· Private foundation
Scansource Charitable Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k59 grants · $197k
- $10k–50k11 grants · $127k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| MILL VILLAGE MINISTRIES | $50,000 |
| SLEEP IN HEAVENLY PEACE | $20,250 |
| LIVEWELL GREENVILLE | $13,000 |
| CHRISTMAS SHOES | $12,500 |
| LEO SANTA | $10,500 |
| KIND OF THE UPSTATE | $10,439 |
| LEAD ACADEMY CHARTER SCHOOL | $10,000 |
| WE CARE FOR YOU INC | $10,000 |
| REDWOOD EMPIRE FOOD BANK | $10,000 |
| PUBLIC EDUCATION PARTNERS | $10,000 |
| SUNSHINE ON A RANNEY DAY | $10,000 |
| PROJECT HOST | $10,000 |
| PHILLIS WHEATLEY COMMUNITY CENTER | $9,750 |
| WASHINGTON CENTER PTA | $8,100 |
| THE FAMILY EFFECT | $7,800 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $601k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 98% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +13% since the first grant, against +8% for the ones you funded once.
84 repeat relationships — 30 still active in FY2025, 54 since wound down; 41 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 60% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $148k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- MVMILL VILLAGE MINISTRIES3× · 2021–2025 · $255k · revenue +112%
- MCMEYER CENTER FOR SPECIAL CHILDREN2× · 2020–2021 · $50k · revenue +67%
- UCUPSTATE CIRCLE OF FRIENDS5× · 2020–2025 · $45k · revenue +53%
Funded once
- OAOPERATION AIRDROP INCone grant, 2024 · $38k
- CICommunities in Schools of South Carolinagraduatedone grant, 2020 · $25k · revenue +368%
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2023 · $20k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Carolina Teen Center is a prevention and education year-round after-school and summer program that services youth and their families. Literacy programs, tutoring, life skills, mentoring, positive peer groups, conflict resolution skills,…
To strengthen families, organizations, and communities to prevent child abuse and neglect.
Per south carolina code section 59-152-30: "the goals for south carolina first steps to school readiness are to: (1) provide parents with access to the support they might seek and want to strengthen their families and to promote the…
Harvest hope is on a mission to eliminate hunger and food insecurity in south carolina. we rescue nutritious food from stores throughout the state and distribute it to food pantries, shelters, and soup kitchens. we operate programs that…
Founded in 1886, thompson child & family focus is called to strengthen children, families, and communitiesdelivering measurable outcomes through healing, teaching, worship, and play. for more than a century, thompson has transformed lives…
We strive to serve the community by constructing and rehabilitating homes for affordable homeownership, providing new housing rentals for low to moderate wealth families in south carolina, and providing services that aid in all aspects of…
Carolina hill provides safe and caring emergency shelter and supportive services to homeless families focusing efforts to achieve rapid re-housing and developing skills and resources to maintain it.
Goodwill builds pathways that help people pursue the life they want to achieve. goodwill exists to help people see possibilities, seize opportunities, and prosper. we partner with individuals to identify their strengths, interests and…
Empowering south carolina communities and children's advocacy centers to deliver a best practice response to child abuse
We believe: scyap believes that every child has the right to a permanent home and family; that a child's family and community are valuable resources for promoting positive growth and overall development. we serve: scyap promotes the use of…
The mission of Communities In Schools is to surround students with a community of support, empowering them to stay in school and achieve in life.
Our mission is to provide high-quality education and support for children in need through partnership with their families. our vision is to positively affect the future of children at risk by improving economic mobility through education.…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is A Child's Haven Inc and the most unlike its peers is New Mind Health & Care Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 22 years old; the field is 21. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 8% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.5% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
176 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 176 of the 273 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds MILL VILLAGE MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF GREENVILLE COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds SWITCH ↗
- Who funds Prisma Health ↗
- Who funds MEYER CENTER FOR SPECIAL CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds UPSTATE CIRCLE OF FRIENDS ↗
- Who funds PUBLIC EDUCATION PARTNERS GREENVILLE COUNTY ↗
- Who funds MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF SC INC ↗
- Who funds OPERATION AIRDROP INC ↗
- Who funds CALVARY HOME FOR CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds CLARITY INC ↗
- Who funds THE FAMILY EFFECT ↗
- Who funds JASMINE ROAD INC ↗
- Who funds GREER RELIEF AND RESOURCES AGENCY INC ↗
- Who funds GREENVILLE TECH FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds CHRISTMAS SHOES ↗
- Who funds CREATIVE ADVANCEMENT CENTERS INC ↗
- Who funds PENDLETON PLACE INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S CANCER PARTNERS OF THE CAROLINAS INC ↗
- Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF GREENVILLE COUNTY SC INC ↗
- Who funds ALLIANCE FOR THE COLLABORATION WITH THE HISPANIC COMMUNITY ↗
- Who funds Communities in Schools of South Carolina ↗
- Who funds SLEEP IN HEAVENLY PEACE INC ↗
- Who funds GirlUp GVL ↗
- Who funds PREDESTINED TEEN OUTREACH ↗
- Who funds JULIE VALENTINE CENTER ↗
- Who funds JUST SAY SOMETHING INC ↗
- Who funds PROJECT HOST INC ↗
- Who funds SCSDB FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ANGEL FLIGHT SOARS INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Jolley Foundation · United Way of Greenville County Inc · Dabo's All in Team Foundation · Scsymmes Foundation · Daniel-Mickel Foundation · John I Smith Charities Inc · South Carolina Christian Foundation · Sisk Foundation Buncombe St Methodist Church · Charity Ball Board of Greenville · Spinks Family Foundation · Hollingsworth Funds Inc · Spartanburg County Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Scansource Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Arts for Learning Connecticut — 14% of income from government
- Best Buddies International Inc — 4% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Scansource Charitable Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Scansource Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.