· Private foundation
The Portland Trust II
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2021–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k3 grants · $10k
- $10k–50k7 grants · $135k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $155k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF JACKSON HOLE | $80,000 |
| COLUMBUS ACADEMY | $75,000 |
| ONE22 INC | $40,000 |
| THE NATURE CONSERVANCY | $25,000 |
| NATIONAL MUSEUM OF WILDLIFE ART | $25,000 |
| TETON YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES | $15,000 |
| DANCERS WORKSHOP | $10,000 |
| CHILDREN'S LEARNING CENTER | $10,000 |
| THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| FUND FOR PUBLIC EDUCATION | $5,000 |
| TETON VALLEY REGIONAL LAND TRUST | $2,500 |
| WRITE ON DOOR COUNTY | $2,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–25, $110k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +33% since the first grant, against -15% for the ones you funded once.
14 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TCTHE COLUMBUS ACADEMY5× · 2021–2025 · $405k · revenue +20%
- TYTETON YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES4× · 2021–2025 · $95k · revenue +63%
- NMNATIONAL MUSEUM OF WILDLIFE ART OF THE UNITED STATES4× · 2021–2025 · $75k · revenue +101%
Funded once
- WOWRITE ON DOOR DOOR COUNTYone grant, 2022 · $4.1M
- UWUNITED WAY OF DOOR COUNTY INCone grant, 2022 · $1.4M · revenue -15% · 47% of their budget
- DCDoor County YMCA INCone grant, 2022 · $1.4M · revenue -44%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The wyoming wilderness association works to protect wyoming's public wild lands to ensure a future of wild places for people and wildlife.
The jackson hole land trust (jhlt) is a nonprofit that was established in 1980. the land trust's mission is to protect and steward northwest wyoming landscapes for current and future generations. the land trust envisions a legacy of…
We bring science, policy, and proven solutions directly to communities working to restore the integrity and natural connectivity of the landscapes in which they live. (see schedule o)
To fuel local, regional and global tech ecosystems to shape a better future.
Greater yellowstone coalition works with all people to protect the lands, waters, and wildlife of the greater yellowstone ecosystem, now and for future generations.
Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)
The mission of the Jackson hole chamber of commerce is to champion the interest of local businesses, enhance their prosperity and strengthen the economic climate of teton county
The mission of teton valley ranch camp is to provide inspiring western adventure in the jackson hole and yellowstone area.
The wood river land trust's mission is to protect and sustain the treasured landscapes and life-giving waters of the wood river valley and to inspire love for this special place for generations to come.
To conserve, enhance, and encourage the wise use of natural resources. ttcd's core values are to meet the needs of our stakeholders and to foster cooperative relationships.
Jackson hole wildlife foundation advances wildlife conservation driven by science, collaboration, and a community of volunteers.
The door county land trust is a local, non-governmental non-profit organization whose mission is to preserve door county's exceptional lands and waters forever.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Foundation of Jackson Hole and the most unlike its peers is Grand Teton National Park Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF DOOR COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds Door County YMCA INC ↗
- Who funds THE COLUMBUS ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF JACKSON HOLE ↗
- Who funds DOOR COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds TETON YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL MUSEUM OF WILDLIFE ART OF THE UNITED STATES ↗
- Who funds One22 Inc ↗
- Who funds THE CHILDREN'S LEARNING CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds CLIMB DBA CLIMB WYOMING ↗
- Who funds EDUCATION FOUNDATION OF JACKSON HOLE ↗
- Who funds GRAND TETON NATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds DANCERS WORKSHOP ↗
- Who funds The Art Association of Jackson Hole ↗
- Who funds WRITE ON DOOR COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds JACKSON HOLE CONSERVATION ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds TETON REGIONAL LAND TRUST INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Jackson Hole · The Brooks Foundation · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc · Elbridge & Evelyn Stuart Foundation · Wonder Institute · Nelson Family Foundation · Robert S & Grayce B Kerr Foundation · Pharos Foundation · Lutsey Family Foundation · Hughes Charitable Foundation · The Wilson Family Foundation · The Andrew Allen Charitable Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Portland Trust II funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.