Skip to content
The Priddy Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

The Priddy Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$14M
Granted FY2025still arriving
151
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$1.7M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Education$25MHuman Services$12MHealth$8.4MArts & Culture$8.3MFood & Nutrition$5.8MCommunity Improvement$3.6MYouth Development$3.0MAnimals$2.3MOther$0
02FY2025 · 151 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k21 grants · $105k
  • $10k–50k71 grants · $1.8M
  • $50k–250k43 grants · $4.7M
  • $250k+16 grants · $7.6M
$34,160
Median grant
4
States reached
$199M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Midwestern State University$1,726,710
Wichita Falls Area Food Bank$800,000
Catholic Charities of Ft Worth Inc$719,380
Whiteside Museum of Natural History$456,908
Region 9 Education Service Center$428,562
Catholic Charities of Ft Worth Inc$396,312
Region 9 Education Service Center$380,838
Region 9 Education Service Center$375,447
Presbyterian Manor Inc$350,000
Region 9 Education Service Center$346,502
Region 9 Education Service Center$299,716
Region 9 Education Service Center$281,645
Region 9 Education Service Center$269,387
Region 9 Education Service Center$265,815
Catholic Charities of Ft Worth Inc$260,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $11.5M) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 80% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Presbyterian Children's Homes and Services: $90k → 10%Montague County Carpenters Shop Inc (The): $95k → 15%Presbyterian Children's Homes and Services: $50k → 10%Catholic Charities of Ft Worth Inc: $719k → 11%Virginia's House - A Family Resource Center Inc: $83k → 16%Presbyterian Children's Homes and Services: $40k → 10%Catholic Charities of Ft Worth Inc: $400k → 11%Virginia's House - A Family Resource Center Inc: $70k → 16%Operation Christians Assisting Resourcing Encouraging Ministries Inc: $57k → 17%Beautiful Day Foundation: $92k → 19%Hospice of Wichita Falls Inc: $1.0M → 9%Catholic Charities of Ft Worth Inc: $400k → 11%Virginia's House - A Family Resource Center Inc: $68k → 16%Hospice of Wichita Falls Inc: $1.0M → 9%Catholic Charities of Ft Worth Inc: $400k → 11%Virginia's House - A Family Resource Center Inc: $66k → 16%Operation Christians Assisting Resourcing Encouraging Ministries Inc: $46k → 17%Catholic Charities of Ft Worth Inc: $400k → 11%Virginia's House - A Family Resource Center Inc: $65k → 16%Catholic Charities of Ft Worth Inc: $400k → 11%Senior Citizens Activity Center of Burkburnett Inc: $45k → 16%Catholic Charities of Ft Worth Inc: $396k → 11%Virginia's House - A Family Resource Center Inc: $50k → 16%Catholic Charities of Ft Worth Inc: $344k → 11%Catholic Charities of Ft Worth Inc: $337k → 11%Catholic Charities of Ft Worth Inc: $260k → 11%Catholic Charities of Ft Worth Inc: $260k → 11%Catholic Charities of Ft Worth Inc: $250k → 11%Anag Inc: $63k → 9%Catholic Charities of Ft Worth Inc: $250k → 11%Catholic Charities of Ft Worth Inc: $250k → 11%Catholic Charities of Ft Worth Inc: $230k → 11%Catholic Charities of Ft Worth Inc: $181k → 11%Catholic Charities of Ft Worth Inc: $181k → 11%Catholic Charities of Ft Worth Inc: $138k → 11%Young Men's Christian Association of Wichita Falls: $250k → 16%Young Men's Christian Association of Wichita Falls: $150k → 16%Interfaith Ministries of Wichita Falls Inc: $132k → 16%Young Mens Christian Association of Wichita Falls: $100k → 16%Presbyterian Manor Inc: $350k → 16%Arc Texas: $60k → 16%Child Care Inc: $200k → 16%Child Care Inc: $200k → 16%Child Care Inc: $200k → 16%Child Care Inc: $111k → 16%Child Care Inc: $100k → 16%Child Care Inc: $100k → 16%Child Care Inc: $44k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$71M · 146 repeat orgs$5.2M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +27% since the first grant, against +12% for those funded once.

