Skip to content
The Re Corr Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

The Re Corr Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$269k
Granted FY2025still arriving
16
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Youth Development$189kFood & Nutrition$62kArts & Culture$57kHealth$45kCrime & Legal$40kHuman Services$34kPhilanthropy$30kHousing & Shelter$17kOther$0
02FY2025 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $24k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $145k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
$15,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$632k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
KIDZNOTES$100,000
UNITED WAY OF THE GREATER TRIANGLE INC$25,000
BAND TOGETHER$15,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF DURHAM AND ORANGE COUNTIES$15,000
THE FOUNDATION OF HOPE FOR RESEARCH & TREATMENT OF$15,000
LEGAL AID OF NORTH CAROLINA INC$15,000
EL FUTURO$15,000
STANDUP-SPEAKOUT-NC$15,000
NAMI WAKE COUNTY$15,000
SHINING LIGHT IN DARKNESS$15,000
COMITE DE APOYO A LOS TRABAJADORES AGRICOLAS INC$5,000
ACTIVATE GOOD INC$5,000
NEW JERSEY INSTITUTE FOR SOCIAL JUSTICE INC$5,000
GABIS GROUNDS COFFEE SHOP$5,000
FOOD BANK OF CENTRAL & EASTERN NORTH CAROLINA INC$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–25, $21k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 24% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%NEW JERSEY INSTITUTE FOR SOCIAL JUSTICE INC: $5k → 16%NOTE IN THE POCKET INC: $4k → 8%A DOORWAY TO HOPE: $5k → 8%DRESS FOR SUCCESS TRIANGLE NC: $7k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

56%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$300k · 6 repeat orgs$233k to everyone else

6 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
18

Total granted

$300k
$103k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+6%
+7%

Still filing today

100%
83%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 52% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $130k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesFood & NutritionEducationArts & CultureHousing & ShelterCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • KIDZNOTES INC
    4× · 2021–2025 · $164k · revenue +2%
  • FOOD BANK OF CENTRAL & EASTERN NC INC
    3× · 2020–2025 · $49k · revenue +46%
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF THE NC STATE MUSEUM OF NATURAL SCIENCES
    2× · 2019–2022 · $32k · revenue +13%

Funded once

  • A PLACE AT THE TABLEgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +38%
  • Designed For Joy
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +20%
  • NC
    NORTH CAROLINA VOTER PROJECTgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue +633%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
NourishNC Inc

NourishNC, Inc.'s goal is to provide healthy food to hungry children, empowering them to succeed in the classroom and in their community

Food & Nutrition
2
Equality Nc

Securing equality and justice for lgbtq north carolinians.

Civil Rights
3
Action Institute Nc

Action institute nc is a community organization and citizens action group that organizes residents of low-wealth communities and constituencies most of whom are people of color- to represent their own interests on issues of social and…

—
4
The North Carolina Coalition Against Domestic Violence

Nccadv leads the state's movement to end domestic violence and to enhance work with survivors through collaborations, innovative trainings, prevention, technical assistance, state policy development and legal advocacy.

—
5
North Carolina Aids Action Network

The NCAAN improves the lives of people living with HIV/AIDS and affected communities through outreach and public education, policy advocacy and community-building to increase visibility and mutual support of people living with HIV/AIDS…

Health
6
Disability Rights North Carolina

Disability rights north carolina is a legal advocacy organization that advances and defends the rights of people with all types of disabilities, of all ages, throughout north carolina.

—
7
Nc Budget & Tax Center

As a nonprofit, nonpartisan organization, we work to document and analyze fiscal and economic conditions in partnership with community leaders and north carolinians with lived experience of poverty to advance systemic solutions through…

Civil Rights
8
Alliance of Disability Advocates

To serve all north carolinians with significant disabilities by ensuring they can live independently in a barrier-free community of their choice through consumer-controlled, self-directed services.

Religion
9
CleanAIRE Nc

To advocate for the health of all North Carolinians by pursuing equitable and collaborative solutions that address climate change and air pollution.

Environment
10
North Carolina Victim Assistance Network

North carolina victim assistance network promotes the rights and needs of crime victims by educating north carolina's citizens and public policy leaders about the devastating impact that crime has on our society. serving our members as a…

—
11
Nami North Carolina Inc

The mission of nami north carolina is to promote recovery and optimize the quality of life for those living with mental illness.

—
12
Habitat for Humanity Cabarrus County

Guided by God, Habitat Cabarrus transforms lives and our community by uniting all of Cabarrus County around the cause of decent, affordable housing for everyone.

