· Public charity
Philanthropy Network Greater Philadelphia
To strengthen philanthropy in order to create a more vibrant, resilient, and equitable region.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2019–2022.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CHILDREN'S FIRST PA | $85,849 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–22, $342k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 93% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +65% since the first grant, against +38% for the ones you funded once.
25 repeat relationships — 0 still active in FY2022, 25 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2022, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $86k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
URBAN AFFAIRS COALITION2× · 2020–2021 · $43k · revenue +68%- PCPHILADELPHIA CHINATOWN DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION2× · 2019–2021 · $36k · revenue +42%
- ACAFRICAN CULTURAL ALLIANCE OF NORTH AMERICA2× · 2019–2021 · $36k · revenue +285%
Funded once
- PPPHILADELPHIA PUBLIC ACCESS CORPORATIONone grant, 2020 · $37k · revenue +16%
- CGCULTURETRUST GREATER PHILADELPHIAone grant, 2021 · $29k · revenue -30%
MIGHTY WRITERSgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $28k · revenue +53%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Pcca's mission is to strengthen households and communities by developing and preserving homeownership and affordable housing, and educating consumers to increase accessability to economic opportunities.
) to lead and engage in campaigns that empower Black workers to advance our rights and improve job quality in key employment sectors
Ajapo's mission is to provide a continuum of care which empowers refugees and immigrants to become self-sufficient and integrated into the greater pittsburgh community in allegheny county. ajapo is a refugee resettlement agency providing…
Vision: PACDC works to create an equitable city where every Philadelphian lives works and thrives in a neighborhood that offers an excellent quality of life. Mission: PACDC is a membership association, that fosters strong community…
The Frankford Community Development Corporation FCDC is dedicated to the asset-based development of Lower Northeast Philadelphia by focusing on job creation affordable and workforce housing development improving awareness and outcomes…
To promote the welfare of puerto rican / latino residents of the greater philadelphia area through their health, human serivces and community development programs.
Hiv/aids counseling/assistance
The Garden Court Community Association (GCCA) is an organization of individuals and families living and working in the Garden Court neighborhood in West Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Since the mid 1950's, GCCA has worked to foster, promote,…
Eastern north philadelphia workforce development corporation ("enpwdc") is a non-profit corporation serving the hispanic community of north philadelphia. enpwdc's primary mission is to assist individuals and families in achieving economic…
Building support for the rights of working people through coalitions of labor and community and through public education.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Greater Philadelphia Cultural Alliance and the most unlike its peers is Dominican Parade Y Festival of Phil. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 25 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 16% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
114 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 114 of the 136 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Children First PA ↗
- Who funds URBAN AFFAIRS COALITION ↗
- Who funds PHILADELPHIA PUBLIC ACCESS CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds PHILADELPHIA CHINATOWN DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds AFRICAN CULTURAL ALLIANCE OF NORTH AMERICA ↗
- Who funds Nueva Esperanza Inc ↗
- Who funds CULTURETRUST GREATER PHILADELPHIA ↗
- Who funds MIGHTY WRITERS ↗
- Who funds ASIAN AMERICANS UNITED INC ↗
- Who funds GENERATIONS ON LINE ↗
- Who funds Lancaster Avenue 21st Century Business Association ↗
- Who funds ETHIOPIAN COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA ↗
- Who funds ACHIEVEABILITY ↗
- Who funds SOUTHEAST ASIAN MUTUAL ASSISTANCE ASSOCIATIONS COALITION INC ↗
- Who funds URBAN LEAGUE OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA ↗
- Who funds ACLAMO ↗
- Who funds COMMON FUTURE ↗
- Who funds THE PHILIP JAISOHN MEMORIAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PUENTES DE SALUD ↗
- Who funds FIRST PERSON ARTS INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY VOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE ↗
- Who funds HUNTING PARK NAC ↗
- Who funds KITHS INTEGRATED AND TARGETED HUMAN SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds EQUITY PROJECT ↗
- Who funds Asian Arts Initiative ↗
- Who funds NATIONALITIES SERVICE CENTER OF PHILADELPHIA ↗
- Who funds JUST ACT INC ↗
- Who funds Korean American Association of Greater Philadelphia ↗
- Who funds ANTI-VIOLENCE PARTNERSHIP OF PHILADELPHIA ↗
- Who funds AFRICAN &MIDDLE EASTERN CENTERS FOR HEALTH & DEVEO ↗
- Who funds BRANDYWINE VALLEY ACTIVE AGING ↗
- Who funds Women Walking In Victory Service Center ↗
- Who funds PENNSYLVANIA HEALTH ACCESS NETWORK ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY LEARNING CENTER ↗
- Who funds CEIBA INC ↗
- Who funds DEBRE GENET KIDUS AMANUEL AND KIDIST MARIAM ETHIOPIAN ORTHODOX TEWAHIDO CHU ↗
- Who funds PATRICIAN SOCIETY OF CENTRAL NORRISTOWN ↗
- Who funds CONNECTEDLY ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Philadelphia Foundation · Scattergood Behavioral Health Foundation · The William Penn Foundation · United Way of Greater Philadelphia and Southern New Jersey · Bread and Roses Community Fund · Philadelphia City Fund Inc · The Patricia Kind Family Foundation · The Barra Foundation Inc · Henrietta Tower Wurts Memorial Foundation · Independence Foundation · W W Smith Charitable Trust · Independence Public Media of Philadelphia Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Philanthropy Network Greater Philadelphia funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.