Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Rachel & Drew Katz Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$65k
Granted FY2025still arriving
23
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
0196% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.

Health$669kEducation$428kPhilanthropy$255kCivil Rights$161kRecreation & Sports$137kYouth Development$125kArts & Culture$84kHuman Services$74kOther$0
02FY2025 · 23 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k22 grants · $35k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $30k
$1,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$27k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WILSON'S DISEASE ASSOCIATION$30,000
DEVILS YOUTH FOUNDATION INC$6,000
FRIENDS OF THE IDF$3,600
DOWNTOWN GIANTS YOUTH SPORTS$2,500
SPECIAL OLYMPICS PENNSYLVANIA$2,500
TRIPLE NEGATIVE BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION$2,500
LATINAS IN MOTION$2,500
COPLINE$2,500
HORIZONS NEWARK$2,000
THE SALVATION ARMY$2,000
CENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
BRAVE HEARTS FOR STRONG MINDS$1,000
THE LEUKEMIA & LYMPHOMA SOCIETY$1,000
GYEL ENDEAVORS INC$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $140k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 71% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%THE DREAM BIG FOUNDATION: $5k → 7%COPLINE: $8k → 6%CHALLENGED ATHLETES FOUNDATION: $50k → 11%LIFE'S WORC: $3k → 6%THE DREAM BIG FOUNDATION: $3k → 7%RIVER FUND: $3k → 13%COPLINE: $5k → 6%CHALLENGED ATHLETES FOUNDATION: $10k → 11%LIFE'S WORC: $3k → 6%DREAM BIG FOUNDATION: $2k → 7%COPLINE: $3k → 6%CHALLENGED ATHLETES FOUNDATION: $5k → 11%LUSTGARTEN FOUNDATION: $5k → 6%COPLINE: $2k → 6%CHALLENGED ATHLETES FOUNDATION: $5k → 11%LUSTGARTEN FOUNDATION: $1k → 6%COPLINE: $1k → 6%COVENANT HOUSE NEW JERSEY: $2k → 16%CHALLENGED ATHLETES FOUNDATION: $1k → 11%COPLINE: $1k → 6%COVENANT HOUSE NEW JERSEY: $2k → 16%THE CHALLENGED ATHLETES FOUNDATION: $1k → 11%COPLINE: $1k → 6%COVENANT HOUSE NEW JERSEY: $500 → 16%CHALLENGED ATHLETES FOUNDATION: $1k → 11%GRAND STREET SETTLEMENT: $5k → 17%ENCOURAGE KIDS FOUNDATION: $5k → 17%ENCOURAGE KIDS FOUNDATION: $5k → 17%ENCOURAGE KIDS FOUNDATION: $5k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

VT
NH
IL
NY
MA
NV
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
CO
VA
MD
NM
AR
SC
DC
HI
OK
LA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

73%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.3M · 71 repeat orgs$489k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +20% since the first grant, against +18% for the ones you funded once.

71 repeat relationships — 13 still active in FY2025, 58 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

71
132

Total granted

$1.3M
$477k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+20%
+18%

Still filing today

76%
64%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $12k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationPhilanthropyArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WD
    Wilson Disease Association
    4× · 2017–2025 · $190k · revenue +146%
  • TD
    THE DISCOVERY LAND COMPANY FOUNDATION
    2× · 2018–2019 · $104k · revenue +44%
  • CH
    COVENANT HOUSE INC
    4× · 2017–2020 · $84k · revenue +31%

Funded once

  • AL
    ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUEgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $150k · revenue +78%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA HEALTH SYSTEM DIVISION OF PERCEPTUAL STUDIES
    one grant, 2017 · $38k
  • SJ
    SNOW JOE LLC
    one grant, 2020 · $10k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
2
The Lieber Institute Inc

The mission of the institute is to translate basic genetic and molecular mechanisms of schizophrenia and related developmental brain disorders into clinical advances that change the lives of affected individuals. it is catalyzing a new…

Health
3
Samuel Waxman Cancer Research Foundation

The samuel waxman cancer research foundation (the "foundation") funds innovative research to bring faster cures to patients. in addition to supporting ongoing collaborative research in specific cancers, our scientists are investigating the…

—
4
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
5
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
6
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
7
Metropolitan Jewish Health System Inc

