· Public charity
The Plano-Coudon Foundation Inc
Provide charitable giving in the form of direct contributions to selected 501(c)(3) non-profit organizations that serve the communities throughout the baltimore and central maryland region(s).
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 2 grants below total $30,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $44,200 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $14,200 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL MARYLAND | $20,000 |
| ASSOCIATED CATHOLIC CHARITIES INC | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $162k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 96% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +25% since the first grant, against +17% for the ones you funded once.
5 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- ACASSOCIATED CATHOLIC CHARITIES INC8× · 2017–2025 · $131k · revenue +28%
- THTHE HOWARD COUNTY CONSERVANCY INC5× · 2018–2023 · $25k · revenue +110%
- RVRIDERWOOD VILLAGE INC3× · 2017–2019 · $18k · revenue +25%
Funded once
- HUHELPING UP MISSION INCone grant, 2019 · $19k · revenue -51%
- OCOAK CREST VILLAGE INCone grant, 2019 · $8k · revenue +15%
- MPMARYVALE PREPARATORY SCHOOLone grant, 2020 · $6k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Mission statement - home is belonging, peace of mind, love and acceptance. welcome home!vision statement - cedar crest village, inc. celebrates aging! grounded in inclusion, innovation and advocacy, we create unparalleled value and…
Mission statement - home is belonging, peace of mind, love and acceptance. welcome home!vision statement - wind crest, inc. celebrates aging! grounded in inclusion, innovation and advocacy, we create unparalleled value and opportunities…
Mission statement - home is belonging, peace of mind, love and acceptance. welcome home!vision statement - tallgrass creek, inc. celebrates aging! grounded in inclusion, innovation and advocacy, we create unparalleled value and…
Mission statement - home is belonging, peace of mind, love and acceptance. welcome home!vision statement - highland springs, inc. celebrates aging! grounded in inclusion, innovation and advocacy, we create unparalleled value and…
Mission statement - home is belonging, peace of mind, love and acceptance. welcome home!vision statement - lantern hill, inc. celebrates aging! grounded in inclusion, innovation and advocacy, we create unparalleled value and opportunities…
Mission statement - home is belonging, peace of mind, love and acceptance. welcome home!vision statement - eagle's trace, inc. celebrates aging! grounded in inclusion, innovation and advocacy, we create unparalleled value and opportunities…
Mission statement - home is belonging, peace of mind, love and acceptance. welcome home!vision statement - ann's choice, inc. celebrates aging! grounded in inclusion, innovation and advocacy, we create unparalleled value and opportunities…
Mission statement - home is belonging, peace of mind, love and acceptance. welcome home!vision statement - maris grove, inc. celebrates aging! grounded in inclusion, innovation and advocacy, we create unparalleled value and opportunities…
Mission statement - home is belonging, peace of mind, love and acceptance. welcome home!vision statement - ashby ponds, inc. celebrates aging! grounded in inclusion, innovation and advocacy, we create unparalleled value and opportunities…
Mission statement - home is belonging, peace of mind, love and acceptance. welcome home!vision statement - fox run village, inc. celebrates aging! grounded in inclusion, innovation and advocacy, we create unparalleled value and…
Mission statement - home is belonging, peace of mind, love and acceptance. welcome home!vision statement - seabrook village, inc. celebrates aging! grounded in inclusion, innovation and advocacy, we create unparalleled value and…
Mission statement - home is belonging, peace of mind, love and acceptance. welcome home!vision statement - linden ponds, inc. celebrates aging! grounded in inclusion, innovation and advocacy, we create unparalleled value and opportunities…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Greenspring Village Inc and the most unlike its peers is Helping Up Mission Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ASSOCIATED CATHOLIC CHARITIES INC ↗
- Who funds THE UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL MARYLAND INC ↗
- Who funds Teach for America Inc ↗
- Who funds THE HOWARD COUNTY CONSERVANCY INC ↗
- Who funds HELPING UP MISSION INC ↗
- Who funds RIDERWOOD VILLAGE INC ↗
- Who funds OAK CREST VILLAGE INC ↗
- Who funds GREENSPRING VILLAGE INC ↗
- Who funds Mt Washington Pediatric Hospital Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: T Rowe Price Program for Charitable Giving Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Plano-Coudon Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Associated Catholic Charities Inc — 10% of income from government
- Helping Up Mission Inc — 6% of income from government
- The Howard County Conservancy Inc — 5% of income from government
- The United Way of Central Maryland Inc — 2% of income from government
- Mt Washington Pediatric Hospital Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.