Housing & Shelter
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Way of the Greater Triangle Inc; the most unlike its peers is Shining Light in Darkness Foundatio. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

31 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 31 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
31/31
Grantees still filing
20/31
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

KIDZNOTES INC: $164,000 · Arts & CultureKIDZNOTES INCFRIENDS OF THE NC STATE MUSEUM OF NATURAL SCIENCES: $32,000 · Arts & CultureFRIENDS OF THE NC STATE MUSEUM OF NATURAL…BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF DURHAM AND ORANGE COUNTIES: $15,000 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF DURHAM AND…FOUNDATION OF HOPE FOR RESEARCH AND TREATMENT OF MENTAL ILLNESS: $15,000 · OtherFOUNDATION OF HOPE FOR RESEARCH …NAMI WAKE COUNTY: $15,000 · OtherNAMI WAKE COUNTYBAND TOGETHER: $20,000 · OtherBAND TOGETHEREL FUTURO INC: $15,000 · OtherEL FUTURO INCCASA: $7,000 · OtherDesigned For Joy: $10,000 · OtherDesigned For JoyNORTH CAROLINA VOTER PROJECT: $10,000 · OtherNORTH CAROLINA VOTER PROJECT+10 more: $45,500 · Other+10 moreFOOD BANK OF CENTRAL & EASTERN NC INC: $49,000 · Food & NutritionFOOD BANK OF …A PLACE AT THE TABLE: $10,000 · Food & NutritionA PLACE AT TH…SOUL FIRE FARM INSTITUTE INC: $2,500 · Food & NutritionLEGAL AID OF NORTH CAROLINA INC: $25,000 · Crime & LegalShining LIGHT IN Darkness Foundatio: $15,000 · Crime & LegalSTANDUP-SPEAKOUT OF NORTH CAROLINA: $15,000 · Human ServicesDRESS FOR SUCCESS TRIANGLE NC: $7,000 · Human ServicesA DOORWAY TO HOPE INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesTHE NEW JERSEY INSTITUTE FOR SOCIAL JUSTICE INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesNOTE IN THE POCKET INC: $3,750 · Human ServicesUNITED WAY OF THE GREATER TRIANGLE INC: $25,000 · PhilanthropyACTIVATE GOOD INC: $10,000 · EducationLEADERSHIP TRIANGLE INC: $7,500 · EducationWEE CARE CHILDREN'S ENRICHMENT PROGRAM INC: $5,000 · Education
Arts & Culture$196,000Other$152,500Food & Nutrition$61,500Crime & Legal$40,000Human Services$35,750Philanthropy$25,000Education$22,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetKIDZNOTES INC: $164,000 over 4y, 16% of budgetFOOD BANK OF CENTRAL & EASTERN NC INC: $49,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE NC STATE MUSEUM OF NATURAL SCIENCES: $32,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetUNITED WAY OF THE GREATER TRIANGLE INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetLEGAL AID OF NORTH CAROLINA INC: $25,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBAND TOGETHER: $20,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF DURHAM AND ORANGE COUNTIES: $15,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetShining LIGHT IN Darkness Foundatio: $15,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetEL FUTURO INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetACTIVATE GOOD INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetA PLACE AT THE TABLE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetDesigned For Joy: $10,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetNORTH CAROLINA VOTER PROJECT: $10,000 over 1y, 4.1% of budgetLEADERSHIP TRIANGLE INC: $7,500 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetDRESS FOR SUCCESS TRIANGLE NC: $7,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCASA: $7,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetOAK CITY CARES INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetA DOORWAY TO HOPE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF DURHAM INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF BUFFALO INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWEE CARE CHILDREN'S ENRICHMENT PROGRAM INC: $5,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetPINELANDS PRESERVATION ALLIANCE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNOTE IN THE POCKET INC: $3,750 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSOUL FIRE FARM INSTITUTE INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBlue Ridge Guide Association: $500 over 1y, 1.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Triangle Community Fo…Aj Fletcher FoundationUnited Way of the Gre…Duke University Healt…North Carolina Commun…Credit Suisse America…Duke UniversityTruist Foundation IncDuke Energy FoundationCarolinas Credit Unio…Foundation for the Ca…Band Together
Triangle Community Foundation IncNC42.1× affinity19 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Triangle Community Foundation Inc · Aj Fletcher Foundation · United Way of the Greater Triangle Inc · Duke University Health System Inc · North Carolina Community Foundation · Credit Suisse Americas Foundation · Duke University · Truist Foundation Inc · Duke Energy Foundation · Carolinas Credit Union Foundation · Foundation for the Carolinas · Band Together

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Re Corr Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Re Corr Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 35%
  • Pinelands Preservation Alliance: 35% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Re Corr Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home