Skip to content
The Plano-Coudon Foundation Inc at a glance

· Public charity

The Plano-Coudon Foundation Inc

Provide charitable giving in the form of direct contributions to selected 501(c)(3) non-profit organizations that serve the communities throughout the baltimore and central maryland region(s).

$44k
Granted FY2025still arriving
2
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$162kPhilanthropy$110kEducation$72kEnvironment$25kHealth$24k
02FY2025 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 2 grants below total $30,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $44,200 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $14,200 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$20,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$73k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL MARYLAND$20,000
ASSOCIATED CATHOLIC CHARITIES INC$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $162k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 96% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%GREENSPRING VILLAGE INC: $6k → 6%RIDERWOOD VILLAGE INC: $8k → 8%RIDERWOOD VILLAGE INC: $5k → 8%RIVERWOOD VILLAGE INC: $5k → 8%OAK CREST VILLAGE INC: $8k → 11%ASSOCIATED CATHOLIC CHARITIES INC: $30k → 19%ASSOCIATED CATHOLIC CHARITIES INC: $27k → 19%ASSOCIATED CATHOLIC CHARITIES INC: $23k → 19%ASSOCIATED CATHOLIC CHARITIES INC: $22k → 19%ASSOCIATED CATHOLIC CHARITIES INC: $20k → 19%ASSOCIATED CATHOLIC CHARITIES INC: $10k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$344k · 5 repeat orgs$49k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +25% since the first grant, against +17% for those funded once.

5 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
6

Total granted

$344k
$49k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+25%
+17%

Still filing today

100%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’25
Human ServicesPhilanthropyEducationEnvironmentHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AC
    ASSOCIATED CATHOLIC CHARITIES INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $131k · revenue +28%
  • TH
    THE HOWARD COUNTY CONSERVANCY INC
    5× · 2018–2023 · $25k · revenue +110%
  • RV
    RIDERWOOD VILLAGE INC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $18k · revenue +25%

Funded once

  • HU
    HELPING UP MISSION INC
    one grant, 2019 · $19k · revenue -51%
  • OC
    OAK CREST VILLAGE INC
    one grant, 2019 · $8k · revenue +15%
  • MP
    MARYVALE PREPARATORY SCHOOL
    one grant, 2020 · $6k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Cedar Crest Village Inc

Mission statement - home is belonging, peace of mind, love and acceptance. welcome home!vision statement - cedar crest village, inc. celebrates aging! grounded in inclusion, innovation and advocacy, we create unparalleled value and…

Housing & Shelter
2
Wind Crest Inc

Mission statement - home is belonging, peace of mind, love and acceptance. welcome home!vision statement - wind crest, inc. celebrates aging! grounded in inclusion, innovation and advocacy, we create unparalleled value and opportunities…

Human Services
3
Tallgrass Creek Inc

Mission statement - home is belonging, peace of mind, love and acceptance. welcome home!vision statement - tallgrass creek, inc. celebrates aging! grounded in inclusion, innovation and advocacy, we create unparalleled value and…

Housing & Shelter
4
Highland Springs Inc

Mission statement - home is belonging, peace of mind, love and acceptance. welcome home!vision statement - highland springs, inc. celebrates aging! grounded in inclusion, innovation and advocacy, we create unparalleled value and…

Housing & Shelter
5
Lantern Hill Inc

Mission statement - home is belonging, peace of mind, love and acceptance. welcome home!vision statement - lantern hill, inc. celebrates aging! grounded in inclusion, innovation and advocacy, we create unparalleled value and opportunities…

Housing & Shelter
6
Eagle's Trace Inc

Mission statement - home is belonging, peace of mind, love and acceptance. welcome home!vision statement - eagle's trace, inc. celebrates aging! grounded in inclusion, innovation and advocacy, we create unparalleled value and opportunities…

Housing & Shelter
7
Ann's Choice Inc

Mission statement - home is belonging, peace of mind, love and acceptance. welcome home!vision statement - ann's choice, inc. celebrates aging! grounded in inclusion, innovation and advocacy, we create unparalleled value and opportunities…

Housing & Shelter
8
Maris Grove Inc

Mission statement - home is belonging, peace of mind, love and acceptance. welcome home!vision statement - maris grove, inc. celebrates aging! grounded in inclusion, innovation and advocacy, we create unparalleled value and opportunities…

Housing & Shelter
9
Ashby Ponds Inc

Mission statement - home is belonging, peace of mind, love and acceptance. welcome home!vision statement - ashby ponds, inc. celebrates aging! grounded in inclusion, innovation and advocacy, we create unparalleled value and opportunities…

Human Services
10
Fox Run Village Inc

Mission statement - home is belonging, peace of mind, love and acceptance. welcome home!vision statement - fox run village, inc. celebrates aging! grounded in inclusion, innovation and advocacy, we create unparalleled value and…

Housing & Shelter
11
Seabrook Village Inc

Mission statement - home is belonging, peace of mind, love and acceptance. welcome home!vision statement - seabrook village, inc. celebrates aging! grounded in inclusion, innovation and advocacy, we create unparalleled value and…

Human Services
12
Linden Ponds Inc

Mission statement - home is belonging, peace of mind, love and acceptance. welcome home!vision statement - linden ponds, inc. celebrates aging! grounded in inclusion, innovation and advocacy, we create unparalleled value and opportunities…

Housing & Shelter
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Greenspring Village Inc; the most unlike its peers is Helping Up Mission Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
7/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ASSOCIATED CATHOLIC CHARITIES INC: $130,500 · Human ServicesASSOCIATED CATHOLIC CHARITIES INCRIDERWOOD VILLAGE INC: $18,000 · Human ServicesRIDERWOOD VILLAGE INCOAK CREST VILLAGE INC: $7,500 · Human ServicesGREENSPRING VILLAGE INC: $6,000 · Human ServicesTHE UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL MARYLAND INC: $110,000 · PhilanthropyTHE UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL MARYL…Teach for America Inc: $60,000 · EducationTeach for America…HELPING UP MISSION INC: $18,736 · OtherMARYVALE PREPARATORY SCHOOL: $6,200 · OtherARCHDIOCESE OF BALTIMORE CHANCERY INC: $5,500 · OtherTHE HOWARD COUNTY CONSERVANCY INC: $25,103 · EnvironmentMt Washington Pediatric Hospital Inc: $5,175 · Health
Human Services$162,000Philanthropy$110,000Education$60,000Other$30,436Environment$25,103Health$5,175

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetASSOCIATED CATHOLIC CHARITIES INC: $130,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTHE UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL MARYLAND INC: $110,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetTeach for America Inc: $60,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HOWARD COUNTY CONSERVANCY INC: $25,103 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetHELPING UP MISSION INC: $18,736 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRIDERWOOD VILLAGE INC: $18,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetOAK CREST VILLAGE INC: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGREENSPRING VILLAGE INC: $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMt Washington Pediatric Hospital Inc: $5,175 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

T Rowe Price Program …Morgan Stanley Global…National Philanthropi…Vanguard Charitable E…Donor Advised Charita…American Online Givin…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
T Rowe Price Program for Charitable Giving IncMD14.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: T Rowe Price Program for Charitable Giving Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Plano-Coudon Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Plano-Coudon Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 5%
  • Associated Catholic Charities Inc: 10% of income from government
  • Helping Up Mission Inc: 6% of income from government
  • The Howard County Conservancy Inc: 5% of income from government
  • The United Way of Central Maryland Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Mt Washington Pediatric Hospital Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Plano-Coudon’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home