Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Robert L James and Anne K James Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.9M
Granted FY2024still arriving
17
Grants FY2024still arriving
10
States reached
$1.6M
Largest
01What you fund
0177% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY20172024.

Science & Tech$1.6MEducation$370kHealth$134kAnimals$100kArts & Culture$5kCommunity Improvement$4kHuman Services$1kOther$680k
02FY2024 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k9 grants · $24k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $80k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $150k
  • $250k+1 grant · $1.6M
$5,000
Median grant
10
States reached
$131k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution$1,600,000
Columbia University$100,000
The Animal Medical Center$50,000
Stanford University$20,000
St. Jude Childrens Research Hospital$20,000
Catholic Relief Services$20,000
Cleveland Clinic Foundation$10,000
Johns Hopkins University$10,000
Goucher College$5,000
American Cancer Society Inc$5,000
Winifred Masterson Burke Rehabilitation Hospital$5,000
New York Yacht Club Foundation$2,000
Gregorian University Foundation Inc$2,000
American Heart Association Inc$2,000
The Salvation Army, a Georgia Corporation$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–23) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 98% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%WOODS HOLE OCEANOGRAPHIC INSTITUTION: $10k → 8%Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Jr Univ: $10k → 8%WINIFRED MASTERSON BURKE REHABLITATION HOSPITAL: $1k → 9%COLUMBIA UNIVERISTY: $10k → 17%Smithsonian Institution: $5k → 14%ALSAC - ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL: $5k → 17%THE CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION: $10k → 17%JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $5k → 19%THE SCHWARZMAN ANIMAL MEDICAL CENTER: $50k → 17%THE GREGORIAN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $100k → 14%JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $5k → 19%WEILL CORNELL MEDICINE: $10k → 17%GREGORIAN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $1k → 14%New York-Presbyterian Hospital Fund: $501k → 17%COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY: $100k → 17%COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY: $100k → 17%NEW YORK PRESBYTERIAN FUND: $100k → 17%NEW YORK YACHT CLUB FOUNDATION: $2k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

72%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.9M · 7 repeat orgs$716k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +26% since the first grant, against +5% for the ones you funded once.

7 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
9

Total granted

$1.9M
$656k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+26%
+5%

Still filing today

86%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $60k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’22’24
HealthScience & TechEducationAnimalsArts & CultureCommunity ImprovementOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY
    3× · 2017–2024 · $20k · revenue +64%
  • GC
    GOUCHER COLLEGE
    2× · 2021–2024 · $10k · revenue +26%
  • TW
    The Winifred Masterson Burke Rehabilitation Hospital
    2× · 2022–2024 · $6k · revenue +22%

Funded once

  • NY
    New York-Presbyterian Hospital Fund
    one grant, 2020 · $501k
  • NY
    NEW YORK-PRESBYTERIAN FUND INC
    one grant, 2017 · $100k · revenue -34%
  • WC
    WEILL CORNELL MEDICINE
    one grant, 2017 · $10k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
2
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
3
Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation

The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.

Science & Tech
4
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
5
Howard Hughes Medical Institute

The mission of the institute has remained constant since its founding in 1953. as its restated articles of incorporation state the primary purpose and objective of the howard hughes medical institute shall be the promotion of human…

Health
6
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
7
American Museum of Natural History

The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."

Arts & Culture
8
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center

Fred hutch cancer center ("fred hutch") unites innovative research and compassionate care to prevent and eliminate cancer and infectious disease. continued on schedule o

Health
9
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
10
The Graduate School of the Stowers Institute for Medical Research

The graduate school of the stowers institute for medical research ("gssimr") exempt purpose is to provide graduate education that will prepare scholars for scientific research in the biological sciences.

Education
11
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
12
National Science and Technology Medals Foundation Inc

The nstmf's mission is to build inclusive stem communities across the united states. fundamental to these communities are the significant, inspirational connections we foster between the individuals who have received national recognition…

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is St Jude Children's Research Hospital Inc and the most unlike its peers is Taskforce Fore Ending Homelessness Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 80 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%5%10–20yr16%15%20–35yr13%10%35–55yr16%70%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%0%10–20yr16%6%20–35yr13%13%35–55yr16%81%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/20
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,545

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
12/16
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

WOODS HOLE OCEANOGRAPHIC INSTITUTION — $1,610,000 · Science & TechWOODS HOLE OCEANOGRAPHIC INSTITUTION+1 more — $5,000 · Science & TechNew York-Presbyterian Hospital Fund — $501,430 · OtherNew York-Presbyterian Hosp…GREGORIAN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC — $103,000 · OtherGREGORIAN UNIVERSITY FOUND…+8 more — $76,000 · Other+8 moreTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK — $300,000 · EducationTHE TRUSTEES O…THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY — $40,000 · EducationTHE BOARD OF T…JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY — $20,000 · EducationJOHNS HOPKINS …+1 more — $10,000 · EducationNEW YORK-PRESBYTERIAN FUND INC — $100,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $20,000 · HealthThe Winifred Masterson Burke Rehabilitation Hospital — $6,000 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $5,000 · Health+2 more — $3,000 · HealthTHE ANIMAL MEDICAL CENTER — $100,000 · AnimalsSMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION — $5,000 · Arts & CultureNEW YORK YACHT CLUB FOUNDATION — $4,000 · Community ImprovementTASKFORCE FORE ENDING HOMELESSNESS INC — $1,000 · Human Services
Science & Tech$1,615,000Other$680,430Education$370,000Health$134,000Animals$100,000Arts & Culture$5,000Community Improvement$4,000Human Services$1,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetWOODS HOLE OCEANOGRAPHIC INSTITUTION — $1,610,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK — $300,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNEW YORK-PRESBYTERIAN FUND INC — $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ANIMAL MEDICAL CENTER — $100,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY — $40,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY — $20,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGOUCHER COLLEGE — $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe Winifred Masterson Burke Rehabilitation Hospital — $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEW YORK YACHT CLUB FOUNDATION — $4,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTASKFORCE FORE ENDING HOMELESSNESS INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBRIGHTFOCUS FOUNDATION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust IncIN10.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Robert L James and Anne K James Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 63%
  • Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution63% of income from government
  • Johns Hopkins University12% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Robert L James and Anne K James Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Robert L James and Anne K James Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $400k of grant expense with no grantee named in the published copy. A private foundation itemizes every grant it makes, so a return carrying none has filed its list as an attachment that the public copy does not include. The figures above are therefore from FY2024, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph