· Private foundation
The Roy and Gretta Hogan Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k12 grants · $49k
- $10k–50k6 grants · $109k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Homeless No More | $34,000 |
| Vernon College Foundation | $20,000 |
| Midwestern State University | $20,000 |
| Park Place Christian Church | $15,000 |
| Midwestern State University FCA | $10,000 |
| MSU Athletic Club | $10,000 |
| Interfaith Outreach Services | $6,000 |
| Kappa Alpha Order Educational Found | $5,000 |
| Boys Girls Club of Sandhills NC | $5,000 |
| Hands to Hands Community Fund | $5,000 |
| Wichita Falls Faith Mission Inc | $5,000 |
| Genesis Place dba Straight Street | $5,000 |
| The Formation Project | $5,000 |
| Wichita Falls Area Community Founda | $3,000 |
| Rathgeber Hospitality House | $3,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $165k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 36% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +59% since the first grant, against +25% for the ones you funded once.
23 repeat relationships — 13 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 65% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $54k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- VCVERNON COLLEGE FOUNDATION INCORPORATED9× · 2017–2025 · $180k · revenue +2%
- WFWICHITA FALLS FAITH MISSION INC8× · 2017–2025 · $40k · revenue +264%
- HTHANDS TO HANDS COMMUNITY FUND7× · 2017–2025 · $35k · revenue +12%
Funded once
- HOHospice of Wichita Falls Incgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $100k · revenue +25%
- TPTHE PAT GREEN FOUNDATIONgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue +87%
- HOHOUSE OF MERCY ENTERPRISES LLCone grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue +5%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
It is the mission of the organization to provide services to disadvantaged and homeless families with children; to reintegrate homeless families with children into permanent housing and employment.
Formerly ywca wichita, the wichita family crisis center (wfcc) began operations in wichita, ks in 1907. wfcc's mission is to eliminate domestic violence in our community by supporting survivors through shelter, education & advocacy.
The primary purpose of the organization is to provide assistance to temporarily disadvantaged individuals and families.
At wichita habitat for humanity, we believe everyone deserves the strength, stability, and independence that comes with a safe, affordable home. we partner with hardworking individuals and families in our community, empowering them to…
Bringing souls face to face with the Eucharistic Heart of Jesus Christ and forming missionaries of the New Evangelization. The organization has realized this mission by providing music and production services for worship events.
National Christian Foundation North Texas (NCFNT) was created to facilitate smarter Christian giving with sophisticated charitable techniques.
Seeking to put god's love into action, habitat for humanity brings people together to build homes, communities, and hope to realize our vision of a world where everyone has a decent place to live. waco habitat for humanity adheres to a…
None
We provide furniture and home goods to families and individuals that financially qualify for our program. our current focus area is harford county, maryland but are happy to give referrals to resources in other counties when possible.
Love and caring are the center of life at Rolling Meadows. Rolling Meadows was founded on the biblical belief that each person's life is a gift from God and is meant to be lived in dignity, comfort and security. Rolling Meadows seeks to…
To provide food and financial support for persons at risk of hunger and homelessness living in western Fairfax County Virginia.
Our goal is to come alongside the church in its gospel-first mission to transform lives and transform culture.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wichita Falls Faith Mission Inc and the most unlike its peers is North Central Texas Community Health Care Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 36 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 27% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 16% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds VERNON COLLEGE FOUNDATION INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds Hospice of Wichita Falls Inc ↗
- Who funds WICHITA FALLS FAITH MISSION INC ↗
- Who funds HANDS TO HANDS COMMUNITY FUND ↗
- Who funds North Central Texas Community Health Care Center ↗
- Who funds Homeless No More Inc ↗
- Who funds THE GENESIS PLACE INC ↗
- Who funds Wichita Falls Area Community Foundation ↗
- Who funds YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SOUTHEAST TEXAS ↗
- Who funds Patsy's House Children's Advocacy Center ↗
- Who funds Project Back to School ↗
- Who funds Rathgeber Hospitality House ↗
- Who funds FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES ↗
- Who funds YOUNG LIFE ↗
- Who funds Arts Council Wichita Falls Area Inc ↗
- Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
- Who funds THE PAT GREEN FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HOUSE OF MERCY ENTERPRISES LLC ↗
- Who funds THE FORMATION PROJECT ↗
- Who funds THE ARC OF WICHITA COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds HE FOUND ME MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds Middleton Place Foundation ↗
- Who funds CHRIST COUNSELING MINISTRY INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: James N McCoy Foundation · Wichita Falls Area Community Foundation · J S Bridwell Foundation · The Fain Foundation · Bryant Edwards Foundation Inc · Leota Steed Foundation · Gene Conley Foundation · Guinn Foundation Inc · Perkins-Prothro Foundation · The Priddy Foundation · Julia Lee Taubert Foundation · Joe & Nan Johnson Family Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Roy and Gretta Hogan Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Roy and Gretta Hogan Foundation?
Find your warmest path to The Roy and Gretta Hogan Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.