· Private foundation
Pharos Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k9 grants · $39k
- $10k–50k16 grants · $235k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $305k
- $250k+2 grants · $662k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| NORTHERN ARIZONA UNIVERSITY FOUNDAT | $400,000 |
| ALL IN EDUCATION | $262,000 |
| THE HERITAGE FOUNDATION | $200,000 |
| MONTCLAIR FOUNDATION INC | $55,000 |
| COMMON SENSE INSTITUTE | $50,000 |
| MENTAL HEALTH & RECOVERY SERVICES | $25,000 |
| TETON YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES | $25,000 |
| HOOVER INSTITUTION | $25,000 |
| MAYO CLINIC | $15,000 |
| VELA EDUCATION FUND | $15,000 |
| CHILDREN'S LEARNING CENTER | $15,000 |
| GRAND TETON MUSIC FESTIVAL | $15,000 |
| BE A LEADER FOUNDATION | $15,000 |
| NEW PATHWAYS FOR YOUTH | $15,000 |
| TEACH FOR AMERICA - PHOENIX | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $560k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 93% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +54% since the first grant, against +34% for the ones you funded once.
40 repeat relationships — 18 still active in FY2024, 22 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 56% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $530k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TPTURNING POINT USA INC2× · 2020–2021 · $1.9M · revenue +190%
THE HERITAGE FOUNDATION3× · 2021–2024 · $1.7M · revenue +32%- ALARIZONA LEADS3× · 2022–2024 · $1.0M · revenue +38% · 69% of their budget
Funded once
- TOTHE OPPORTUNITY TRUST D/B/A ZEST EDUCATIONgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $500k · revenue +54%
- CECITY EDUCATION PARTNERS (SAN ANTONIone grant, 2023 · $500k
- SJSAN JOAQUIN A PLUS INCone grant, 2023 · $500k · revenue -34%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The peak school seeks to ignite a passion for learning, to develop students of diverse talents and backgrounds who think critically and act with integrity, and to graduate compassionate, confident, capable students who will embrace their…
The american enterprise institute is a community of scholars and supporters committed to expanding liberty, increasing individual opportunity, and strengthening free enterprise. aei pursues these ideals through independent thinking and the…
Our mission is to provide a progressive international education and advanced multilingual academics in a safe, diverse, and nurturing environment. our innovative and individualized approach to learning prepares highly motivated students…
Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…
The mission of the silicon schools fund is to improve education through supporting the launch of excellent new schools, improving academic instruction in existing schools, and by funding some of the boldest innovations in education…
Making our government work better is a daunting task, and we are a small organization seeking to transform a government that employs millions of civilians and manages trillions of dollars in taxpayer revenue needed to protect public…
To perform the functions of, or to carry out the purposes of the arizona community foundation, an az nonprofit corporation, so long as the arizona community foundation, inc. remains a qualified organization.
The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.
The american charter schools foundation mission is to promote choice and competition in public education for all students, including those with special needs, and to help them pursue their individual academic goals.
The foreign policy research institute (frpi) is dedicated to producing the highest quality scholarship and nonpartisan policy analysis focused on crucial foreign policy and national security challenges facing the united states. we educate…
Pahara institute strengthens and sustains values-driven leaders who are transforming public education so that every child is prepared to lead a free and fulfilling life.
As the largest association of independent schools, nais co-creates the future of education by uniting and empowering our community. we do this through thought leadership, research, creation and curation of resources, and direct…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Arizona Leads and the most unlike its peers is Phoenix Animal Care Coalition PACC911. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 7% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
70 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 70 of the 97 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CITY FUND ↗
- Who funds TURNING POINT USA INC ↗
- Who funds THE HERITAGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ARIZONA LEADS ↗
- Who funds GREATER PHOENIX CHAMBER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ARIZONA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE OPPORTUNITY TRUST D/B/A ZEST EDUCATION ↗
- Who funds SAN JOAQUIN A PLUS INC ↗
- Who funds Aliento Education Fund ↗
- Who funds ACHIEVEMENT FIRST INC ↗
- Who funds NORTHERN ARIZONA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ARIZONA LATINO LEADERS IN EDUCATION ↗
- Who funds THE CENTER FOR EDUCATION REFORM ↗
- Who funds VISTA COLLEGE PREPARATORY INC ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE VALLEY INC ↗
- Who funds PHOENIX PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds New Pathways For Youth ↗
- Who funds KENT SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds Montclair Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds THE CHILDREN'S LEARNING CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds BE A LEADER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds GRAND TETON MUSIC FESTIVAL INC ↗
- Who funds TETON YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES ↗
- Who funds DESERT BOTANICAL GARDEN INC ↗
- Who funds Central Arts Alliance ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF JACKSON HOLE ↗
- Who funds COMMON SENSE INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds FREEDOMWORKS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds St John's Health Foundation ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Arizona Community Foundation · Burton Family Foundation · Virginia G Piper Charitable Trust · Thunderbirds Charities · Community Foundation of Jackson Hole · Nina Mason Pulliam Charitable Trust · John F Long Foundation Inc · Helios Education Foundation · The Diane and Bruce Halle Foundation · Ellis Center for Educational Excellence · Garcia Family Foundation · Valley of the Sun United Way
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Pharos Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- The Montclair Art Museum — 11% of income from government
- Montclair Foundation Inc — 2% of income from government
- Achievement First Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Pharos Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Pharos Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.