· Private foundation
Julia Lee Taubert Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k16 grants · $55k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $41k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF WICHITA FALLS | $22,000 |
| MIDWESTERN STATE UNIVERSITY | $19,000 |
| CHRIST CHURCH NWA | $7,500 |
| ST JAMES EPISCOPAL CHURCH | $6,000 |
| MONTAGUE COWBOY CHURCH | $5,000 |
| HANDS TO HANDS | $4,000 |
| FAITH MISSION | $3,000 |
| CASA OF RED RIVER | $3,000 |
| WICHITA FALLS AREA FOOD BANK | $3,000 |
| RATHGEBER HOSPUTALITY HOUSE | $3,000 |
| STRAIGHT STREET | $3,000 |
| PATSY'S HOUSE CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY HOUSE | $3,000 |
| FIRST STEP INC | $3,000 |
| ARCH OF WICHITA COUNTY | $3,000 |
| TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION | $2,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $33k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 80% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +32% since the first grant, against +14% for the ones you funded once.
19 repeat relationships — 17 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- RHRathgeber Hospitality House4× · 2020–2024 · $15k · revenue +32%
- WFWICHITA FALLS AREA FOOD BANK3× · 2022–2024 · $13k · revenue +6%
- SPSPASTIC PARAPLEGIA FOUNDATION INC5× · 2020–2024 · $13k · revenue +86%
Funded once
- NCNorth Central Texas Community Health Care Centerone grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue +24%
- SBSHRINERS BURN HOSPITALone grant, 2020 · $4k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2021 · $4k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The WTFB exists to collect, purchase, and distribute food to feed the hungry in 19 counties in West Texas in partnership with volunteers and community organizations and to educate these partners and the public at large about the real face…
To procure and distribute nutritional food to qualified agencies that feed the hungry of West Central Texas.
Support of special needs military or first responders and their families.
The north texas pantry has been serving the people of north texas since 1979, as an outreach of floral heights united methodist church. in 2015, the pantry formed as a separate 501 (c) 3, the floral heights community food pantry. to better…
The mission of the Wichita Falls Area Community Foundation is to enhance the quality of life in the Wichita Falls area through the promotion and support of charitable giving. Our vision is to build strong, vibrant communities inspired by…
Firefighter & emergency medical services for the waskom, tx area.
Formerly ywca wichita, the wichita family crisis center (wfcc) began operations in wichita, ks in 1907. wfcc's mission is to eliminate domestic violence in our community by supporting survivors through shelter, education & advocacy.
The Texas Nonprofit Hospice Alliance (TNPHA) is a group of nonprofit hospices dedicated to sharing best practices and providing quality care for individuals with life-limiting illnesses.
To provide christ-centered programs and services that lead the homeless toward self-sufficiency.
To operate nonprofit hospitals or hospital facilities, clinics, and related medical and surgical services by providing such services to persons that do have the ability to pay, and to thereby provide charitable medical, surgical, and…
The Organizations mission is to bring unity and efficiency to investigations of child abuse through the use of a multi-disciplinary team and, thereby, to provide the best possible services to victims of child abuse and their families.
The organization is dedicated to providing quality, comprehensive services to pregnant women, infants, and toddlers. teaming with other agencies enables them to help each child and family achieve social competency. early head start…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wounded Warrior Project Inc and the most unlike its peers is Nocona Rural Volunteer Fire Department Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Rathgeber Hospitality House ↗
- Who funds WICHITA FALLS AREA FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds SPASTIC PARAPLEGIA FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE ARC OF WICHITA COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds Patsy's House Children's Advocacy Center ↗
- Who funds FIRST STEP OF WICHITA FALLS INC ↗
- Who funds NOCONA RURAL VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT INC ↗
- Who funds Hospice of Wichita Falls Inc ↗
- Who funds North Central Texas Community Health Care Center ↗
- Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
- Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF ABILENE ↗
- Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds NOCONA MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds Project Back to School ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Leota Steed Foundation · James N McCoy Foundation · Wichita Falls Area Community Foundation · Guinn Foundation Inc · The Fain Foundation · The Priddy Foundation · The Roy and Gretta Hogan Foundation · Gene Conley Foundation · Donnell Foundation · Bryant Edwards Foundation Inc · J S Bridwell Foundation · Kadane Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Julia Lee Taubert Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Wounded Warrior Project Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Julia Lee Taubert Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Julia Lee Taubert Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.