Mjhs health system is a charitable not-for-profit established to support the activities of affiliated organizations. mjhs is built on the core values of compassion, dignity and respect, first established by the four brooklyn ladies in…

Health
8
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
9
The Multiple Myeloma Research Foundation Inc

The multiple myeloma research foundation (mmrf) is the largest nonprofit in the world solely focused on accelerating acurefor multiple myeloma patient. we drive the development and delivery of next-generation therapies, leverage data to…

Health
10
Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors Inc

Rockefeller philanthropy advisors aims to accelerate philanthropy in pursuit of a just world

Philanthropy
11
Albert Einstein College of Medicine

Committed to exceptional healthcare quality for all and actively engaged with our community, einstein drives scientific discovery and educates compassionate leaders in health and science.

Education
12
Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation

The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.

Science & Tech

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Oliver Scholars Program Inc and the most unlike its peers is Breathe 4 Als Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity FoundationsYouth Sports ProgramsVolunteer Fire & Ems Servic…Food Banks and PantriesLocal Food System Organizat…Health Access Advocacy and …Jewish Community Organizati…Faith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Independent K-12 SchoolsLocal History MuseumsCancer Support Services
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 30 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%2%<5yr14%5%5–10yr19%21%10–20yr16%30%20–35yr13%23%35–55yr16%19%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%3%5–10yr19%21%10–20yr16%34%20–35yr13%20%35–55yr16%22%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
2%3/159
the rest of the field
13%
240,393/1,819,406

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

151 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 151 of the 215 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
22
Early backer (in before they grew)
146/151
Grantees still filing
99/151
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Wilson Disease Association — $189,500 · OtherWilson Disease AssociationJEWISH COMMUNITY PROJECT — $105,998 · OtherJEWISH COMMUNITY PROJECTUNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA HEALTH SYSTEM DIVISION OF PERCEPTUAL STUDIES — $37,500 · OtherTHE DOOR - A CENTER OF ALTERNATIVES INC — $34,080 · Other+106 more — $375,000 · Other+106 moreTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY — $260,000 · EducationTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES …RIVERDALE COUNTRY SCHOOL INC — $75,000 · EducationRIVERDALE COUNTRY SCHO…LEARNINGSPRING SCHOOL — $22,500 · EducationLEARNINGSPRING SCHOOL+16 more — $47,500 · Education+16 moreTHE DISCOVERY LAND COMPANY FOUNDATION — $104,380 · PhilanthropyTHE DISCOVERY L…DAVID LYNCH FOUNDATION FOR CONSCIOUSNESS -BASED EDUCATION AND WORLD PEACE — $104,000 · PhilanthropyDAVID LYNCH FOU…RILEY'S WAY FOUNDATION INC — $20,000 · PhilanthropyRILEY'S WAY FOU…PROSTATE CANCER FOUNDATION — $12,000 · PhilanthropyREISENBACH PHILANTHROPIES INC — $10,000 · PhilanthropyM NIGHT SHYAMALAN FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 · PhilanthropyGoodnation Foundation Inc — $10,000 · Philanthropy+7 more — $15,800 · Philanthropy+7 moreCOVENANT HOUSE INC — $83,500 · HealthCOVENANT HOUSE…CHILDREN'S CANCER AND BLOOD FOUNDATION INC — $82,000 · HealthCHILDREN'S CAN…TRIPLE NEGATIVE BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION — $21,000 · HealthTRIPLE NEGATIV…American Heart Association Inc — $11,000 · HealthPLATELET DISORDER SUPPORT ASSOCIATION — $10,000 · HealthMULTIPLE SCLEROSIS ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA INC — $9,000 · Health+27 more — $50,750 · Health+27 moreANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE — $150,000 · Civil Rights+1 more — $1,000 · Civil RightsCHALLENGED ATHLETES INC — $73,000 · Human ServicesCOPLINE INC — $20,000 · Human ServicesENCOURAGE KIDS FOUNDATION — $15,000 · Human ServicesTHE DREAM BIG FOUNDATION — $9,000 · Human ServicesMARC LUSTGARTEN PANCREATIC CANCER FOUNDATION — $6,000 · Human ServicesLIFE'S WORC INC — $5,000 · Human Services+4 more — $12,080 · Human ServicesCrystal Bridges-Museum of American Art Inc — $27,000 · Arts & CultureDEVILS YOUTH FOUNDATION INC — $16,000 · Arts & CulturePHILADELPHIA THEATRE COMPANY — $7,500 · Arts & CultureNATIONAL CONSTITUTION CENTER — $5,000 · Arts & CultureNATIONAL ITALIAN AMERICAN FOUNDATIONINC — $5,000 · Arts & CultureThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum — $4,300 · Arts & CultureMANHATTAN THEATRE CLUB INC — $2,500 · Arts & Culture+5 more — $5,500 · Arts & Culture
Other$742,078Education$405,000Philanthropy$286,180Health$267,250Civil Rights$151,000Human Services$140,080Arts & Culture$72,800

