Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Rose Family Fdn Dtd 12232010 Xxxxx4008

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$466k
Granted FY2024still arriving
16
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$75k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Human Services$1.2MReligion$1.0MHousing & Shelter$731kYouth Development$181kEducation$174kHealth$110kArts & Culture$95kFood & Nutrition$85kOther$0
02FY2024 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k4 grants · $21k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $105k
  • $50k–250k6 grants · $340k
$25,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$9.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF FORT$75,000
COMPASS CHRISTIAN CHURCH$65,000
XO MARRIAGE$50,000
MARBLE FALLS INCLUSIVE PLAY GROUP$50,000
LIONHEART CHILDREN'S ACADEMY$50,000
FOCUS ON THE FAMILY$50,000
PRESBYTERIAN NIGHT SHELTER$25,000
WEST DALLAS COMMUNITY SCHOOL$25,000
HOPE FARM$20,000
GENESIS WOMENS SHELTER AND$15,000
UNION GOSPEL MISSION$10,000
PERFORMING ARTS FORT WORTH INC$10,000
FOUNDATION FOR THE CALLIER CENTER$8,000
THE OAK HILL ACADEMY$5,000
FRIENDSHIP MINISTRIES$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $238k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%HIS STORY COACHING AND COUNSELING: $15k → 11%HIS STORY COACHING and COUNSELING: $10k → 11%GRAPEVINE RELIEF AND COMMUNITY EXCHANGE: $10k → 11%GRAPEVINE RELIEF AND COMMUNITY EXCHANGE: $10k → 11%HIS STORY COACHING AND COUNSELING: $10k → 11%FAMILY PLACE INC: $18k → 14%FAMILY PLACE INC: $10k → 14%CITYSQUARE: $15k → 14%CITYSQUARE: $10k → 14%CENTER FOR TRANSFORMING LIVES: $12k → 11%HOPE FARM: $23k → 11%HOPE FARM: $20k → 11%HOPE FARM: $10k → 11%HOPE FARM: $10k → 11%HOPE FARM: $10k → 11%HOPE FARM: $5k → 11%CORNERSTONE ASSISTANCE NETWORK INC: $20k → 11%CORNERSTONE ASSISTANCE NETWORK INC: $15k → 11%BRIGHTER OUTLOOK INC: $5k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.3M · 26 repeat orgs$460k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +58% since the first grant, against +10% for those funded once.

26 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2024, 15 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

26
15

Total granted

$3.3M
$255k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+58%
+10%

Still filing today

54%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 56% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $205k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationArts & CultureReligionYouth DevelopmentHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TP
    THE PRESBYTERIAN NIGHT SHELTER OF TARRANT COUNTY
    8× · 2017–2024 · $195k · revenue +1%
  • SM
    SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL FOUNDATION
    2× · 2019–2023 · $100k · revenue +259%
  • HF
    HOPE FARM INC
    6× · 2018–2024 · $78k · revenue +106%

Funded once

  • AE
    AMERICAN ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE
    one grant, 2019 · $50k
  • TS
    THE SALVATION ARMY
    one grant, 2017 · $50k
  • CC
    CHILD CARE ASSOCIATES
    one grant, 2023 · $25k · revenue 0%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
FIRST3YEARS

First3years nurtures early relational and mental health of infants and toddlers in texas. working in deep collaboration with caregivers, parents, and professionals statewide, we cultivate strong early childhood systems, educate our…

—
2
Trinity Charter School

The trinity charter schools system has 11 campuses in texas. all 11 campuses work with youth who have emotional difficulties, and need active engagement in planning and guiding their own academic careers through student led credit…

Education
3
Dallas International University

As a christian university, we provide education and research opportunities preparing global leaders to partner with local communities.

Education
4
Leadership Austin

Leadership austin connects and develops leaders to courageously engage and transform our communities.

Youth Development
5
North Texas Christian Foundation

National Christian Foundation North Texas (NCFNT) was created to facilitate smarter Christian giving with sophisticated charitable techniques.

Philanthropy
6
Texas Tribune Inc

The texas tribune promotes civic engagement and public education across the state by producing and sharing for free public data interactives, statewide events and intensive and daily reporting on texas public policy, politics and current…

Education
7
Colleyville Covenant Christian

The mission is to provide a biblically based classical college preparatory education that inspires a passion for excellence a heart of grace and the character of Christ.

Education
8
Feeding Texas

To lead a unified effort for a hunger-free texas.

Community Improvement
9
Truth Academy Inc

Truth academy works in partnership with families to integrate high-quality education with biblical truth and discipleship in order to train students, spiritually and academically, how to operate in their god-given purpose and live out a…

Religion
10
Progress Texas

Progress Texas is a non-profit media organization advocating for progressive ideals and policies in our state.

Civil Rights
11
Texprotects-the Texas Association for the Protection of Children

TexProtects advances public policy and local implementation to strenghten families to prevent child abuse and neglect.

