Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Robert & Sherry Guth Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$91k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$28k
Largest
01What you fund
0187% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20182025.

Religion$87kHealth$69kEducation$61kHuman Services$54kArts & Culture$41kCommunity Improvement$38kScience & Tech$25kPhilanthropy$19kOther$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $19k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $73k
$5,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$2.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DAVIDSON COLLEGE$27,500
THE RPM FOUNDATION$25,000
POWER CROSS$20,000
FIRST CHURCH FORT PIERCE$5,000
OLD SAINT LUKE'S CHURCH$5,000
THE CHRISTIAN MISSION$3,120
Individual grant recipient$2,500
STEWART SIMMONS VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPT$2,000
NY RACE RUNNERS TEAM FOR KIDS$530
KINDNESS CLOSET$515
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–25, $24k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CHRISTIAN MISSION INC: $10k → 9%CHRISTIAN MISSION INC: $5k → 9%THE CHRISTIAN MISSION: $3k → 9%KINDNESS CLOSET: $6k → 9%KINDNESS CLOSET: $515 → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
MN
IL
WI
NY
PA
NJ
CT
CA
VA
MD
NC
SC
GA
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

62%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$327k · 18 repeat orgs$197k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +46% since the first grant, against +7% for the ones you funded once.

18 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
35

Total granted

$327k
$142k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+46%
+7%

Still filing today

50%
31%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 39% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $56k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthReligionHuman ServicesEmploymentCommunity ImprovementOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Davidson College
    2× · 2023–2025 · $40k · revenue +46%
  • LI
    LaunchLKN Inc
    2× · 2018–2021 · $35k · revenue +247% · 33% of their budget
  • MA
    Mooresville Area Christian Mission Inc
    3× · 2021–2025 · $18k · revenue +164%

Funded once

  • ZF
    ZEKENETIC FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2020 · $25k
  • LL
    LAUNCH LKN DAVIDSON TECH HUB
    one grant, 2019 · $25k
  • SP
    SAMARITAN'S PURSE
    one grant, 2024 · $15k · revenue 0%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Saint Paul & Minnesota Foundation

Purpose: we inspire, advocate and invest to advance community visions. continued on sch o

Philanthropy
2
Disability Rights North Carolina

Disability rights north carolina is a legal advocacy organization that advances and defends the rights of people with all types of disabilities, of all ages, throughout north carolina.

3
Carolina Small Business Development Fund

Our mission is to foster economic development in underserved communities by providing capital, business services, and policy research to support small businesses.

Public Benefit
4
Unc Health Foundation Inc

At unc health foundation, we inspire philanthropic support for unc health and unc school of medicine that transforms healthcare and provides hope to the people of north carolina and communities around the world.

Education
5
Common Future

Common future is a network of pioneering leaders across the u.s. and canada who work deeply within their communities to create alternative approaches to business, philanthropy, and investing. we envision an economy that has transitioned…

Community Improvement
6
Search for Change Inc

Dedicated to improving the quality of life and increasing the self sufficiency of individuals with emotional, social and economic barriers. this is accomplished by providing direct support and assistance needed to enable individuals to…

Human Services
7
Servant Foundation

The Signatry advances the Christian faith by carrying out its mission, "to inspire and facilitate revolutionary biblical generosity across generations to solve the world's greatest problems," through financial and other support of I.R.C.…

Religion
8
Sc Launch Inc

Fuel south carolina's innovation economy by accelerating technology-enabled growth in research, academia, entrepreneurship and industry.

Community Improvement
9
Commonwealth Care Alliance Inc

Commonwealth care alliance, inc.'s mission is to improve the health and well-being of people with significant needs by innovating, coordinating and providing the highest quality, individualized care.

Health
10
Common Impact Inc

Common impact's mission is to strengthen the capacity of social change organizations, enabling them to better run and scale their programs. through its partnership with companies, common impact taps into the business skills and expertise…

Unclassified
11
Families of Spinal Muscular Atrophy Dba Cure Sma

Our mission is to drive research for treatments and a cure for sma, and to support and empower everyone impacted by sma today.

