· Private foundation
The Red Cabin Foundation Trust
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k7 grants · $30k
- $10k–50k12 grants · $210k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $170k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| HAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION | $120,000 |
| KAPIOLANI HEALTH FOUNDATION | $50,000 |
| MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF HAWAII INC | $36,100 |
| THE V FOUNDATION | $30,000 |
| SEABURY HALL | $25,000 |
| CURE ALZHEIMER'S FUND | $20,000 |
| MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF HAWAII INC | $15,000 |
| MAUI FAMILY YMCA | $15,000 |
| MAUI HEALTH FOUNDATION | $15,000 |
| UVSC | $14,002 |
| MONTESSORI OF MAUI INC | $10,000 |
| CHARITY WATER | $10,000 |
| LAHAINA COMMUNITY LAND TRUST | $10,000 |
| RESOLVE INCORPORATED | $10,000 |
| GIFT FOUNDATION OF HAWAII | $6,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $172k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 94% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 7% of The Red Cabin Foundation Trust’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +98% since the first grant, against +16% for the ones you funded once.
31 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2024, 17 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $72k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- GIGRASSROOT INSTITUTE OF HAWAII INC3× · 2020–2022 · $200k · revenue +142%
- MOMONTESSORI OF MAUI INC5× · 2020–2024 · $196k · revenue +5%
- MFMAUI FAMILY YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION7× · 2017–2024 · $153k · revenue +98%
Funded once
- KLKa Lima O Maui Ltdone grant, 2019 · $100k · revenue -7%
- LCLanai Community Associationgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $50k · revenue +27% · 41% of their budget
- HCHALEAKALA CONSERVANCY INCone grant, 2022 · $25k · revenue 0%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To preserve the immediate and long-term health and wellbeing of lahaina's diverse communities and precious natural resources.
Protecting and promoting the marine biodiversity of Hawai'i through coral restoration, ecological monitoring, regenerative tourism, and cultural integration
To re-establish the systems that sustain our community through educational initiatives and land-based practices that cultivate abundance, regenerate responsibilities, and promote collective health and well being.
Our mission is to protect, perpetuate, and enhance the cultural and natural landscape of the kiholo bay area through collaborative management and active community stewardship.
To inspire lifelong environmental stewardship and to ensure the survival of coral reefs and sea turtles in hawaii through science-based conservation efforts, education and outreach.
Ho'ala kealakekua nui, inc. (hkn) is a native hawaiian-driven nonprofit corporation committed to implementing traditional methods of environmental stewardship and restoration, education and outreach, and cultural preservation at the wahi…
The mission of the corporation shall be to work with partners to protect and restore native ecosystems and watersheds, to improve the quality and quantity of freshwater resources to perpetuate hawaiian cultural resources and practices, to…
Papahana kuaola's mission is to create quality educational programs focused on environmental restoration and economic sustainability fully integrated with hawaiian knowledge in order to exemplify a lifestyle respectful of kanaka, `aina,…
The mission is to protect and preserve the natural and cultural resources of the hana moku and the customary and traditional practices of native hawaiians of the region; to preserve and manage the area's natural, cultural, scenic, historic…
To improve the health and well-being of our community.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of Hawaii and the most unlike its peers is International Rescue Committee Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 25% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
78 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 78 of the 109 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds GRASSROOT INSTITUTE OF HAWAII INC ↗
- Who funds MONTESSORI OF MAUI INC ↗
- Who funds HAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MAUI FAMILY YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF HAWAII ↗
- Who funds MAUI HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Ka Lima O Maui Ltd ↗
- Who funds UVSC ↗
- Who funds Kapi'olani Health Foundation ↗
- Who funds Lanai Community Association ↗
- Who funds HAWAIIAN ISLANDS LAND TRUST ↗
- Who funds SEABURY HALL ↗
- Who funds THE V FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds RESOLVE Incorporated ↗
- Who funds MAUI HUI MALAMA ↗
- Who funds BOOK TRUST ↗
- Who funds THE MAUI FARM INC ↗
- Who funds THE GIFT FOUNDATION OF HAWAII ↗
- Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE RESEARCH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HALEAKALA CONSERVANCY INC ↗
- Who funds LAKE CHELAN HEALTH AND WELLNESS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MAUI ARTS & CULTURAL CENTER ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF MAUI INC ↗
- Who funds ALOHA UNITED WAY INC ↗
- Who funds CHARITY GLOBAL INC ↗
- Who funds Hawaii Farmers Union Foundation ↗
- Who funds ASSISTANCE DOGS OF HAWAII ↗
- Who funds MAUI FOOD BANK INC ↗
- Who funds KA HALE A KE OLA HOMELESS RESOURCE CENTERS INC ↗
- Who funds HALE MAKUA HEALTH SERVICES ↗
- Who funds NISEI VETERANS MEMORIAL CENTER ↗
- Who funds ALOHA HARVEST ↗
- Who funds MAUI NUI RESILIENCY HUI ↗
- Who funds BASKETBALL MAUI ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF MOLOKAI HIGH & MIDDLE SCHOOLS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds LAHAINA COMMUNITY LAND TRUST ↗
- Who funds MAUI HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS HAWAII INC ↗
- Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF HAWAII ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Atherton Family Foundation · Fred Baldwin Memorial Foundation · Cooke Foundation Limited · Central Pacific Bank Foundation · Bank of Hawaii Charitable Fdn · Maui United Way · The Harry and Jeanette Weinberg Foundation Inc · The Strong Foundation · Kosasa Foundation · J Watumull Fund · Bendon Family Foundation · First Hawaiian Bank Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Red Cabin Foundation Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- University of Miami — 5% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Red Cabin Foundation Trust?
Find your warmest path to The Red Cabin Foundation Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.