146 repeat relationships: 97 still active in FY2025, 49 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

146
40

Total granted

$71M
$4.6M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+27%
+12%

Still filing today

65%
48%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $609k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesArts & CultureEducationHealthYouth DevelopmentCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CC
    CATHOLIC CHARITIES DIOCESE OF FORT WORTH
    6× · 2020–2025 · $5.8M · revenue ×11
  • WF
    WICHITA FALLS AREA FOOD BANK
    5× · 2020–2025 · $4.8M · revenue +48%
  • HO
    Hospice of Wichita Falls Inc
    2× · 2020–2021 · $2.0M · revenue +18%

Funded once

  • NC
    North Central Texas Community Health Care
    one grant, 2020 · $2.0M
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF THE LAWTON PUBLIC LIBRARY INC
    one grant, 2023 · $408k · revenue -77% · 78% of their budget
  • CA
    Christ Academy (fka The Episcopal School of Wichita Falls Inc)
    one grant, 2020 · $283k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
West Texas Food Bank

The WTFB exists to collect, purchase, and distribute food to feed the hungry in 19 counties in West Texas in partnership with volunteers and community organizations and to educate these partners and the public at large about the real face…

—
2
Childrens Advocacy Center of West Texas Inc

The Organizations mission is to bring unity and efficiency to investigations of child abuse through the use of a multi-disciplinary team and, thereby, to provide the best possible services to victims of child abuse and their families.

Crime & Legal
3
Central Texas Children's Home

To provide family services and to provide residential child care for dependent children where there is a need to assist children and families disrupted by problems.

Human Services
4
Food Bank of West Central Texas

To procure and distribute nutritional food to qualified agencies that feed the hungry of West Central Texas.

Food & Nutrition
5
Meals On Wheels of Odessa Inc

Meals on Wheels of Odessa enables people to live with dignity by offering community support and sustenance through coordinated services and enable older adults to live in their own homes safely and independently as long as they are able.

—
6
Lone Star Casa Inc

Lone Star CASA elevates the voices of children in Kaufman and Rockwall County who have experienced abuse and neglect by providing trained volunteer advocates to work alongside children and families so they can achieve safety and stability…

Civil Rights
7
Caritas of Waco

To provide emergency/supplemental assistance in the form of food, clothing, household items, utility, rent and mortgage aid to people in need in the waco community.also provides case management assistance to people wanting to become…

Human Services
8
Meals On Wheels - Walker Countytx Inc

The center functions to serve senior adults 60 yrs and older. provide programs and services that will enable the individuals to be an integral part of the community and allow them to retain independence dignity and sense of well being

Human Services
9
Meals On Wheels Waco

Meals on wheels waco nourishes the bodies, minds, and spirits of older adults in the heart of texas through meals, transportation, activities, and volunteer support.

Human Services
10
Casa of Williamson County Texas

CASA of Williamson County, TX exists to empower community volunteers to advocate for children who have experienced abuse or neglect to find loving, safe, and permanent homes.

Crime & Legal
11
Children's Aid Society of West Tx Inc

To provide shelter, supervision, and counseling for children in crisis; to cooperate with other agencies in order to resolve problems related to the welfare of these children; to assist the families of these children in seeking possible…

Human Services
12
Compassion Ministries of Waco

It is the mission of the organization to provide services to disadvantaged and homeless families with children; to reintegrate homeless families with children into permanent housing and employment.

Community Improvement
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Senior Citizen Services of North Texas Inc Dba the Kitchen; the most unlike its peers is Senior Citizens Club of Petrolia. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

124 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 124 of the 194 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

