· Private foundation
The Pearle and Glen Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k8 grants · $33k
- $10k–50k4 grants · $54k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $150k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| AUDUBON RECREATION FOUNDATION INC | $100,000 |
| EXIRA-ELK HORN-KIMBALLTON COMMUNITY SCHOOL DISTRICT | $50,000 |
| RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE ORANGE COUNTY | $23,690 |
| MOHAVE COMMUNITY COLLEGE BIGHORN BOOSTER CLUB | $10,000 |
| LUTHERAN CHURCH OF OUR SAVIOR | $10,000 |
| LUTHERAN CHURCH OF OUR SAVIOR | $10,000 |
| MOHAVE COMMUNITY COLLEGE BIGHORN BOOSTER CLUB | $5,000 |
| KIMBARK ELEMENTARY (SB CITY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT) | $5,000 |
| HOPE (HONORING OPPORTUNITIES FOR PERSONAL EMPOWERMENT) | $5,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $5,000 |
| MOHAVE SUNRISE ROTARY CLUB | $5,000 |
| MOHAVE SUNRISE ROTARY CLUB | $5,000 |
| WOUNDED WARRIORS PROJECT (MISSION K9 RESCUE) | $2,000 |
| BRYANT STREET BAPTIST CHURCH | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $50k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +69% since the first grant, against +36% for the ones you funded once.
16 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 13 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 13% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $206k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC4× · 2018–2023 · $48k · revenue +46%- PVPARALYZED VETERANS OF AMERICA - IOWA CHAPTER4× · 2019–2023 · $46k · revenue +2%
THE HERITAGE FOUNDATION2× · 2019–2022 · $32k · revenue +9%
Funded once
DIRECT RELIEFone grant, 2022 · $100k · revenue +8%- EFEXIRA FIRE EMS ASSOCIATION INCone grant, 2022 · $82k · revenue -6% · 75% of their budget
- ACAUDUBON COUNTY AGRICULTURAL SOCIETYone grant, 2023 · $25k · revenue -4%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Preservation of civil liberties through litigation and public education.
Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.
American gas association's (the association) mission is to develop and advocate for informed, innovative, and durable policy that fulfills our nation's energy needs, environmental aspirations and economic potential. we are committed to…
Ahip is the national trade association representing the health insurance industry. ahip's members provide health care coverage, services and solutions to more than 200 million americans. we are committed to market-based solutions and…
The air & space forces association (afa) is a nonprofit, independent, professional military, and aerospace education association. the association's mission is to promote dominant u.s. air and space forces as the foundation of a strong…
The association serves its members by creating resources that enable california school administrators to develop and apply creative leadership and management skills and in turn, improve the educational process for all students.
The california dental association is committed to the success of our members in service to their patients and the public.
Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…
The american arbitration association ("aaa") is dedicated to effective, efficient and economical methods of dispute resolution through education, technology and solutions-oriented service.
The mission of the aclu foundation of arizona is to defend and preserve, through litigation and public education, individual rights and freedoms guaranteed to all by the constitution and the laws of the united states and arizona.
The AIA California, in collaboration with local components, is the voice of the architectural profession.
Help improve policy and decision making through research and analysis.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Heritage Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Wma Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 27 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
34 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 34 of the 59 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds AUDUBON RECREATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds DIRECT RELIEF ↗
- Who funds EXIRA FIRE EMS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds PARALYZED VETERANS OF AMERICA - IOWA CHAPTER ↗
- Who funds THE HERITAGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds REDLANDS COMMUNITY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds AUDUBON COUNTY AGRICULTURAL SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ↗
- Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
- Who funds Leadership Institute ↗
- Who funds Sam and Alfreda Maloof Foundation For Arts and Crafts ↗
- Who funds EXIRA CARE CENTER ↗
- Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds DONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC ↗
- Who funds THE CRPA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Conservative Partnership Institute ↗
- Who funds AUTISM SOCIETY OF IOWA ↗
- Who funds NISHNA PRODUCTIONS INC ↗
- Who funds Young America's Foundation ↗
- Who funds TURNING POINT USA INC ↗
- Who funds MOUNTAIN RIGHT TO LIFE INC ↗
- Who funds LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: BHHS Legacy Foundation · California Community Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Pearle and Glen Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Wounded Warrior Project Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.