· Private foundation
The Phileona Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k38 grants · $110k
- $10k–50k10 grants · $170k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $190k
- $250k+2 grants · $1.1M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| MINNEAPOLIS JEWISH FEDERATION | $540,535 |
| MISSION ANIMAL HOSPITAL | $530,400 |
| TEMPLE ISRAEL | $89,500 |
| THE PUBLIC THEATER | $50,000 |
| JEWISH FEDERATION OF BROWARD COUNTY | $50,000 |
| MERIT SPREAD FUNDS | $25,000 |
| REEF RENEWAL USA | $25,000 |
| INDIGENOUS PEOPLES TASK FORCE | $20,000 |
| GUTHRIE THEATER FOUNDATION | $20,000 |
| PLANNED PARENTHOOD | $20,000 |
| THEATER LATTE DA | $17,000 |
| AVIVO | $12,000 |
| WALKER ART CENTER | $10,500 |
| SOS OUTREACH | $10,000 |
| PLANNED PARENTHOOD ACTION FUND INC | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $293k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 56% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +23% since the first grant, against +3% for the ones you funded once.
99 repeat relationships — 35 still active in FY2024, 64 since wound down; 15 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $67k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- MAMISSION ANIMAL HOSPITAL7× · 2018–2024 · $1.7M · revenue +65%
- GTGUTHRIE THEATER FOUNDATION6× · 2019–2024 · $260k · revenue +46%
Nova Southeastern University Inc2× · 2018–2020 · $170k · revenue +39%
Funded once
- THTHE HISPANIC INSTITUTEone grant, 2020 · $75k · revenue -37%
- UOUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA SCHOOL OF VETERINARY MEDICINEone grant, 2018 · $73k
- SFSHALOM FOUNDATIONone grant, 2021 · $50k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Minnesota fringe connects adventurous artists with adventurous audiences by creating open, supportive forums for free and diverse artistic expression.
MCF is a vibrant philanthropic community connecting, strengthening and mobilizing the power of philanthropy to advance prosperity and equity.
The minnesota business partnership's mission is to maintain a high quality of life for all minnesotans by ensuring that the state's economy remains strong, globally competitive and its prospects for growth bright by working with elected…
The minnesota chamber of commerce proactively leads the business community statewide to: advance pro-business, responsible minnesota public policy that creates jobs and grows the econony; provde member services to address evolving business…
The npr foundation ("foundation") is organized and operated exclusively for the benefit of its sole supported organization, national public radio, inc. ("npr inc."). the foundation supports npr inc. through various activities such as…
To attract, recruit, advance, and retain attorneys of color in the twin cities through education and collaboration with member organizations.
To be the leading voice of medicine to make minnesota the healthiest state and the best place to practice.
Arts Midwest works collaboratively with private and public arts supporters to support, inform, and celebrate arts organizations and creative communities across the Midwest. Our mission is to build unprecedented opportunity across the…
National public radio, inc. ("npr") works collaboratively with member public radio station licensees ("member stations") to create a more informed public, one that is challenged and invigorated by a deeper understanding and appreciation of…
Stages makes plays and tells stories that invite everyone to live more deeply and love more boldly.
The american theatre guild is dedicated to providing the experience of live theatre to foster passion, inspire creativity and empower youth within our communities.
To create an extraordinary downtown minneapolis, applying the core values of leadership, collaboration, advocacy and innovation.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Minneapolis Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Motorsport Safety Foundation Corp. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 20. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 17% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
160 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 160 of the 198 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds MISSION ANIMAL HOSPITAL ↗
- Who funds MINNEAPOLIS JEWISH FEDERATION ↗
- Who funds THE MINNEAPOLIS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds GUTHRIE THEATER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds NRDC ACTION FUND INC ↗
- Who funds Nova Southeastern University Inc ↗
- Who funds The Constellation Fund ↗
- Who funds SUSTAINABLE MARKETS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SHOLOM FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ARTHRITIS NATIONAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SING FOR HOPE INC ↗
- Who funds THEATER LATTE DA ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S HEALTH CARE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Sea Turtle Oversight Protection Inc ↗
- Who funds INDIGENOUS PEOPLES TASK FORCE ↗
- Who funds THE HISPANIC INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds NEW YORK SHAKESPEARE FESTIVAL ↗
- Who funds UNIDOS MINNESOTA EDUCATION FUND ↗
- Who funds WALKER ART CENTER ↗
- Who funds SOS OUTREACH ↗
- Who funds BUG PERFORMANCE AND MEDIA ART CENTER ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL MARINE SANCTUARY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds AVIVO ↗
- Who funds MIDWAY CONTEMPORARY ART ↗
- Who funds THE PINK AGENDA INC ↗
- Who funds GIRAFFE CONSERVATION FOUNDATION USA ↗
- Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD ACTION FUND INC ↗
- Who funds PET HAVEN INC OF MINNESOTA ↗
- Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF ORANGE COUNTY ↗
- Who funds WILDLIFE REHABILITATION CENTER OF MINNESOTA ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Minneapolis Foundation · Saint Paul & Minnesota Foundation · The McKnight Foundation · Otto Bremer Trust · Minnesota Community Foundation · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · Target Foundation · Ch Robinson Worldwide Foundation · Linsmayer James B Fdn Tr-Main · Xcel Energy Foundation · The Head Family Foundation · Margaret a Cargill Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Phileona Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- National Marine Sanctuary Foundation — 88% of income from government
- The Coral Restoration Foundation Inc — 16% of income from government
- Burlington City Arts Foundation Inc — 6% of income from government
- The Center for Independent Documentary Inc — 6% of income from government
- Nova Southeastern University Inc — 2% of income from government
- Giraffe Conservation Foundation Usa — 2% of income from government
- Eugene O'neill Memorial Theater Center Inc — 1% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Phileona Foundation?
Find your warmest path to The Phileona Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.