Health
12
Personal Care Products Council Foundation Inc

The foundation is set up to deliver one program - look good feel better. the mission of this nationwide program is to improve the quality of life of women, men, and teens undergoing cancer treatment by offering advice on how to cope with…

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Feed My Starving Children Inc and the most unlike its peers is Samaritan's Purse. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Community Arts OrganizationsFood Pantries & AssistanceCancer Support OrganizationsVolunteer Fire DepartmentsCommunity Health CentersDevelopmental Disabilities …Public University Foundatio…Small Business Development …
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 22 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number26%0%<5yr16%16%5–10yr20%28%10–20yr14%20%20–35yr12%20%35–55yr12%16%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value26%0%<5yr16%7%5–10yr20%36%10–20yr14%20%20–35yr12%13%35–55yr12%24%55yr+

The field is 26% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/27
the rest of the field
15%
7,957/53,153

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 60 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/24
Grantees still filing
15/24
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Individual grant recipient — $75,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientST THERESE CATHOLIC CHURCH — $43,140 · OtherST THERESE CATHOLIC CHURCHZEKENETIC FOUNDATION INC — $25,000 · OtherZEKENETIC FOUNDATION INCLAUNCH LKN DAVIDSON TECH HUB — $25,000 · OtherLAUNCH LKN DAVIDSON TECH HUBCHURCH OF THE GOOD SHEPHERD INC — $11,000 · OtherCHARITYBUZZ MUSICIAN'S FUND — $10,500 · OtherTHE BRAIN TUMOUR CHARITY — $10,000 · OtherHILTON HEAD CONCOURSE CHARITABLE FD — $10,000 · Other+37 more — $90,130 · Other+37 moreDavidson College — $40,000 · EducationDavidson Co…SPECIAL EDUCATION LEGAL FUND INC — $9,500 · EducationSPECIAL EDU…SOCIAL GOOD FUND INC — $3,500 · EducationSOCIAL GOOD…+2 more — $1,200 · EducationMUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION INC — $49,500 · HealthMUSCULAR DY…ABILIS INC — $3,684 · HealthABILIS INC+2 more — $1,000 · HealthLaunchLKN Inc — $35,000 · EmploymentPOWER CROSS — $20,000 · ReligionSAMARITAN'S PURSE — $15,000 · ReligionRPM FOUNDATION — $25,000 · Arts & CultureMooresville Area Christian Mission Inc — $18,120 · Human ServicesTHE KINDNESS CLOSET INC — $6,015 · Human Services
Other$299,770Education$54,200Health$54,184Employment$35,000Religion$35,000Arts & Culture$25,000Human Services$24,135

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION INC — $49,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetDavidson College — $40,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLaunchLKN Inc — $35,000 over 2y, 33% of budgetMooresville Area Christian Mission Inc — $18,120 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE — $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSPECIAL EDUCATION LEGAL FUND INC — $9,500 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetEcho Foundation — $6,150 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetTHE KINDNESS CLOSET INC — $6,015 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetFEED MY STARVING CHILDREN INC — $5,110 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetABILIS INC — $3,684 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOCIAL GOOD FUND INC — $3,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetStewart Simmons Volunteer Fire Dept — $3,050 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetHOPE HOUSE FOUNDATION — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSANDHILLS COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEW YORK ROAD RUNNERS INC — $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetA BETTER CHANCE INC — $1,080 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPUT ON THE BRAKES INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetANGELS & SPARROWS SOUP KITCHEN INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHealthReach Community Clinic — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHRISTOPHER REEVE FOUNDATION — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE PISTON FOUNDATION INC — $200 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICA — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MUSCULAR DYSTROPHY ASSOCIATION INC
  • Who funds Davidson College
  • Who funds LaunchLKN Inc
  • Who funds RPM FOUNDATION
  • Who funds POWER CROSS
  • Who funds Mooresville Area Christian Mission Inc
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE
  • Who funds SPECIAL EDUCATION LEGAL FUND INC
  • Who funds Echo Foundation
  • Who funds THE KINDNESS CLOSET INC
  • Who funds FEED MY STARVING CHILDREN INC
  • Who funds ABILIS INC
  • Who funds SOCIAL GOOD FUND INC
  • Who funds Stewart Simmons Volunteer Fire Dept
  • Who funds HOPE HOUSE FOUNDATION
  • Who funds SANDHILLS COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Foundation for the CarolinasNC16.2× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Foundation for the Carolinas · United Way of Iredell County Inc · The Dale Jr Foundation · Truist Foundation Inc · Duke Energy Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Robert & Sherry Guth Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%3%10%23%40%your share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 74%
  • Abilis Inc74% of income from government
  • Christopher Reeve Foundation49% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 60 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph