Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Band Together

BAND TOGETHER uses live music as a platform for social change

$538k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$199k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Philanthropy$1.3MHuman Services$369kFood & Nutrition$306kHealth$180kCrime & Legal$60kYouth Development$60kArts & Culture$6k
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $39k
  • $50k–250k6 grants · $499k
$60,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$406k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNITED WAY OF THE GREATER TRIANGLE$198,589
EI FUTURO INC$60,000
HOPE FOR R&T MENTAL ILLNESS$60,000
NAMI WAKE COUNTY$60,000
BOYS GIRLS CLUBS OF DURHAM AND OR$60,000
SHINING LIGHT IN DARKNESS INC$60,000
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF WESTERN NC$39,292
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–20, $502k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%INTER-FAITH FOOD SHUTTLE: $294k → 8%INTER-FAITH FOOD SHUTTLE: $12k → 8%YMCA OF THE TRIANGLE: $196k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

76%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.6M · 3 repeat orgs$503k to everyone else

3 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
2

Total granted

$1.6M
$203k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-18%
+52%

Still filing today

100%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 40% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $300k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesPhilanthropyHealthCrime & LegalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UNITED WAY OF THE GREATER TRIANGLE INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $1.1M · revenue -18%
  • INTER-FAITH FOOD SHUTTLE
    2× · 2019–2020 · $306k · revenue +119%
  • TRIANGLE FAMILY SERVICES INC
    2× · 2018–2019 · $173k · revenue -23%

Funded once

  • TY
    The Young Men's Christian Association of the Triangle Area Inc (4598)graduated
    one grant, 2017 · $196k · revenue +52%
  • LT
    LINCOLN THEATRE
    one grant, 2021 · $6k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Restorative Transitions Inc

Re-entry Program in Durham NC

Crime & Legal
2
Mental Health Associates of the Triad

The Mental Health Associates of the Triad is committed to the promotion of good mental health through quality service provision, advocacy for issues affecting individuals and families with mental health issues, and outreach to the…

Health
3
Family Promise of Wake County Inc

Moving families at risk of or experiencing homelessness into sustainable, permanent housing in our community through a continuum of support services.

Housing & Shelter
4
NourishNC Inc

NourishNC, Inc.'s goal is to provide healthy food to hungry children, empowering them to succeed in the classroom and in their community

Food & Nutrition
5
Home First - Interfaith Housing and Family Services

Home-first offers permanent solutions to homelessness by providing transitional housing and permanent housing, homelessness prevention assitance and support services to strengthen families and build commun

6
Charlotte Family Housing

The mission of Charlotte Family Housing is to empower working families experiencing homelessness to achieve long-term self-sufficiency through shelter, housing, supportive services, and advocacy.

Human Services
7
Food Bank of Central & Eastern Nc Inc

Nourish people. build solutions. empower communities. no one goes hungry.

Food & Nutrition
8
Children's Home Society of North Carolina Inc

The Children's Home Society of North Carolina's mission is to promote the right of every child to a permanent, safe, and loving family.

Human Services
9
United Way of Cleveland County Inc

The United Way of Cleveland County helps people by uniting resources and programs to responsibly meet the needs of our community.

Philanthropy
10
Research Triangle Regional Partnership

The research triangle regional partnership is an association of area economic development agencies dedicated to keeping the research triangle region economically strong by collectively marketing the region's competitive advantages and…

11
First Choice Community Health Ctrs

Providing healthcare to the underserved population of Harnett County NC and the surrounding area.

Health
12
The Resiliency Collaborative Inc

Trc partners with bipoc youth and their ecosystems to strengthen their sense of identity, belonging, and purpose so they can create a healthier, more equitable wake county.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Triangle Family Services Inc and the most unlike its peers is Shining Light in Darkness Foundatio. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
6/10
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

UNITED WAY OF THE GREATER TRIANGLE INC — $1,136,795 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF THE GREATER TRIANGLE INCTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF WESTERN NORTH CAROLINA INC — $139,292 · PhilanthropyTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF WESTERN NORTH CAROLINA INCINTER-FAITH FOOD SHUTTLE — $305,595 · Human ServicesINTER-FAITH FOOD SHUTTLEThe Young Men's Christian Association of the Triangle Area Inc (4598) — $196,469 · Human ServicesThe Young Men's Christian…TRIANGLE FAMILY SERVICES INC — $172,695 · OtherTRIANGLE FAMILY SE…NAMI WAKE COUNTY — $60,000 · OtherNAMI WAKE COUNTYFOUNDATION OF HOPE FOR RESEARCH AND TREATMENT OF MENTAL ILLNESS — $60,000 · OtherFOUNDATION OF HOPE…BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF DURHAM AND ORANGE COUNTIES — $60,000 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS…+1 more — $6,330 · OtherEL FUTURO INC — $60,000 · HealthShining LIGHT IN Darkness Foundatio — $60,000 · Crime & Legal
Philanthropy$1,276,087Human Services$502,064Other$359,025Health$60,000Crime & Legal$60,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUNITED WAY OF THE GREATER TRIANGLE INC — $1,136,795 over 4y, 5.2% of budgetINTER-FAITH FOOD SHUTTLE — $305,595 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetThe Young Men's Christian Association of the Triangle Area Inc (4598) — $196,469 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTRIANGLE FAMILY SERVICES INC — $172,695 over 2y, 4.5% of budgetTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF WESTERN NORTH CAROLINA INC — $139,292 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetEL FUTURO INC — $60,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Re Corr Family FoundationDE17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Re Corr Family Foundation · Duke University Health System Inc · United Way of the Greater Triangle Inc · Triangle Community Foundation Inc · Duke Energy Foundation · Rex Hospital Inc · Aj Fletcher Foundation · North Carolina Community Foundation · Fidelity Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · Network for Good

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Band Together funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph