Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Providence Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$181k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$617kInternational$458kEducation$213kHuman Services$190kFood & Nutrition$83kHousing & Shelter$40kReligion$35kPhilanthropy$30kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $33k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $99k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$10,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$3.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CROSSROADS CORP$50,000
ACCESSIBLE HOPE INTERNATIONAL$25,000
OPERATION AIRDROP$15,000
THE FOUNDATION FOR TOMORROW$15,000
SACRED VALLEY PROJECT$13,500
WATER MISSION$10,000
HOPE INC$10,000
PROJECT HOPE FOUNDATION$10,000
FIRST IN FAMILES OF MECKLENBURG$7,500
FOOD FOR THE POOR$7,500
SAMARITAN'S PURSE$7,500
FAVOR UPSTATE$5,000
NOURISH UP$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $484k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%PIEDMONT WOMEN'S CENTER: $1k → 10%THORNWELL: $1k → 18%THE 410 BRIDGE: $1k → 13%PIEDMONT WOMEN'S CENTER: $1k → 10%NOURISH UP: $5k → 10%PROJECT HOPE FOUNDATION: $203k → 10%PROJECT HOPE FOUNDATION: $196k → 10%PROJECT HOPE FOUNDATION: $35k → 10%PROJECT HOPE FOUNDATION: $10k → 10%PROJECT HOPE FOUNDATION: $10k → 10%PROJECT HOPE FOUNDATION: $10k → 10%PROJECT HOPE FOUNDATION: $10k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NJ
CT
CA
MO
NC
SC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.7M · 26 repeat orgs$137k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +59% since the first grant, against +32% for those funded once.

26 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 15 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

26
19

Total granted

$1.7M
$117k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+59%
+32%

Still filing today

54%
47%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalHuman ServicesEducationArts & CultureReligionPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PH
    PROJECT HOPE FOUNDATION INC
    7× · 2017–2025 · $475k · revenue +34%
  • WM
    WATER MISSIONS INTERNATIONAL
    8× · 2017–2025 · $155k · revenue +115%
  • FA
    FACES AND VOICES OF RECOVERY(FAVOR) UPSTATE SC
    6× · 2017–2025 · $130k · revenue +98%

Funded once

  • BS
    BON SECOURS ST FRANCIS FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $25k
  • GT
    GREENVILLE TECHNICAL COLLEGE
    one grant, 2017 · $18k
  • DIRECT RELIEF
    one grant, 2024 · $15k · revenue +1%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Feed the Hunger Inc

Feeding the spiritual and physical hunger, especially in at-risk children.

—
2
Food for the Hungry Inc

Food for the hungry is a christian humanitarian aid and global development organization that has designed, developed and delivered solutions for more than 50 years so that children, families and communities can flourish. (continued on…

International
3
Hope Ministries of Baton Rouge

Prevent homelessness. promote self-sufficiency and dignity.

Housing & Shelter
4
Chariots for Hope Inc

Chariots for hope shares the hope of christ by loving kenyan children through christian discipleship and long-term physical, emotional, and educational care and provision. the vision of chariots for hope is to create a transformed future…

International
5
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community

Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…

—
6
Habitat for Humanity of Greater Palm Beach County

Seeking to put god's love into action, habitat for humanity brings people together to build homes, communities and hope.

—
7
Trinity Hope Inc

Teach christian beliefs and feed children in haiti.

International
8
Christian Healthcare Ministries Inc

To glorify god, show christian love, and experience god's presence as christians share each other's medical bills.

Religion
9
Baptist Children's Homes of North Carolina Incorporated

Baptist children's homes of north carolina (bch) is a nonprofit organization that reaches out to children and families in crisis. the agency's mission statement is "sharing hope...changing lives."

Religion
10
Love the Hungry Inc

The corporation is organized to provide nutritious fortified meals throughout the world to children and families that are most vunerable to hunger and malnutriion.

Food & Nutrition
11
Hope Worldwide Ltd

Motivated by god's love, we partner with our neighbors in need, equip volunteers, respond to disasters and strenghten communities to inspire greater hope in our world.

International
12
Hope of the Poor Inc

To inspire all generations to radically live out the gospel through finding christ in the distressing disguise of the poor.

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Convoy of Hope; the most unlike its peers is Samaritan's Purse. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

29 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 29 of the 49 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
26/29
Grantees still filing
21/29
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CROSSROADS CORP: $142,500 · OtherCROSSROADS CORPFACES AND VOICES OF RECOVERY(FAVOR) UPSTATE SC: $130,000 · OtherFACES AND VOICES OF RECOVERY(FAVOR) UPSTATE SCIndividual grant recipient: $107,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientBELMONT ABBEY COLLEGE-KENS BUTEAU: $58,207 · OtherBELMONT ABBEY COLLEGE-KENS BUTEAUST ANTHONY OF PADUA SCHOOL: $35,000 · OtherPROJECT HOST INC: $30,000 · OtherGARDNERWEBB UNIVERSITY-KENS BUTREAU: $29,610 · OtherFREE THE KIDS INC: $29,310 · OtherFIRST IN FAMILES OF MECKLENBURG: $28,000 · Other+19 more: $180,859 · Other+19 morePROJECT HOPE FOUNDATION INC: $474,928 · Human ServicesPROJECT HOPE FOUNDATION INCHope Inc: $22,500 · Human Services+4 more: $9,170 · Human ServicesWATER MISSIONS INTERNATIONAL: $155,000 · InternationalWATER MISSIONS INTER…Accessible Hope International: $103,000 · InternationalAccessible Hope Inte…Sacred Valley Project Inc: $24,020 · InternationalSacred Valley Projec…FOOD FOR THE POOR INC: $20,100 · InternationalFOOD FOR THE POOR IN…DIRECT RELIEF: $15,000 · International+3 more: $18,000 · International+3 moreThe Foundation for Tomorrow Inc: $67,500 · EducationCLEMSON UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $30,000 · EducationSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $75,500 · ReligionMIDDLE TYGER COMMUNITY CENTER: $10,000 · Recreation & SportsROOF ABOVE INC: $10,000 · Arts & CultureTHE CHRISTIAN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT FUND INC: $5,000 · PhilanthropyGASTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $2,000 · Philanthropy
Other$770,486Human Services$506,598International$335,120Education$97,500Religion$75,500Recreation & Sports$10,000Arts & Culture$10,000Philanthropy$7,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPROJECT HOPE FOUNDATION INC: $474,928 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetWATER MISSIONS INTERNATIONAL: $155,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetFACES AND VOICES OF RECOVERY(FAVOR) UPSTATE SC: $130,000 over 6y, 1.9% of budgetAccessible Hope International: $103,000 over 2y, 9.8% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $75,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetThe Foundation for Tomorrow Inc: $67,500 over 5y, 2.4% of budgetPROJECT HOST INC: $30,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetCLEMSON UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFREE THE KIDS INC: $29,310 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC: $25,000 over 3y, 6.3% of budgetSacred Valley Project Inc: $24,020 over 2y, 4.4% of budgetHope Inc: $22,500 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetFOOD FOR THE POOR INC: $20,100 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetDIRECT RELIEF: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMIDDLE TYGER COMMUNITY CENTER: $10,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetROOF ABOVE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S HUNGER FUND: $8,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHICKORY COVE BIBLE CAMP: $7,500 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CHRISTIAN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT FUND INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetNourish Up: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBIRTHRIGHT OF GREENVILLE INC: $4,500 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetGASTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPIEDMONT WOMEN'S CENTER: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMEYER CENTER FOR SPECIAL CHILDREN: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE 410 BRIDGE INC: $1,170 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHORNWELL: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PROJECT HOPE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds WATER MISSIONS INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds FACES AND VOICES OF RECOVERY(FAVOR) UPSTATE SC ↗
  • Who funds Accessible Hope International ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
  • Who funds The Foundation for Tomorrow Inc ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT HOST INC ↗
  • Who funds CLEMSON UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FREE THE KIDS INC ↗
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC ↗
  • Who funds Sacred Valley Project Inc ↗
  • Who funds Hope Inc ↗
  • Who funds FOOD FOR THE POOR INC ↗
  • Who funds OPERATION AIRDROP INC ↗
  • Who funds DIRECT RELIEF ↗
  • Who funds MIDDLE TYGER COMMUNITY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds ROOF ABOVE INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S HUNGER FUND ↗
  • Who funds HICKORY COVE BIBLE CAMP ↗
  • Who funds Save The Children Federation Inc ↗
  • Who funds CONVOY OF HOPE ↗
  • Who funds THE CHRISTIAN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds Nourish Up ↗
  • Who funds BIRTHRIGHT OF GREENVILLE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Duke Energy FoundationNC20.3× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Duke Energy Foundation · United Way of Greenville County Inc · Ge Aerospace Foundation · Foundation for the Carolinas · Scansource Charitable Foundation · Dabo's All in Team Foundation · South Carolina Christian Foundation · Yeargin Foundation · Neill M Timmons Foundation · AWT Family Foundation · Scsymmes Foundation · John I Smith Charities Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Providence Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Providence Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 30%
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
  • Food for the Poor Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 49 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Providence’s filings →

More from the funding graph