hogan Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Roy and Gretta Hogan Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Roy and Gretta Hogan Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Roy and Gretta Hogan Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 38 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Roy and Gretta Hogan’s filings →

    More from the funding graph