Skip to content
The Reminger Foundation Company at a glance

· Community foundation

The Reminger Foundation Company

To further charitable and educational purposes by providing grants to community, charitable, and educational initiatives that needed additional support.

$98k
Granted FY2025still arriving
1
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
04Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$272kInternational$120kPublic Safety & Disaster$75kPhilanthropy$40kEducation$34kPublic Benefit$25kHuman Services$15kCrime & Legal$8k
02FY2025 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 1 grants below total $15,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $98,250 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $83,250 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$15,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE METROHEALTH FOUNDATION$15,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–23, $8k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%A KID AGAIN INC: $8k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 17% of The Reminger Foundation Company’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 69% of the giving stays in OH; by stated purpose, 51%.

The Reminger Foundation Companylessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 19% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Indiana University Health Frankfort Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
2
University Family Physicians Inc

Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…

—
3
Indiana University Health Foundation Inc

Indiana university health foundation leverages the power of philanthropy to support the iu health goal of making indiana one of the healthiest states in the nation.

Health
4
Lafayette General Foundation Inc

The lafayette general foundation was created to support lafayette general health (lgh), acadiana's only community-owned, nonprofit health system. we exist to help fulfill lgh's mission, to restore, maintain, and improve health. our role is…

Health
5
Mercy Health

Mercy Health will provide assistance, support and direction to all of the health care institutions and activities operated and maintained by its Subsidiaries. The mission of Mercy Health in performing these activities shall be to provide a…

—
6
Indiana University Health Care Associates Inc

To deliver preeminent medical care and service to our patients and communities through outstanding and innovative medical leadership and practice, while participating in and supporting excellence in education and research. We achieve this…

Health
7
Indiana University Health Bedford Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
8
Highmark Health

As the parent entity of a blended health organization, highmark health seeks to improve the health and well-being of the people and communities it serves by providing affordable, accessible and high-quality healthcare.

Health
9
Indiana University Health North Hospital Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
10
Indiana University Health West Hospital Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
11
Indiana University Health Ball Memorial Physicians Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
12
Uc Health Foundation

Uc health foundation is the fundraising entity of the uc healthcare system. our mission is to support groundbreaking work that takes place across the academic health center to provide the best in prevention, treatment, education and…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Franciscan Health Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Blood Cancer United Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/22
Grantees still filing
14/22
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MEDWISH MEDWORKS: $100,000 · HealthMEDWISH MEDWORKSUNIVERSITY HOSPITALS HEALTH SYSTEM INC: $51,000 · HealthUNIVERSITY HOSPITALS HEALTH SYSTEM INCTHE CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION: $50,000 · HealthTHE CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATIONTHE METROHEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 · HealthTHE METROHEALTH FOUNDATION INCBon Secours Mercy Health Inc: $25,000 · HealthBon Secours Mercy Health IncST VINCENT HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC: $15,000 · HealthBaptist Health Foundation Greater Louisville Inc: $12,500 · Health+3 more: $22,750 · Health+3 moreOHIOHEALTH CORPORATION: $50,000 · OtherOHIOHEALTH CORPORATIONCATHOLIC COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $20,000 · OtherCATHOLIC COMMUNITY FOUND…INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR CONFLICT PREVENTION & RESOLUTION INC: $20,000 · OtherINTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE …FLOYD MEMORIAL FOUNDATION INC: $12,500 · OtherFLOYD MEMORIAL FOUNDATIO…MAGNIFICAT HIGH SCHOOL: $10,000 · OtherMAGNIFICAT HIGH SCHOOLYOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF CLEVELAND OHIO: $7,000 · OtherYOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN A…JULIE BILLIART SCHOOL: $6,000 · OtherFOUNDATION FOR APPALACHIAN KENTUCKY INC: $75,000 · PhilanthropyFOUNDATION FOR APPALA…THE UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI FOUNDATION: $25,000 · PhilanthropyTHE UNIVERSITY OF CIN…FRANCISCAN HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $8,000 · PhilanthropyFRANCISCAN HEALTH FOU…UNITED WAY OF GREATER CLEVELAND: $5,250 · PhilanthropyPROMEDICA FOUNDATION: $25,000 · Public BenefitA KID AGAIN INC: $7,500 · Human ServicesBall State University Foundation Inc: $7,500 · EducationTHE LEGAL AID SOCIETY: $7,500 · Crime & Legal
Health$301,250Other$125,500Philanthropy$113,250Public Benefit$25,000Human Services$7,500Education$7,500Crime & Legal$7,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMEDWISH MEDWORKS: $100,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR APPALACHIAN KENTUCKY INC: $75,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetUNIVERSITY HOSPITALS HEALTH SYSTEM INC: $51,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE METROHEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPROMEDICA FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBon Secours Mercy Health Inc: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCATHOLIC COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetINTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR CONFLICT PREVENTION & RESOLUTION INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetST VINCENT HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFLOYD MEMORIAL FOUNDATION INC: $12,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetBaptist Health Foundation Greater Louisville Inc: $12,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetFRANCISCAN HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $8,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetA KID AGAIN INC: $7,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBall State University Foundation Inc: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE LEGAL AID SOCIETY: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF CLEVELAND OHIO: $7,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $5,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF GREATER CLEVELAND: $5,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Veale FoundationCharities Aid Foundat…The Blackbaud Giving …American Endowment Fo…The Ayco Charitable F…Morgan Stanley Global…Raymond James Charita…National Philanthropi…American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…The Bank of America C…Vanguard Charitable E…
The Veale FoundationOH13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Veale Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · American Endowment Foundation · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Reminger Foundation Company funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Reminger Foundation Company. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Reminger Foundation Company?

    Find your warmest path to The Reminger Foundation Company through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Reminger Foundation Company’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home