Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Reinhold Foundation %B Terry Reinhold

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$306k
Granted FY2024still arriving
29
Grants FY2024still arriving
10
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
0188% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Philanthropy$1.0MEducation$733kHealth$278kInternational$263kAnimals$230kEnvironment$205kHuman Services$195kArts & Culture$140kOther$0
02FY2024 · 29 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k13 grants · $61k
  • $10k–50k16 grants · $245k
$10,000
Median grant
10
States reached
$2.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MAUI COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$25,000
PACIFIC WHALE FOUNDATION$20,000
THE TREAVOR PROJECT$20,000
SEMPER FI FUND$20,000
HOAG HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$20,000
Individual grant recipient$20,000
MAASAI ASSOCIATION$20,000
PORTLAND SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA$15,000
SONOMA FOUND FOR BEHAVIORAL HEALTH$15,000
KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$10,000
WESTERN UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENC$10,000
SAVE THE CHILDREN$10,000
NAPILI BAY AND BEACH FOUNDATION$10,000
CENTER FOR EARLY PREV OF DEAFNESS$10,000
CAL POLY STATE UNIVERSITY$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–24, $28k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%HARRISON CHILDREN'S CENTER: $5k → 9%HARRISON CHILDREN'S CENTER: $3k → 9%WESTCHESTER CHILDREN'S ASSOC: $3k → 9%SAFE PLACE FOR YOUTH: $5k → 14%SAFE PLACE FOR YOUTH: $5k → 14%SAFE PLACE FOR YOUTH: $3k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $3k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $3k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

AK
ME
WA
IL
NY
MA
OR
CT
CA
AZ
KS
DC
HI
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.3M · 49 repeat orgs$283k to everyone else

49 repeat relationships: 19 still active in FY2024, 30 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

49
19

Total granted

$3.3M
$193k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+23%
+48%

Still filing today

45%
53%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 71% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $90k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureInternationalHuman ServicesEnvironmentHealthEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PW
    PACIFIC WHALE FOUNDATION
    6× · 2019–2024 · $210k · revenue +56%
  • Save The Children Federation Inc
    6× · 2017–2024 · $195k · revenue +21%
  • SF
    SEMPER FI & AMERICA'S FUND
    8× · 2017–2024 · $185k · revenue +56%

Funded once

  • SF
    SCHOLARSHIPS FOR NEEDY STUDENTS IN
    one grant, 2017 · $37k
  • E
    ENGENDER
    one grant, 2017 · $26k
  • WT
    WHALE TRUST MAUI
    one grant, 2018 · $20k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
2
American Association for the Advancement of Science

Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…

Science & Tech
3
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
4
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
5
The Water Research Foundation

The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…

Environment
6
Pacific University

A diverse and sustainable learning community dedicated to discovery and excellence in teaching, scholarship and practice, pacific university inspires students to think, care, create and pursue justice in our world.

Education
7
Oceana Inc

To advocate for policy changes by governments and corporations in order to preserve ocean life and return the oceans to their former abundance.

Environment
8
Seattle Biomedical Research Institute

We conduct fundamental infectious disease research to generate critical new knowledge about pathogens and their interactions with see schedule o for continuationhumans to enable the discovery and development of novel interventions,…

—
9
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
10
United States Telecom Association

See schedule oustelecom exists to ensure members can compete, grow and thrive to build a world where families, enterprises and communities are connected through the power of broadband.our member companies have committed a considerable…

—
11
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
12
Kqed Inc

See schedule okqed serves the people of northern california with a community-supported alternative to commercial media, providing the knowledge needed to make informed decisions; convening community dialogue; bringing the arts to everyone;…

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Safe Place for Youth Inc; the most unlike its peers is Berkeley Repertory Theatre. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