31
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
27
Early backer (in before they grew)
121/124
Grantees still filing
86/124
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Midwestern State University: $11,793,868 · OtherMidwestern State UniversityRegion 9 Education Service Center: $10,407,823 · OtherRegion 9 Education Service CenterNorth Central Texas Community Health Care: $2,000,000 · Other+126 more: $23,805,407 · Other+126 moreCATHOLIC CHARITIES DIOCESE OF FORT WORTH: $5,797,123 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC CHARITIES…Hospice of Wichita Falls Inc: $2,000,000 · Human ServicesHospice of Wichita…CHILD CARE INC: $965,018 · Human ServicesCHILD CARE INCYoung Mens Christian Association of Wichita Falls: $500,000 · Human ServicesSENIOR CITIZEN SERVICES OF NORTH TEXAS INC DBA THE KITCHEN: $425,000 · Human Services+19 more: $2,868,236 · Human Services+19 moreWHITESIDE MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY: $1,701,908 · Arts & CultureWichita Falls Alliance for Arts and Culture: $1,074,615 · Arts & CultureWichita Falls Symphony Orchestra: $1,013,540 · Arts & CultureWICHITA FALLS BALLET THEATRE INC: $606,583 · Arts & CultureCHISHOLM TRAIL HERITAGE CENTER ASSOCIATION: $386,680 · Arts & CultureRed River Valley Museum: $285,058 · Arts & CultureWICHITA FALLS YOUTH SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $231,000 · Arts & Culture+6 more: $499,190 · Arts & CultureWICHITA FALLS AREA FOOD BANK: $4,804,779 · Food & Nutrition+3 more: $150,422 · Food & NutritionCONNECTED NATION INC: $1,101,000 · EducationDECATUR LIBRARY FOUNDATION: $310,364 · EducationTHOMPSON SAWYER PUBLIC LIBRARY: $170,021 · EducationCHICO PUBLIC LIBRARY INC: $166,476 · EducationOLNEY COMMUNITY LIBRARY INC: $157,921 · EducationBRIDGEPORT ISD EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $132,000 · EducationRhome Community Library: $129,329 · EducationDepot Public Library: $100,792 · Education+4 more: $126,247 · EducationRathgeber Hospitality House: $496,440 · HealthSTANDING TOGETHER ON METH PREVENTION: $488,409 · HealthFIRST STEP OF WICHITA FALLS INC: $398,609 · HealthABILENE RECOVERY COUNCIL INC: $221,090 · HealthNorth Texas Rehabilitation Center Inc: $220,781 · Health+3 more: $121,176 · HealthPETS LOW COST SPAY & NEUTER: $897,545 · AnimalsWild Bird Rescue Inc: $416,550 · AnimalsINTERNATIONAL EXOTIC ANIMAL SANCTUARY: $378,689 · AnimalsCLAY COUNTY ANIMAL SHELTER INC: $246,642 · Animals
Other$48,007,098Human Services$12,555,377Arts & Culture$5,798,574Food & Nutrition$4,955,201Education$2,394,150Health$1,946,505Animals$1,939,426

