Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Richard H Yearick Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$79k
Granted FY2024still arriving
11
Grants FY2024still arriving
8
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2024.

Health$381kEducation$43kScience & Tech$24kSocial Science$13kInternational$10kAnimals$5k
02FY2024 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k10 grants · $69k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$7,500
Median grant
8
States reached
$1.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BURKE REHABILITATION HOSPITAL$10,000
ARTHRITIS FOUNDATION$8,500
NORD$8,500
CEREBRAL PALSY ALLIANCE RESEARCH$8,500
LIFE SCIENCES RESEARCH FOUNDATION$8,500
CENTER FOR HEALTHCARE INNOVATION$7,500
CONNECTING TO THE CURE$7,500
BONE HEALTH & OSTEOPOROSIS FDN$5,000
MILITARY HEALTH RESEARCH FOUNDATION$5,000
BREAKTHROUGH T1D$5,000
SKIN CANCER FOUNDATION$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY19–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 56% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%FOOD FOR THE HUNGRY: $5k → 11%MERR INSTITUTE: $5k → 10%CURE ALTHEIMERS FUND: $8k → 7%PARTNERS IN HEALTH: $5k → 16%CHILDRENS CANCER RESEARCH FUND: $8k → 11%DEMENTIA SOCIETY OF AMERICA: $8k → 6%GEISINGER HEALTH FOUNDATION: $10k → 10%THE HEART FOUNDATION: $8k → 10%GLAUCOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $5k → 10%SCRIPPS RESEARCH: $5k → 11%SPACE STUDIES INSTITUTE: $5k → 14%BURKE REHABILITATION HOSPITAL: $10k → 9%AMERICAN PARKINSON DISEASE ASSOC: $5k → 11%PROLITERACY: $13k → 14%SKIN CANCER FOUNDATION: $5k → 17%CLUBFOOT RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $5k → 8%THE URBAN INSTITUTE: $5k → 14%COPD FOUNDATION: $5k → 15%THE GOUT EDUCATION SOCIETY INC: $10k → 19%NORD: $9k → 9%LIFE SCIENCES RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $9k → 10%ARTHRITIS FOUNDATION: $9k → 13%AMERICAN HEARING RESEARCH FOUNDATIO: $8k → 7%CENTER FOR HEALTHCARE INNOVATION: $8k → 14%AUTISM SPEAKS: $8k → 11%CENTR FOR EXCELLENCE IN EDUCATION: $5k → 6%BONE HEALTH & OSTEOPOROSIS FDN: $5k → 7%MILITARY HEALTH RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $10k → 6%FOUNDATION FOR THE NATIONAL: $15k → 8%CONNECTING TO THE CURE: $15k → 14%WINIFRED MASTERSON BURKE REHAB HOSP: $10k → 9%PROLITERACY: $8k → 14%OCEAN CONSERVATORY: $8k → 14%CENTER FOR HEALTHCARE INNOVATION: $8k → 14%FDN FOR NATL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH: $10k → 8%CONNECTING FOR A CURE: $8k → 14%BURKE REHABILITATION HOSPITAL: $8k → 9%PROLITERACY: $8k → 14%CEREBRAL PALSY ALLIANCE RESEARCH: $9k → 17%FOUNDATION FOR NATIONAL INSTITUTES: $10k → 8%CONNECTING TO THE CURE: $8k → 14%CENTER FOR HEALTHCARE INNOVATION: $10k → 14%NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR INFECTIOUS D: $10k → 8%LUNG CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $8k → 17%ASSOC FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF BLOOD: $8k → 8%BLADER CANCER ADVOCACY NETWORK: $8k → 8%LYMPHOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $8k → 17%WOMANS CANCER RESEARCH FUND: $8k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MN
IL
NY
MA
IA
PA
NJ
CT
CA
VA
MD
DE
AZ
NC
DC
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

42%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$198k · 10 repeat orgs$277k to everyone else

10 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
34

Total granted

$198k
$233k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+26%
+46%

Still filing today

80%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 44% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $44k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthScience & TechPhilanthropySocial ScienceEducationInternationalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TW
    The Winifred Masterson Burke Rehabilitation Hospital
    3× · 2019–2024 · $28k · revenue +44%
  • LC
    LUNG CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION
    2× · 2020–2021 · $13k · revenue +39%
  • TH
    THE HEART FOUNDATION
    2× · 2020–2021 · $13k · revenue +26%

Funded once

  • FF
    FOUNDATION FOR THE NATIONAL
    one grant, 2022 · $15k
  • GH
    GEISINGER HEALTHgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue +133%
  • GE
    GOUT EDUCATION SOCIETY INC
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue -28%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Target Als Foundation Inc

Our mission is to break down barriers to als research to find effective treatments. by uniting academia, the pharma and biotech industry, government, venture capital, related nonprofits, and the als community, we aim to overcome the…

Education
2
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
3
The Translational Genomics Research Institute

Please see schedule o

Health
4
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
5
Targeting Resistance in Cancer Cooperative
Health
6
Blood Cancer United Inc

Our mission is to cure leukemia, lymphoma, hodgkin's disease and myeloma, and improve the quality of life of patients and their families.

Health
7
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Fdn Group

Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.