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY — $260,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetWilson Disease Association — $189,500 over 4y, 18% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE — $150,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE DISCOVERY LAND COMPANY FOUNDATION — $104,380 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetDAVID LYNCH FOUNDATION FOR CONSCIOUSNESS -BASED EDUCATION AND WORLD PEACE — $104,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE INC — $83,500 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetCHILDREN'S CANCER AND BLOOD FOUNDATION INC — $82,000 over 5y, 3.8% of budgetRIVERDALE COUNTRY SCHOOL INC — $75,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCHALLENGED ATHLETES INC — $73,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetTHE DOOR - A CENTER OF ALTERNATIVES INC — $34,080 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetCrystal Bridges-Museum of American Art Inc — $27,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLEARNINGSPRING SCHOOL — $22,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS PENNSYLVANIA INC — $22,500 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetTRIPLE NEGATIVE BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION — $21,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetRILEY'S WAY FOUNDATION INC — $20,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetCOPLINE INC — $20,000 over 7y, 4.0% of budgetDEVILS YOUTH FOUNDATION INC — $16,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetENCOURAGE KIDS FOUNDATION — $15,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc — $11,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FARM TEAM INC — $10,000 over 2y, 4.3% of budgetREISENBACH PHILANTHROPIES INC — $10,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetISRAEL TENNIS CENTERS FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetM NIGHT SHYAMALAN FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetGoodnation Foundation Inc — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPLATELET DISORDER SUPPORT ASSOCIATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetNEW YORK ROAD RUNNERS INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE DREAM BIG FOUNDATION — $9,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetMULTIPLE SCLEROSIS ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA INC — $9,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPEACE FIRST INC — $8,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetPHILADELPHIA THEATRE COMPANY — $7,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC — $7,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBrave Hearts for Strong Minds — $7,000 over 7y, 2.7% of budgetHORIZONS NEWARK INC — $7,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetMAUI FOOD BANK INC — $6,740 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHARLEM GROWN INC — $6,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetMARC LUSTGARTEN PANCREATIC CANCER FOUNDATION — $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF SOUTHERN NEW JERSEY — $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRAVITZ FAMILY FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR OUTDOOR ADVERTISING RESEARCH AND EDUCATION — $5,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetMASTERY CHARTER SCHOOLS FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE OLIVER SCHOLARS PROGRAM INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE URBAN ASSEMBLY INC — $5,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF ESSEX HUDSON AND UNION COUNTIES NEW JERSEY INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF PHILADELPHIA INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGRASSROOT SOCCER INC — $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL CONSTITUTION CENTER — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLIFE'S WORC INC — $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL ITALIAN AMERICAN FOUNDATIONINC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Katz FoundationUnited Way of Greater…The Philadelphia Foun…The Goldman Sachs Cha…The Daniel B and Flor…The Saramar Charitabl…The Snider FoundationJewish Communal FundFjcGray FoundationCommunity Foundation …The Green Family Char…
Katz FoundationNJ32.4× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Katz Foundation · United Way of Greater Philadelphia and Southern New Jersey · The Philadelphia Foundation · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · The Daniel B and Florence E Green Foundation · The Saramar Charitable Fund · The Snider Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund · Fjc · Gray Foundation · Community Foundation of New Jersey · The Green Family Charitable Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Rachel & Drew Katz Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 270%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 34%
  • Covenant House New Jersey Inc — 34% of income from government
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
27get no government money at all
29report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 215 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home