· Private foundation
The Robert and Dorothy Goldberg Charitable Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k32 grants · $140k
- $10k–50k10 grants · $112k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| VAUGHAN COMMUNITY SERVICE INC | $15,000 |
| BARTLETT HISTORICAL SOCIETY | $14,000 |
| NORTH CONWAY COMMUNITY CENTER | $12,500 |
| EASTERN SLOPE AVIATION ACADEMY | $10,000 |
| GREATER LOVELL LAND TRUST | $10,000 |
| CARROLL CO YMCA CAMP HUCKINS | $10,000 |
| GIBSON CENTER FOR SENIOR SERVICES | $10,000 |
| MT WASHINGTON VALLEY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY | $10,000 |
| MSAD #72 | $10,000 |
| WHITE MOUNTAIN COMMUNITY HEALTH CTR | $10,000 |
| CENTER FOR GRIEVING CHILDREN | $8,000 |
| FRIENDS OF CASCO BAY | $8,000 |
| MT WASHINGTON VALLEY SCHOOL TO CAREER PARTR | $6,000 |
| CARROLL CO RETIREDSENIOR VOLUNTEER PROGRAM | $6,000 |
| KID'S FIRST CENTER | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $142k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +44% since the first grant, against +25% for the ones you funded once.
54 repeat relationships — 38 still active in FY2025, 16 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $17k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- VCVAUGHAN COMMUNITY SERVICE INC6× · 2020–2025 · $83k · revenue +17%
- WMWhite Mountain Community Health Center6× · 2020–2025 · $60k · revenue +46%
- CCCARROLL COUNTY YMCACAMP HUCKINS6× · 2020–2025 · $46k · revenue +180%
Funded once
- USUPPER SACO VALLEY LAND TRUSTone grant, 2021 · $26k · revenue -3%
- NCNORTH CONWAY PUBLIC LIBRARYone grant, 2020 · $10k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2022 · $10k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Maine Media Workshops & College educates and inspires visual artists and storytellers to achieve their creative potential. We provide lifelong learning opportunities for those pursuing the fine arts and media-related professions. We are…
The mission of the Bowdoin International Music Festival is to provide gifted young musicians from around the world with an opportunity to study with world-class artists, and to provide audiences with classical music performed to the…
To connect people to the past, present, and future of Maine's waterways and their global reach.
The mission of the Maine Museum of Photographic Arts is to inspire, engage and educate through the exhibition, preservation and collection of photographic works. The Museums programs address contemporary, historical, cultural and…
To enrich, educate, and entertain the community through film and art.
Founded in 1979, the Childrens House Montessori School cultivates curiosity, creativity, and critical thinking in young learners, while nurturing a sense of care for each other, the environment, and the world.
The mission of the mount desert land & garden preserve is to conserve and share the beauty of our historic lands and gardens.
The mission of Midcoast Conservancy is to protect vital lands and waters on a scale that matters and to inspire wonder and action on behalf of all species and the Earth.
The Maine Narrow Gauge Railroad Company & Museum preserves and operates hstoric two-foot gauge railroad equipment for the education and enjoyment of the public.
To illuminate and advance greater understanding of and support for Wabanaki Nations' heritage, living cultures, and homelands.
We conserve land permanently to benefit the natural and human communities of western the Penobscot Bay region.
Our mission is to inspire children, connect families, and build community through exploration, learning, and play.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Children's Museum and Theatre of Maine and the most unlike its peers is Hewnoaks Artist Colony. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 35 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
59 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 59 of the 81 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds VAUGHAN COMMUNITY SERVICE INC ↗
- Who funds White Mountain Community Health Center ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S MUSEUM AND THEATRE OF MAINE ↗
- Who funds CARROLL COUNTY YMCACAMP HUCKINS ↗
- Who funds BARTLETT HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds Portland Community Squash ↗
- Who funds OPERA MAINE ↗
- Who funds GREATER LOVELL LAND TRUST INC ↗
- Who funds MOUNTAIN TOP MUSIC CENTER ↗
- Who funds MT WASHINGTON VALLEY ARTS ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds The Susan L Curtis Foundation ↗
- Who funds TIN MOUNTAIN CONSERVATION CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds KIDS FIRST CENTER ↗
- Who funds GIBSON CENTER FOR SENIOR SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds MT WASHINGTON VALLEY SCHOOL TO CAREER PARTNERSHIP ↗
- Who funds NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF CASCO BAY ↗
- Who funds KISMET ROCK FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds AEOLIAN CHAMBER PLAYERS INC ↗
- Who funds GULF OF MAINE RESEARCH INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds UPPER SACO VALLEY LAND TRUST ↗
- Who funds MT WASHINGTON VALLEY ARTS JUBILEE ↗
- Who funds CAMP SUNSHINE AT SEBAGO LAKE INC ↗
- Who funds THE CENTER FOR GRIEVING CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds SAIL MAINE ↗
- Who funds MOUNT WASHINGTON VALLEY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY ↗
- Who funds University of Southern Maine Foundation ↗
- Who funds DENMARK ARTS CENTER ↗
- Who funds PORTLAND STAGE COMPANY ↗
- Who funds PORTLAND CHAMBER MUSIC FESTIVAL ↗
- Who funds The Yellow Tulip Project ↗
- Who funds LOVELL HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds NORTH FRYEBURG COMMUNITY CHAPEL ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Maine Community Foundation Inc · Sam L Cohen Foundation · New Hampshire Charitable Foundation · Davis Family Foundation · Morton-Kelly Charitable Trust · Onion Foundation · Stephen & Tabitha King Foundation Inc · Simmons Foundation - PerkinsThompson · Davis Conservation Foundation · Gibson Woodbury Charitable Foundation · Lunder Foundation · Libra Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Robert and Dorothy Goldberg Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Northeastern University — 7% of income from government
- Chatham Historical Society Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Robert and Dorothy Goldberg Charitable Foundation?
Find your warmest path to The Robert and Dorothy Goldberg Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.