37 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 37 of the 77 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
37/37
Grantees still filing
28/37
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MAUI COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $1,030,000 · OtherMAUI COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INCIndividual grant recipient: $100,000 · OtherCAL POLY STATE UNIVERSITY: $88,667 · Other+52 more: $1,037,976 · Other+52 moreSEMPER FI & AMERICA'S FUND: $185,000 · HealthSEMPER FI &…HOAG HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $180,000 · HealthHOAG HOSPIT…+1 more: $5,000 · HealthPACIFIC WHALE FOUNDATION: $210,000 · EnvironmentPACIFIC W…NAPILI BAY AND BEACH FOUNDATIONINC: $70,000 · EnvironmentNAPILI BA…+2 more: $12,500 · EnvironmentMAASAI ASSOCIATION: $160,000 · EducationCenter for Early Intervention on Deafness: $82,500 · EducationKANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $10,000 · EducationSave The Children Federation Inc: $195,000 · InternationalAFS-USA INC: $10,000 · InternationalUS FOUNDATION FOR LIBERTY INC: $10,000 · International+2 more: $10,000 · InternationalAQUARIUM OF THE PACIFIC CORPORATION: $115,000 · AnimalsNAPILI KAI FOUNDATION: $34,500 · Arts & CultureBERKELEY REPERTORY THEATRE: $32,500 · Arts & CultureTHE RYE ARTS CENTER INC: $20,000 · Arts & CulturePORTLAND MAINE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $15,000 · Arts & CultureOREGON SHAKESPEARE FESTIVAL ASSOCIATION INC: $5,000 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $2,500 · Arts & Culture
Other$2,256,643Health$370,000Environment$292,500Education$252,500International$225,000Animals$115,000Arts & Culture$109,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPACIFIC WHALE FOUNDATION: $210,000 over 6y, 1.8% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc: $195,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSEMPER FI & AMERICA'S FUND: $185,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetHOAG HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $180,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetMAASAI ASSOCIATION: $160,000 over 8y, 44% of budgetAQUARIUM OF THE PACIFIC CORPORATION: $115,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetCenter for Early Intervention on Deafness: $82,500 over 7y, 0.9% of budgetNAPILI BAY AND BEACH FOUNDATIONINC: $70,000 over 6y, 26% of budgetFUTURES WITHOUT VIOLENCE: $47,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetCOME TO BELIEVE FOUNDATION: $40,000 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetTHE STORM TRYSAIL FOUNDATION: $40,000 over 8y, 2.9% of budgetNAPILI KAI FOUNDATION: $34,500 over 7y, 3.0% of budgetBERKELEY REPERTORY THEATRE: $32,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetTHE RYE ARTS CENTER INC: $20,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetTREVOR PROJECT INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWESTERN UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES: $17,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPORTLAND MAINE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $15,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetMAUI UNITED WAY: $12,500 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetSAFE PLACE FOR YOUTH INC: $12,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetPROSPECT SIERRA SCHOOL: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAFS-USA INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUS FOUNDATION FOR LIBERTY INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetBOMA FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 2y, 20% of budgetHARRISON CHILDREN'S CENTER INC: $7,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetSAVE THE SOUND: $7,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOREGON SHAKESPEARE FESTIVAL ASSOCIATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDIRECT RELIEF: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBeans Cafe Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSAINT JOHN'S CANCER INSTITUTE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetExploring New Horizons: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE MARITIME AQUARIUM AT NORWALK INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWESTCHESTER CHILDREN'S ASSOCIATION INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PACIFIC WHALE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Save The Children Federation Inc ↗
  • Who funds SEMPER FI & AMERICA'S FUND ↗
  • Who funds HOAG HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MAASAI ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds AQUARIUM OF THE PACIFIC CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds Center for Early Intervention on Deafness ↗
  • Who funds NAPILI BAY AND BEACH FOUNDATIONINC ↗
  • Who funds FUTURES WITHOUT VIOLENCE ↗
  • Who funds COME TO BELIEVE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE STORM TRYSAIL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NAPILI KAI FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BERKELEY REPERTORY THEATRE ↗
  • Who funds GLIDE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE RYE ARTS CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds TREVOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds WESTERN UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropic TrustPA11.2× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Network for Good · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Reinhold Foundation %B Terry Reinhold funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Reinhold Foundation %B Terry Reinhold. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 30%
  • Save the Sound: 37% of income from government
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
  • The Maritime Aquarium at Norwalk Inc: 5% of income from government
  • Oregon Shakespeare Festival Association Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 77 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Reinhold Foundation %B Terry Reinhold’s filings →

More from the funding graph