· Public charity
The Philadelphia Poverty Action Fund
THE PHILADELPHIA POVERTY ACTION FUND provides funding & administers grants to non-profit organizations & partnerships in order to connect individuals & families to important economic security programs, public benefits workforce programs that can help lift them out of poverty & help ensure equitable economic recovery in philadelphia.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2021–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 4 grants below total $1,844,512 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $2,056,681 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $212,169 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- $50k–250k1 grant · $150k
- $250k+3 grants · $1.7M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| GREATER PHILA COMMUNITY ALLIANCE | $664,574 |
| AFRICAN CULTURAL ALLIANCE OF N AMERICA | $529,938 |
| LOCAL INITIATIVES SUPPORT CORP PHILA | $500,000 |
| BEECH COMMUNITY SRVCS | $150,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–25, $6.0M) land where the poverty rate runs at 22%, against an area that typically sits at 16%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
19 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2025, 15 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- GPGREATER PHILADELPHIA COMMUNITY ALLIANCE4× · 2021–2025 · $5.6M · revenue +361% · 35% of their budget
LOCAL INITIATIVES SUPPORT CORPORATION4× · 2022–2025 · $3.6M · revenue +25%- CFCampaign for Working Families Inc3× · 2021–2024 · $3.0M · revenue +62% · 49% of their budget
Funded once
- ACAFRICAN-AMERICAN CULTURAL ALLIANCEgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $1.4M · revenue +177%
- PLPHILADELPHIA LAWYERS OF SOCIAL EQUITYone grant, 2023 · $399k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2021 · $300k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Building support for the rights of working people through coalitions of labor and community and through public education.
Enforcing and protecting the rights of individuals and families by providing accessible, creative, and high quality legal assistance and working collaboratively for systemic change.
The Frankford Community Development Corporation FCDC is dedicated to the asset-based development of Lower Northeast Philadelphia by focusing on job creation affordable and workforce housing development improving awareness and outcomes…
Philadelphia works, inc. develops and manages smart workforce solutions that respond to business needs and increases economic opportunity for all philadelphia residents.
The Public Interest Law Center uses high-impact legal strategies to advance the civil, social, and economic rights of communities in the Philadelphia region facing discrimination, inequality, and poverty. We use litigation, community…
The corporation's mission includes, but is not limited to, combatingcommunity deterioration within chinatown; preserving and developingthe chinatown community; leading the community in neighborhoodplanning, considering land use, and…
None
Driving change from the ground up, the urban affairs coalition (uac) unites government, business, neighborhoods, and individual initiatives to improve the quality of life in the region, build wealth in urban communities, and solve emerging…
To combat community deterioration and promote education.
Together for West Philadelphia partners with healthcare systems community-based organizations, academic institutions, and public and private stakeholders to achieve equitable health outcomes for West Philadelphians.
Dignity Housing's mission is to break the cycle of homelessness and poverty that confronts low-income families and individuals in the City of Philadelphia.
Provides information and support to unemployed and low-income individuals. organizing the unemployed to unite with labor, religious, organizations, and the community to advocate for jobs and economic justice.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Greater Philadelphia Community Alliance and the most unlike its peers is Reawakening Agency. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 7% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 6% lost their exemption, against 16% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
32 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 32 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds GREATER PHILADELPHIA COMMUNITY ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds LOCAL INITIATIVES SUPPORT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds Campaign for Working Families Inc ↗
- Who funds AFRICAN CULTURAL ALLIANCE OF NORTH AMERICA ↗
- Who funds AFRICAN-AMERICAN CULTURAL ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds PHILADELPHIA LAWYERS FOR SOCIAL EQUITY ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY LEGAL SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds Beech Community Services ↗
- Who funds DEFENDER ASSOCIATION OF PHILADELPHIA ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY LEGAL SERVICES ↗
- Who funds UPLIFT SOLUTIONS INC ↗
- Who funds NO-MO ↗
- Who funds FEDERATION OF NEIGHBORHOOD CENTERS ↗
- Who funds Ashland Little League ↗
- Who funds Eastern North Philadelphia Workforce Development Corp ↗
- Who funds URBAN LEAGUE OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA ↗
- Who funds Fathers Day Rally Committee Inc ↗
- Who funds REAWAKENING AGENCY ↗
- Who funds CEIBA INC ↗
- Who funds PHILADELPHIA FIGHT ↗
- Who funds New Kensington Community Development Corp ↗
- Who funds MAKE IT HAPPEN PHILLY INC ↗
- Who funds PHILADELPHIA BAIL FUND INC ↗
- Who funds SOUTHWEST COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COR ↗
- Who funds Beyond Literacy ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY OF COMPASSION INC ↗
- Who funds JEVS HUMAN SERVICES ↗
- Who funds EVERY MURDER IS REAL ↗
- Who funds RESTAURANT OPPORTUNITIES CENTERS UNITED INC ↗
- Who funds Soul Food Community Development Corporation Inc ↗
- Who funds First Step Staffing Inc ↗
- Who funds XIENTE ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: United Way of Greater Philadelphia and Southern New Jersey · The William Penn Foundation · The Philadelphia Foundation · Philadelphia City Fund Inc · The Patricia Kind Family Foundation · The Barra Foundation Inc · Bread and Roses Community Fund · Philanthropy Network Greater Philadelphia · Scattergood Behavioral Health Foundation · Independence Public Media of Philadelphia Inc · Philadelphia Works Inc · Independence Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Philadelphia Poverty Action Fund funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Philadelphia Poverty Action Fund?
Find your warmest path to The Philadelphia Poverty Action Fund through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.