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES DIOCESE OF FORT WORTH: $5,797,123 over 6y, 2.4% of budgetWICHITA FALLS AREA FOOD BANK: $4,804,779 over 5y, 13% of budgetHospice of Wichita Falls Inc: $2,000,000 over 2y, 5.1% of budgetWHITESIDE MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY: $1,701,908 over 6y, 92% of budgetWichita Falls Area Community Foundation: $1,195,000 over 6y, 3.9% of budgetCONNECTED NATION INC: $1,101,000 over 5y, 2.9% of budgetWichita Falls Alliance for Arts and Culture: $1,074,615 over 5y, 68% of budgetWichita Falls Symphony Orchestra: $1,013,540 over 6y, 26% of budgetCHILD CARE INC: $965,018 over 6y, 13% of budgetPETS LOW COST SPAY & NEUTER: $897,545 over 5y, 6.7% of budgetCAMP FIRE NORTH TEXAS: $789,650 over 6y, 27% of budgetRiver Bend Nature Works Inc: $748,472 over 4y, 23% of budgetWICHITA FALLS BALLET THEATRE INC: $606,583 over 6y, 36% of budgetCHRIST COUNSELING MINISTRY INC: $586,125 over 6y, 25% of budgetChild Advocates CASA of Red River: $515,550 over 6y, 21% of budgetCenter for Creative Living: $502,772 over 6y, 19% of budgetYoung Mens Christian Association of Wichita Falls: $500,000 over 3y, 4.0% of budgetRathgeber Hospitality House: $496,440 over 6y, 27% of budgetSTANDING TOGETHER ON METH PREVENTION: $488,409 over 4y, 84% of budgetWESTERN TRAIL HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC: $486,349 over 6y, 66% of budgetNORTH TEXAS AREA UNITED WAY INC: $458,698 over 6y, 4.0% of budgetSENIOR CITIZEN SERVICES OF NORTH TEXAS INC DBA THE KITCHEN: $425,000 over 3y, 8.5% of budgetWild Bird Rescue Inc: $416,550 over 4y, 65% of budgetTeen Court Inc: $409,000 over 5y, 41% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE LAWTON PUBLIC LIBRARY INC: $408,116 over 1y, 78% of budgetVIRGINIAS HOUSE A FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER: $401,486 over 6y, 10% of budgetFIRST STEP OF WICHITA FALLS INC: $398,609 over 4y, 15% of budgetCHISHOLM TRAIL HERITAGE CENTER ASSOCIATION: $386,680 over 6y, 80% of budgetINTERNATIONAL EXOTIC ANIMAL SANCTUARY: $378,689 over 3y, 19% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF WICHITA FALLS INC: $373,894 over 5y, 17% of budgetBoys and Girls Club of Vernon Inc: $372,035 over 4y, 9.8% of budgetTHE BOYS CLUB OF WICHITA FALLS INC DBA BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF WICHITA FALLS: $369,479 over 2y, 11% of budgetPresbyterian Manor Inc: $350,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetINTERFAITH MINISTRIES OF WICHITA FALLS INC DBA INTERFAITH OUTREACH SERVICES: $342,014 over 6y, 21% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS LONE STAR: $340,641 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetDECATUR LIBRARY FOUNDATION: $310,364 over 4y, 72% of budgetPatsy's House Children's Advocacy Center: $304,174 over 2y, 24% of budgetCLAY COUNTY SENIOR CITIZENS INC: $300,211 over 6y, 33% of budgetWICHITA ADULT LITERACY COUNCIL INC: $292,055 over 6y, 41% of budgetRed River Valley Museum: $285,058 over 5y, 35% of budgetOPERATION C A R E: $273,886 over 6y, 18% of budgetCHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER FOR NORTH TEXAS INC: $250,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetMARIE DETTY YOUTH & FAMILY SERVICE CENTER INC: $250,000 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetCLAY COUNTY ANIMAL SHELTER INC: $246,642 over 4y, 42% of budgetBOYS CLUB OF BURKBURNETT BURKBURNETT BOYS & GIRLS CLUB: $240,000 over 5y, 7.3% of budgetWICHITA FALLS YOUTH SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $231,000 over 5y, 49% of budgetABILENE RECOVERY COUNCIL INC: $221,090 over 5y, 4.1% of budgetNorth Texas Rehabilitation Center Inc: $220,781 over 1y, 4.9% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES DIOCESE OF FORT WORTH ↗
  • Who funds WICHITA FALLS AREA FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds Hospice of Wichita Falls Inc ↗
  • Who funds WHITESIDE MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY ↗
  • Who funds Wichita Falls Area Community Foundation ↗
  • Who funds CONNECTED NATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Wichita Falls Alliance for Arts and Culture ↗
  • Who funds Wichita Falls Symphony Orchestra ↗
  • Who funds CHILD CARE INC ↗
  • Who funds PETS LOW COST SPAY & NEUTER ↗
  • Who funds CAMP FIRE NORTH TEXAS ↗
  • Who funds River Bend Nature Works Inc ↗
  • Who funds WICHITA FALLS BALLET THEATRE INC ↗
  • Who funds CHRIST COUNSELING MINISTRY INC ↗
  • Who funds Child Advocates CASA of Red River ↗
  • Who funds Center for Creative Living ↗
  • Who funds Young Mens Christian Association of Wichita Falls ↗
  • Who funds Rathgeber Hospitality House ↗
  • Who funds STANDING TOGETHER ON METH PREVENTION ↗
  • Who funds WESTERN TRAIL HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds NORTH TEXAS AREA UNITED WAY INC ↗
  • Who funds SENIOR CITIZEN SERVICES OF NORTH TEXAS INC DBA THE KITCHEN ↗
  • Who funds Wild Bird Rescue Inc ↗
  • Who funds Teen Court Inc ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE LAWTON PUBLIC LIBRARY INC ↗
  • Who funds VIRGINIAS HOUSE A FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds FIRST STEP OF WICHITA FALLS INC ↗
  • Who funds CHISHOLM TRAIL HERITAGE CENTER ASSOCIATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Wichita Falls Area Co…James N McCoy Foundat…Bryant Edwards Founda…The Fain FoundationJ S Bridwell Foundati…Gene Conley FoundationDonnell FoundationGuinn Foundation IncKadane FoundationNorth Texas Area Unit…Perkins-Prothro Found…Libra Foundation
Wichita Falls Area Community FoundationTX99.2× affinity47 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Wichita Falls Area Community Foundation · James N McCoy Foundation · Bryant Edwards Foundation Inc · The Fain Foundation · J S Bridwell Foundation · Gene Conley Foundation · Donnell Foundation · Guinn Foundation Inc · Kadane Foundation · North Texas Area United Way Inc · Perkins-Prothro Foundation · Libra Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Priddy Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Priddy Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 110%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Catholic Charities of the Archdiocese of Oklahoma City Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
11get no government money at all
48report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Priddy Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Priddy Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 194 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Priddy’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home