Youth Development
12
Dallas Christian School

Dallas Christian is a college preparatory school committed to Biblical values where students are prepared for Christ-centered lives of purpose, service and leadership.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Foundation of North Texas (Tax; the most unlike its peers is Oak Hill Academy. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

31 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 31 of the 48 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
30/31
Grantees still filing
24/31
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PROJECT HANDUP: $1,028,914 · OtherPROJECT HANDUPCOMPASS CHRISTIAN CHURCH: $925,000 · OtherCOMPASS CHRISTIAN CHURCHBRYANS HOUSE: $156,000 · OtherBRYANS HOUSEFOCUS ON THE FAMILY: $100,000 · Other+25 more: $679,600 · Other+25 moreHOPE FARM INC: $78,000 · Human ServicesGRAPEVINE RELIEF AND COMMUNITY EXCHANGE: $65,000 · Human ServicesCORNERSTONE ASSISTANCE NETWORK INC: $35,000 · Human ServicesHIS STORY COACHING AND COUNSELING: $35,000 · Human ServicesThe Family Place: $27,500 · Human ServicesCITYSQUARE: $25,000 · Human ServicesCENTER FOR TRANSFORMING LIVES: $12,000 · Human Services+1 more: $5,000 · Human ServicesTHE PRESBYTERIAN NIGHT SHELTER OF TARRANT COUNTY: $195,000 · Housing & ShelterSOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL FOUNDATION: $100,000 · EducationOak Hill Academy: $45,850 · EducationWEST DALLAS COMMUNITY SCHOOL: $25,000 · EducationMarriage Today: $51,000 · ReligionLIONHEART CHILDREN'S ACADEMY: $50,000 · ReligionPERFORMING ARTS FORT WORTH INC: $75,000 · Arts & CultureVan Cliburn Foundation Inc: $20,000 · Arts & CultureNATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST: $46,570 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NORTH TEXAS (TAX: $10,000 · PhilanthropyEL DORADO FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · Philanthropy
Other$2,889,514Human Services$282,500Housing & Shelter$195,000Education$170,850Religion$101,000Arts & Culture$95,000Philanthropy$66,570

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE PRESBYTERIAN NIGHT SHELTER OF TARRANT COUNTY: $195,000 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetSOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL FOUNDATION: $100,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHOPE FARM INC: $78,000 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetPERFORMING ARTS FORT WORTH INC: $75,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetGRAPEVINE RELIEF AND COMMUNITY EXCHANGE: $65,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetMarriage Today: $51,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLIONHEART CHILDREN'S ACADEMY: $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMARBLE FALLS INCLUSIVE PLAY GROUP: $50,000 over 1y, 24% of budgetNATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST: $46,570 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOak Hill Academy: $45,850 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetTarrant Area Food Bank: $45,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF AMERICA: $40,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCORNERSTONE ASSISTANCE NETWORK INC: $35,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetNEW FRIENDS NEW LIFE: $35,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetHIS STORY COACHING AND COUNSELING: $35,000 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetThe Family Place: $27,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWEST DALLAS COMMUNITY SCHOOL: $25,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetCITYSQUARE: $25,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCHILD CARE ASSOCIATES: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCAFE MOMENTUM: $15,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetAUSTIN STREET CENTER: $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCENTER FOR TRANSFORMING LIVES: $12,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLEGACY EARLY LEARNING ACADEMY: $10,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NORTH TEXAS (TAX: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEL DORADO FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetFRIENDSHIP MINISTRIES: $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetOPTIMIST CLUB OF FORT WORTH: $2,500 over 1y, 14% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE PRESBYTERIAN NIGHT SHELTER OF TARRANT COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HOPE FARM INC ↗
  • Who funds PERFORMING ARTS FORT WORTH INC ↗
  • Who funds GRAPEVINE RELIEF AND COMMUNITY EXCHANGE ↗
  • Who funds Marriage Today ↗
  • Who funds LIONHEART CHILDREN'S ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds MARBLE FALLS INCLUSIVE PLAY GROUP ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST ↗
  • Who funds Oak Hill Academy ↗
  • Who funds Tarrant Area Food Bank ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds CORNERSTONE ASSISTANCE NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW FRIENDS NEW LIFE ↗
  • Who funds HIS STORY COACHING AND COUNSELING ↗
  • Who funds The Family Place ↗
  • Who funds WEST DALLAS COMMUNITY SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds CITYSQUARE ↗
  • Who funds CHILD CARE ASSOCIATES ↗
  • Who funds Van Cliburn Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds NORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds CAFE MOMENTUM ↗
  • Who funds AUSTIN STREET CENTER ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR TRANSFORMING LIVES ↗
  • Who funds LEGACY EARLY LEARNING ACADEMY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Sid W Richardson FoundationTX24.1× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Sid W Richardson Foundation · Amon G Carter Foundation · Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · The Dallas Foundation · Textron Charitable Trust Dtd 122353 · Bnsf Railway Foundation · Adeline & George McQueen Foundation Xxxxx1007 · Mary Potishman Lard Trust Walker C Friedman Co Trustee · Ann L Rhodes and Carol Greene Rhodes · Thomas M Helen McKee & John P Ryan Fo John P Ryan Foundation Inc · The Rees-Jones Foundation · Rainwater Charitable Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Rose Family Fdn Dtd 12232010 Xxxxx4008 funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Rose Family Fdn Dtd 12232010 Xxxxx4008. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Rose Family Fdn Dtd 12232010 Xxxxx4008?

    Find your warmest path to The Rose Family Fdn Dtd 12232010 Xxxxx4008 through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 48 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Rose Family Fdn Dtd 12232010 Xxxxx4008’s filings →

    More from the funding graph