Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Robert M Abramson Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$28k
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$6k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$124kReligion$35kEducation$6kFood & Nutrition$4kHuman Services$2kPhilanthropy$1kOther$0
02FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$4,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$577k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE DALCROZE CENTER$6,000
BARNERT TEMPLE$6,000
INTERNATIONAL WINE FOOD SOCIETY FDT$4,000
FRACTURED ATLAS$4,000
ISADORA DUNCAN DANCE COMPANY$3,000
SOUTHAMPTON CULTURAL CENTER$2,500
DALCROZE SOCIETY OF AMERICA-NY CHAP$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–19, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%ROOTS AND WINGS FOUNDATION: $2k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$159k · 10 repeat orgs$27k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +47% since the first grant, against +3% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
9

Total granted

$159k
$21k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+47%
+3%

Still filing today

20%
56%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CulturePhilanthropyCommunity ImprovementHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TD
    The Dalcroze Center
    6× · 2017–2024 · $37k
  • BM
    BARNERT MEMORIAL TEMPLE
    8× · 2017–2024 · $35k
  • FA
    FRACTURED ATLAS OUTREACH PROGRAM
    3× · 2017–2021 · $18k

Funded once

  • DP
    DOME PROJECT INC
    one grant, 2017 · $4k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $4k
  • AU
    ARTS UNBOUND INC
    one grant, 2018 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New York City Center Inc

The mission of new york city center is to be new york city's leading center for dance and musical theater. dedicated to making the arts accessible to the broadest possible audience, city center seeks to create a welcoming environment and…

Arts & Culture
2
The Bronx Council On the Arts Incorporated

A pioneering advocate for cultural equity, the bronx council on the arts nurtures the development of diverse artists and arts organizations and build strong cultural connections in and beyond the bronx.

Arts & Culture
3
United States Artists Inc

To invest in america's finest artists and illuminate the value of artists to society.

Arts & Culture
4
Roosevelt Row Community Development Corporation

To advance arts-focused initiatives for artists, entrepreneurs and residents, cultivating creative space within a sustainable roosevelt row arts district

Community Improvement
5
Performance Space 122 Inc

See schedule operformance space new york is committed to promoting the arts (including performance, visual and all other contemporary arts), fostering artistic development (including through direct grants), advancing diversity in the field…

Arts & Culture
6
North Carolina Symphony Society Inc

To be north carolina's state orchestra, an orchestra achieving the highest level of artistic quality and performance standards, and embracing its dual legacies of statewide service and music education.

Arts & Culture
7
Artsfund

Artsfund strengthens the community by supporting the arts through leadership, advocacy, and grant making.

Arts & Culture
8
Arts On Site Nyc Inc

To support artists of all disciplines by offering affordable studio rental space and a diverse calendar of classes, events, and workshops.

Arts & Culture
9
New York Foundation for the Arts Inc

Established in 1971, the mission of the new york foundation for the arts (nyfa) is to empower artists in all disciplines, as well as cultural workers, to achieve success on their own terms by providing critical support, resources, and…

Arts & Culture
10
Museum of Arts and Design

To collect, display and interpret objects in craft art and design.

Arts & Culture
11
Los Angeles Opera Company

To serve the public by producing world-class opera that preserves, promotes and advances the art form while embodying the diversity, spirit and artistic sensibility unique to los angeles. we envision an engaged and enlightened community in…

Arts & Culture
12
Lawyers for the Creative Arts

Provision of pro bono legal and consulting services to qualifying individuals/companies in the creative arts.

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Socrates Sculpture Park Inc; the most unlike its peers is Redwood Credit Union Community Fund Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

The Dalcroze Center: $36,500 · OtherThe Dalcroze CenterBARNERT MEMORIAL TEMPLE: $35,000 · OtherBARNERT MEMORIAL TEMPLEFRACTURED ATLAS OUTREACH PROGRAM: $17,500 · OtherFRACTURED ATLAS OUTREACH PROGRAMKEHILAT ROMEMU: $15,000 · OtherKEHILAT ROMEMUSOUTHAMPTON CULTURAL CENTER: $12,000 · OtherSOUTHAMPTON CULTURAL CENTERDALCROZE SOCIETY OF AMERICA: $10,500 · OtherDALCROZE SOCIETY OF AMERICATHE ISADORA DUNCAN DANCE CO: $9,000 · OtherTHE ISADORA DUNCAN DANCE COISADORA DUNCAN DANCE COMPANY: $6,000 · Other+6 more: $19,500 · Other+6 moreBCT BROOKLYN CHILDREN'S THEATRE INC: $9,500 · Arts & CultureBCT BROOKLY…FRACTURED ATLAS INC: $8,000 · Arts & CultureFRACTURED A…ZAMIR CHORAL FOUNDATION INC: $1,800 · Arts & CultureZAMIR CHORA…+1 more: $250 · Arts & CultureSOCRATES SCULPTURE PARK INC: $3,000 · Community ImprovementROOTS & WINGS FOUNDATION: $1,500 · Human ServicesREDWOOD CREDIT UNION COMMUNITY FUND INC: $1,000 · Philanthropy
Other$161,000Arts & Culture$19,550Community Improvement$3,000Human Services$1,500Philanthropy$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBCT BROOKLYN CHILDREN'S THEATRE INC: $9,500 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetFRACTURED ATLAS INC: $8,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetARTS UNBOUND INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetSOCRATES SCULPTURE PARK INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetZAMIR CHORAL FOUNDATION INC: $1,800 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetROOTS & WINGS FOUNDATION: $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetREDWOOD CREDIT UNION COMMUNITY FUND INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE PHILHARMONIC SYMPHONY SOCIETY OF NY INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BCT BROOKLYN CHILDREN'S THEATRE INC ↗
  • Who funds FRACTURED ATLAS INC ↗
  • Who funds DOME PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds ARTS UNBOUND INC ↗
  • Who funds SOCRATES SCULPTURE PARK INC ↗
  • Who funds ZAMIR CHORAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ROOTS & WINGS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds REDWOOD CREDIT UNION COMMUNITY FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds THE PHILHARMONIC SYMPHONY SOCIETY OF NY INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ford FoundationNY14.9× affinity5 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ford Foundation · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · Freelander Family Charitable Trust · Jewish Communal Fund · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Robert M Abramson Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Robert M Abramson Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Robert M Abramson Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to The Robert M Abramson Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Robert M Abramson’s filings →

    More from the funding graph