Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Pete and Jenny Jones Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$13k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$4k
Largest
01What it funds
0157% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Youth Development$234kReligion$138kEducation$22kHealth$6kHuman Services$4kInternational$4kArts & Culture$3kRecreation & Sports$530Other$0
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,800
Median grant
4
States reached
$45k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LITTLE P PROJECT$4,300
Individual grant recipient$3,000
THE SHINING STARS SCHOOL$2,800
YOUNG LIFE$1,200
WINGS ALOFT$1,000
INTERVARSITY CHRISTIAN$615
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY25–25, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%WINGS ALOFT: $1k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
WI
NY
CA
UT
CO
VA
NM
NC
OK
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 95% of The Pete and Jenny Jones Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 27% of the giving stays in UT; by stated purpose, 1%.

The Pete and Jenny Jones Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$489k · 17 repeat orgs$83k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +66% since the first grant, against +16% for those funded once.

17 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
22

Total granted

$489k
$82k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+66%
+16%

Still filing today

18%
32%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
ReligionEducationHealthYouth DevelopmentRecreation & SportsPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • YL
    YOUNG LIFE
    9× · 2017–2025 · $235k · revenue +59%
  • LP
    Little p Project
    4× · 2022–2025 · $10k · revenue +98%
  • TS
    THE SHINING STARS SCHOOL
    5× · 2018–2025 · $8k · revenue +66%

Funded once

  • BC
    BIG CANYON RANCH INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $50k · revenue +206%
  • A
    ANTIOCH
    one grant, 2017 · $8k
  • OB
    OKLAHOMA BAPTIST UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2024 · $5k · revenue -21%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Colorado Christian Academy

Colorado christian academy provides an innovative christ-centered education that prioritizes academic achievements and individual development of the whole child. in relationship with parents, we will build healthy foundations that result…

Education
2
Center for Christian Growth Inc

The mission of t bar m camps is to present jesus christ teach his ways and represent him through an exciting enthusiastic and encouraging camp and retreat experience

—
3
Children's Cancer Research Fund

Children's cancer research fund fuels transformational research to bring better treatments and cures to children with cancer.

Philanthropy
4
Bibleproject

Bibleproject's mission is to help people experience the bible as a unified story that leads to jesus. this is achieved by creating biblical videos to be regularly released on a newly-created youtube channel. (continued on schedule o.)each…

Religion
5
Apt Ministries

To train pastors/leaders in africa who have little or no formal training and resources. teach them how to study and prepare bible-based messages using the thompson chain reference study bible and to provide bible to trained pastors/leaders.

Religion
6
Westminster Theological Seminary

The formation of men for the gospel ministry as pastors, evangelists, & teachers who shall proclaim the whole counsel of god throughout a changing world. the theological training of church officers as stewards of christ, and the…

—
7
Texas Scottish Rite Hospital for Crippled Children

To provide the highest quality care to improve the lives of children with orthopedic and related conditions and specific learning disabilities. texas scottish rite hospital for children focuses on patient care, research and education.

Health
8
Arizona Christian University

Arizona christian university provides a biblically-integrated, liberal arts education equipping graduates to serve the lord jesus christ in all aspects of life, as leaders of influence and excellence.

Education
9
Phoenix Children's Hospital Foundation

Phoenix children's hospital foundation supports phoenix children's hospital through fundraising ensuring that the hospital continues to stay on the leading edge of pediatric medicine and is equipped to fulfill its mission to advance hope,…

Health
10
Providence Christian School of Texas

To provide academically able students with a challenging educational experience designed to help them know, love and practice that which is true, good and excellent, and to prepare them to live purposefully and intelligently in the service…

Education
11
Wipe Out Kids' Cancer Inc

Wipe out kids cancer offers comfort and hope to kids with cancer through support programs serving the entire family and funds innovative research leading to new discoveries and treatments in the fight against pediatric cancer. "support and…

—
12
Children's Health Care

We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Young Life; the most unlike its peers is Wings Aloft Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 40 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/12
Grantees still filing
7/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ANTIOCH MINISTRIES INTERNATIONAL: $67,974 · OtherANTIOCH MINISTRIES INTERNATIONALIndividual grant recipient: $53,600 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $45,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientALLEGRO: $21,660 · OtherALLEGROINTERVARSITY CHRISTIAN: $8,915 · Other+23 more: $59,712 · Other+23 moreYOUNG LIFE: $234,766 · Youth DevelopmentYOUNG LIFEBIG CANYON RANCH INC: $50,000 · ReligionBIG CANYON…+2 more: $2,500 · ReligionTHE SHINING STARS SCHOOL: $8,255 · EducationOKLAHOMA BAPTIST UNIVERSITY: $5,182 · EducationPARK CITY READS: $2,070 · EducationLittle p Project: $10,417 · Health+1 more: $305 · HealthWINGS ALOFT: $1,000 · Human ServicesNATIONAL ABILITY CENTER: $200 · Recreation & SportsMARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION: $100 · Philanthropy
Other$256,861Youth Development$234,766Religion$52,500Education$15,507Health$10,722Human Services$1,000Recreation & Sports$200Philanthropy$100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetYOUNG LIFE: $234,766 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetLittle p Project: $10,417 over 4y, 2.3% of budgetTHE SHINING STARS SCHOOL: $8,255 over 5y, 1.9% of budgetOKLAHOMA BAPTIST UNIVERSITY: $5,182 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPARK CITY READS: $2,070 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetAPOSTLES CHURCH INC: $1,500 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetWINGS ALOFT: $1,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetCHRISTIAN CENTER OF PARK CITY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $305 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL ABILITY CENTER: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds YOUNG LIFE ↗
  • Who funds BIG CANYON RANCH INC ↗
  • Who funds Little p Project ↗
  • Who funds THE SHINING STARS SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds OKLAHOMA BAPTIST UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds PARK CITY READS ↗
  • Who funds APOSTLES CHURCH INC ↗
  • Who funds WINGS ALOFT ↗
  • Who funds CHRISTIAN CENTER OF PARK CITY ↗
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL ABILITY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds MARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Natl Christian Charitable Fdn IncGA10.3× affinity7 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Pete and Jenny Jones Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Pete and Jenny Jones Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 40 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Pete and Jenny Jones’ filings →

    More from the funding graph