· Private foundation
The Riehm Family Foundation Inc
Its FY2022 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2022.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2022
- Under $10k8 grants · $48k
- $10k–50k6 grants · $60k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| COASTAL CONSERVATION LEAGUE | $10,000 |
| SECOND HELPINGS | $10,000 |
| ANTI DEFAMATION LEAGUE DC | $10,000 |
| ELLER COLLEGE OF MANAGEMENT | $10,000 |
| FREEDOM ALLIANCE | $10,000 |
| HILTON HEAD ISLAND DEEP WELL PROJEC | $10,000 |
| MY SISTER'S PLACE | $7,000 |
| VETERANS ON DECK | $7,000 |
| FAMILY PROMISE OF BEAUFORT COUNTY | $7,000 |
| PRESERVATION SOCIETY OF CHARLESTON | $7,000 |
| HEROES ON HORSEBACK | $6,000 |
| SAINT STEPHEN UNITED METHODIST CHUR | $6,000 |
| WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN | $5,000 |
| AMERICAN COLLEGE OF THE BLDG ARTS | $3,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–22, $43k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +64% since the first grant, against +25% for the ones you funded once.
18 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2022, 6 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2022, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $13k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
FREEDOM ALLIANCE6× · 2017–2022 · $97k · revenue +112%- TPThe Preservation Society of Charleston Inc5× · 2018–2022 · $42k · revenue +133%
University of Arizona Foundation3× · 2018–2020 · $37k · revenue +19%
Funded once
- ADANTI DEFAMATION LEAGUE PACIFIC NWone grant, 2019 · $10k
- TJTHE JOY BUSgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue +420%
- MSMEETING STREET ACADEMYone grant, 2017 · $10k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
A champion for animals since 1967, PAWS is a nationally recognized leader - rehabilitating injured and orphaned wildlife, sheltering and adopting homeless cats and dogs, and educating people to make a better world for animals and people.
Our mission is to provide rescue and rehabilitation to animals in need, while also granting them a final and forever home to run free.
As a no-kill cat rescue, serving our community of Fountain Hills, AZ and surrounding areas, we are dedicated to rescuing cats and kittens left homeless for whatever reason and placing them in a loving, responsible, permanent home.
Freedom ride rescue is committed to saving dogs from overcrowded shelters and placing them in loving foster homes until they find their forever families. our mission is to create a no-kill state by rehabilitating and rehoming dogs while…
To end animal suffering through direct and compassionate action, and to inspire the highest ethical standards of humanity towards animals. The Organization rescues animals who fall victim to abuse and natural disaster.
Transforming the lives of shelter pets and veterans through compassionate assessment, compatible adoptions, and ongoing support.
To champion public awareness of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) and challenges confronting our countrys heroes and rally support for shelter animal adoption by connecting heroes and companions.
Project comeback provides lifelong care to the most unwanted, unadoptable, and overlooked horses. through veteran partnerships, we create a space where both horse and human can heal together first, fostering trust, respect, and…
The mission of take paws rescue is to meet the moral obligation to protect and save the lives of pets in need of rescue in louisiana. take paws rescue enacts this mission by pulling pets from rural and high kill shelters and preparing them…
Stray Hearts is a socially conscious shelter and adoption facility reuniting lost pets with their families and providing humane care and shelter for surrendered, lost, and homeless companion animals in Taos County, New Mexico.Our pledge:…
Humane Society of Charlotte mission is to champion the wellbeing of companion animals and strengthen their bond with the people who know, love, and need them.
Pets for Vets enriches the lives of veterans by creating a life-changing Super Bond with expertly selected and trained shelter or rescue pets. It provides ongoing expert support to ensure a reciprocal and thriving partnership at no cost to…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Montgomery County Humane Society Inc and the most unlike its peers is American College of the Building Arts. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 30 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds FREEDOM ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds The Preservation Society of Charleston Inc ↗
- Who funds University of Arizona Foundation ↗
- Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
- Who funds MONTGOMERY COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds Prancing Horse Inc ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN COLLEGE OF THE BUILDING ARTS ↗
- Who funds SECOND HELPINGS ↗
- Who funds FAMILY PROMISE OF THE LOWCOUNTRY ↗
- Who funds BRCA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE JOY BUS ↗
- Who funds MY SISTER'S PLACE INC ↗
- Who funds CONTINUING THE MISSION INC ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR WHALE RESEARCH ↗
- Who funds HEROES ON HORSEBACK ↗
- Who funds Therapeutic Riding of Tucson Inc ↗
- Who funds Make Way For Books ↗
- Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF SOUTHERN ARIZONA ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL DISASTER SEARCH DOG FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Keepers of the Wild ↗
- Who funds YOUTH ON THEIR OWN ↗
- Who funds Tucson Wildlife Center Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Coastal Community Foundation of South Carolina Inc · The Riehm Family Foundation Inc · Community Foundation for Southern Arizona · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Network for Good · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Riehm Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Riehm Family Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to The Riehm Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.