—
8
Brightfocus Foundation

Brightfocus foundation funds exceptional research worldwide to defeat alzheimer's disease, macular degeneration, and glaucoma and provides expert information on these heartbreaking diseases. please refer to schedule o for a complete…

Health
9
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center

Fred hutch cancer center ("fred hutch") unites innovative research and compassionate care to prevent and eliminate cancer and infectious disease. continued on schedule o

Health
10
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc

The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…

Health
11
Breakthrough Prize in Life Sciences Foundation
Philanthropy
12
Foundation for the National Institutes of Health Inc

To create and lead alliances and public-private partnerships that advance breakthrough biomedical discoveries and improve the quality of people's lives

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Arthritis Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Clubfoot Research. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyDevelopmental Disabilities …Cancer Support OrganizationsGovernment Accountability R…Christian Missionary Organi…Education Equity LeadershipCommunity Health Centers
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%4%<5yr14%4%5–10yr19%15%10–20yr16%30%20–35yr13%30%35–55yr16%19%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%5%<5yr14%2%5–10yr19%29%10–20yr16%21%20–35yr13%22%35–55yr16%21%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 5% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/30
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,535

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

29 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 29 of the 50 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
29/29
Grantees still filing
17/29
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CENTER FOR HEALTHCARE INNOVATION — $35,000 · HealthCENTER FOR HEALTHCARE INNOVATIONThe Winifred Masterson Burke Rehabilitation Hospital — $27,500 · HealthThe Winifred Masterson Burke Rehabilitation Hospit…AUTISM SPEAKS INC — $17,500 · HealthAUTISM SPEAKS INCLUNG CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION — $12,500 · HealthLUNG CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATIONAmerican Hearing Research Foundation — $12,500 · HealthAmerican Hearing Research FoundationGEISINGER HEALTH — $10,000 · HealthGOUT EDUCATION SOCIETY INC — $10,000 · HealthBONE HEALTH AND OSTEOPOROSIS FOUNDATION — $10,000 · HealthARTHRITIS FOUNDATION INC — $8,500 · HealthDEMENTIA SOCIETY INC — $8,000 · HealthLYMPHOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION — $8,000 · HealthTHE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH — $8,000 · HealthBLADDER CANCER ADVOCACY NETWORK INC — $7,500 · Health+7 more — $35,000 · Health+7 morePROLITERACY — $32,500 · OtherPROLITERACYCONNECTING TO THE CURE — $22,500 · OtherCONNECTING TO THE CUREFOUNDATION FOR THE NATIONAL — $15,000 · OtherFOUNDATION FOR THE NATIONALNATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR INFECTIOUS D — $10,000 · OtherFOUNDATION FOR NATIONAL INSTITUTES — $10,000 · OtherFDN FOR NATL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH — $10,000 · OtherNORD — $8,500 · OtherCEREBRAL PALSY ALLIANCE RESEARCH — $8,500 · OtherLIFE SCIENCES RESEARCH FOUNDATION — $8,500 · OtherASSOC FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF BLOOD — $8,000 · OtherCURE ALTHEIMERS FUND — $7,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $7,500 · OtherCONNECTING FOR A CURE — $7,500 · OtherWOMANS CANCER RESEARCH FUND — $7,500 · Other+9 more — $45,000 · Other+9 moreTHE HEART FOUNDATION — $12,500 · PhilanthropyCHILDREN'S CANCER RESEARCH FUND — $8,000 · PhilanthropyMILITARY HEALTH RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC — $15,000 · Science & TechCenter for Excellence in Education — $5,000 · Science & TechFOOD FOR THE HUNGRY INC — $5,000 · InternationalTHE URBAN INSTITUTE — $5,000 · Social ScienceTNTP INC — $5,000 · Education
Health$210,000Other$208,500Philanthropy$20,500Science & Tech$20,000International$5,000Social Science$5,000Education$5,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCENTER FOR HEALTHCARE INNOVATION — $35,000 over 5y, 4.4% of budgetThe Winifred Masterson Burke Rehabilitation Hospital — $27,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAUTISM SPEAKS INC — $17,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMILITARY HEALTH RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC — $15,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetLUNG CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION — $12,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican Hearing Research Foundation — $12,500 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetTHE HEART FOUNDATION — $12,500 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetGEISINGER HEALTH — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGOUT EDUCATION SOCIETY INC — $10,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetBONE HEALTH AND OSTEOPOROSIS FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetARTHRITIS FOUNDATION INC — $8,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLIFE SCIENCES RESEARCH FOUNDATION — $8,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetDEMENTIA SOCIETY INC — $8,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetLYMPHOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION — $8,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHILDREN'S CANCER RESEARCH FUND — $8,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH — $8,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLADDER CANCER ADVOCACY NETWORK INC — $7,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE SKIN CANCER FOUNDATION INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCONQUER CANCER FOUNDATION OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD FOR THE HUNGRY INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSPACE STUDIES INSTITUTE — $5,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGLAUCOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOPD FOUNDATION INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE URBAN INSTITUTE — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN PARKINSON DISEASE ASSOC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCenter for Excellence in Education — $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTNTP INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jpmorgan Chase Founda…Morgan Stanley Global…The Bank of America C…Paypal Charitable Giv…Donor Advised Charita…American Online Givin…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Jpmorgan Chase FoundationNY9.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Richard H Yearick Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 8%
  • Military Health Research Foundation Inc — 8% of income from government
  • Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 50 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home