Skip to content

Minnesota · Private foundation

The Portland Trust II

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$300k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
12
Grants FY2025
12
Organizations funded FY2024
17%
First-time grantees FY2024
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2025
$15,000
Largest grant, FY2025
$80,000
Organizations funded a year
10 to 12
FY2021 to FY2024
States reached, FY2025
4
Total assets, FY2025
$4.7M
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2024, 17% of the organizations The Portland Trust II funded were first-time grantees, receiving 10% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24
PhilanthropyEducationHuman ServicesArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving10$195k0%
FY202412$198k17%
FY202310$165k30%
FY202210$7.0M40%
FY202111$178kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$4.2MPhilanthropy$1.9MHuman Services$1.4MEducation$500kEnvironment$140kHealth$95kEmployment$40kYouth Development$13k

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2021 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Show all 16 grantees

What it could do for these grantees

Plus 4 recipients with no EIN on record ($4.1M), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

The Portland Trust II supplied at least a quarter of the budget for 1 of its grantees at some point. The chart plots its 16 largest grantees; load-bearing ones sit top left.

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUnited Way of Door County Inc: $1,374,751 over 1y, 47% of budgetDoor County YMCA INC: $1,374,748 over 1y, 13% of budgetThe Columbus Academy: $405,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetTeton Youth and Family Services: $95,000 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetNational Museum of Wildlife Art of the United States: $75,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetOne22 Inc: $70,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetThe Children's Learning Center Inc: $40,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetClimb Dba Climb Wyoming: $40,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetEducation Foundation of Jackson Hole: $35,000 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetGrand Teton National Park Foundation: $25,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetOhio State University Foundation: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDancers Workshop: $20,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetThe Art Association of Jackson Hole: $15,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetWrite on Door County Inc: $12,500 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetJackson Hole Conservation Alliance: $5,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetTeton Regional Land Trust Inc: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 16.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of Jackson HoleWY21.8× affinity8 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Jackson Hole · The Brooks Foundation · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc · Elbridge & Evelyn Stuart Foundation · Wonder Institute · Nelson Family Foundation · Robert S & Grayce B Kerr Foundation · Pharos Foundation · Lutsey Family Foundation · Hughes Charitable Foundation · The Wilson Family Foundation · The Andrew Allen Charitable Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare The Portland Trust II with peer funders

About The Portland Trust II

How much does The Portland Trust II give?
The Portland Trust II reported 12 grants totaling $300,000 in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 10 and 12 organizations a year over FY2021 to FY2024.
What does The Portland Trust II fund?
By grant dollars over FY2021 to FY2025, its largest causes are Arts & Culture (51%), Philanthropy (22%), Human Services (17%).
Who are The Portland Trust II's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2021 to FY2025: United Way of Door County Inc ($1.4M), Door County YMCA INC ($1.4M), The Columbus Academy ($405k).
Does The Portland Trust II fund new organizations?
In FY2024, 17% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does The Portland Trust II accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Which funders back the same organizations as The Portland Trust II?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Community Foundation of Jackson Hole, The Brooks Foundation, First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc.
Where is The Portland Trust II based?
The Portland Trust II is based in MN.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Portland Trust II’s filings →

More from the funding graph