Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Paul and Joellen Imre Foundation Inc

Its FY2021 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$36k
Granted FY2021
2
Grants FY2021
1
States reached
$18k
Largest
01What you fund
0188% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20182021.

Arts & Culture$55kEducation$43kAnimals$41kHousing & Shelter$20kYouth Development$18kFood & Nutrition$6kHealth$6kPhilanthropy$4kOther$0
02FY2021 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$18,280
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BARCS$18,280
WIDE ANGLE YOUTH MEDIA INC$18,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–20, $16k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%COVENANT HOUSE CALIFORNIA: $10k → 14%COVENANT HOUSE CALIFORNIA: $5k → 14%ART WITH A HEART INC: $1k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

62%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$130k · 8 repeat orgs$79k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +67% since the first grant, against +63% for the ones you funded once.

8 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2021, 7 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2021 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
23

Total granted

$130k
$61k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+67%
+63%

Still filing today

75%
65%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2021, 50% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $18k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21
AnimalsHuman ServicesEducationYouth DevelopmentArts & CultureHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WA
    WIDE ANGLE YOUTH MEDIA INC
    3× · 2019–2021 · $46k · revenue +147%
  • TM
    THE MARYLAND SPCA INC
    3× · 2018–2020 · $19k · revenue +2%
  • CH
    COVENANT HOUSE CALIFORNIA
    2× · 2019–2020 · $15k · revenue +67%

Funded once

  • THE ATTIC YOUTH CENTERgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $13k · revenue +45%
  • BS
    BALTIMORE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA - ORCH KIDS
    one grant, 2020 · $6k
  • TRUE COLORS UNITED INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $5k · revenue +72%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Philadelphia Animal Welfare Society

Dedicated to saving philadelphias homeless and at-risk pets through rescue, adoption, and provision of veterinary care and other pet owner support services.

Animals
2
Washington Humane Society

The washington humane society protects animals, supports families, and advocates for positive change to create a world where all animals can thrive. we enrich the humanity of our communities by promoting compassion and encouraging people…

Animals
3
Baltimore Corps Inc

To cultivate career advancement opportunities for local talent, facilitate talent acquisition for local employers, increase access to capital for local entrepreneurs' social ventures, and foster cross-sector collaboration to address city…

Employment
4
Baltimore Hunger Project Llc

Baltimore hunger project removes the barriers to learning by providing food and resources to children facing food insecurity in our community.

Human Services
5
City Wildlife Inc

The goals of City Wildlife are to rescue sick, orphaned, and injured wild animals and return them to the wild; to promote the enjoyment of and harmonious co-existence with native wildlife; and to protect the District of Columbias wild…

Education
6
The Arc Baltimore Inc

The arc baltimore supports people with developmental disabilities to lead fulfilling lives with a sense of belonging, purpose, and meaningful relationships.

Human Services
7
Animal Care and Control of New York City Inc

Animal care centers of nyc's (acc) mission is to end animal homelessness in nyc.

Animals
8
Animal Haven Inc

Animal haven is a nonprofit organization that finds homes for dogs and cats throughout the tristate area. it operates out of its adoption center in lower manhattan which has facilities for dog training and grooming as part of the adoption…

Animals
9
Michigan Humane Society

To improve and save lives through compassionate care, community engagement and advocacy for animals.

Animals
10
Marin Humane Society

Marin humane transforms lives through exceptional animal care, humane education, and advocacy. every day, marin humane inspires compassion and positive relationships between people and animals.

Animals
11
Manna House Inc

To offer assistance and support to the homeless, poor and needy of baltimore with services contributing toward their independence and stability.

12
Friends for Animals of Metro Detroit

The friends are dedicated to the rescue, protection, and adoption of companion animals in need while inspiring the human-animal bond. we meet our mission by:-saving 100% of healthy and treatable animals.-providing high-quality animal care…

Animals

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Maryland Spca Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Feline Rescue Association Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 25 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%4%<5yr16%4%5–10yr19%26%10–20yr16%26%20–35yr11%26%35–55yr16%13%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%1%<5yr16%1%5–10yr19%17%10–20yr16%52%20–35yr11%18%35–55yr16%12%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/24
the rest of the field
14%
5,903/41,825

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/22
Grantees still filing
19/22
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

THE ST PAULS SCHOOLS INC — $27,500 · OtherTHE ST PAULS SCHOOLS INCBALTIMORE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA - ORCH KIDS — $6,000 · OtherBALTIMORE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA - ORCH KI…Individual grant recipient — $3,250 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $3,000 · OtherLOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK — $2,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $2,500 · OtherNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF BLACK JOURNALISTS OF LA — $2,500 · OtherTRUE COLORS UNITED INC — $5,000 · OtherTRUE COLORS UNITED INCThe William S Baer School — $4,000 · OtherThe William S Baer SchoolAsylee Women Enterprise Inc — $3,000 · OtherNew Alternatives for LGBT Homeless Youth Inc — $2,500 · OtherPhilabundance — $2,500 · Other+6 more — $6,056 · Other+6 moreWIDE ANGLE YOUTH MEDIA INC — $46,200 · Arts & CultureWIDE ANGLE YOUTH MEDIA IN…THE MARYLAND SPCA INC — $18,500 · AnimalsTHE MARYLAND SPCA INCBALTIMORE ANIMAL RESCUE AND CARE SHELTER BARCS — $18,280 · AnimalsBALTIMORE ANIMAL RESC…FLATBUSH CATS INC — $1,500 · Animals+3 more — $2,000 · AnimalsCOVENANT HOUSE CALIFORNIA — $15,000 · Human ServicesArt With a Heart Inc — $1,000 · Human ServicesTHE ATTIC YOUTH CENTER — $12,500 · Youth DevelopmentTHE BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF METROPOLITAN BALTIMORE — $3,000 · Youth DevelopmentBALTIMORE DESIGN SCHOOL INC — $12,500 · EducationJAMES MADISON UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC — $2,500 · EducationBELIEVE IN TOMORROW NATIONAL CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION — $5,500 · Health
Other$70,306Arts & Culture$46,200Animals$40,280Human Services$16,000Youth Development$15,500Education$15,000Health$5,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetWIDE ANGLE YOUTH MEDIA INC — $46,200 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetTHE MARYLAND SPCA INC — $18,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetBALTIMORE ANIMAL RESCUE AND CARE SHELTER BARCS — $18,280 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE CALIFORNIA — $15,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBALTIMORE DESIGN SCHOOL INC — $12,500 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetTHE ATTIC YOUTH CENTER — $12,500 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetBELIEVE IN TOMORROW NATIONAL CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION — $5,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetThe William S Baer School — $4,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetAsylee Women Enterprise Inc — $3,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF METROPOLITAN BALTIMORE — $3,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetNew Alternatives for LGBT Homeless Youth Inc — $2,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetLOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJAMES MADISON UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPhilabundance — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFLATBUSH CATS INC — $1,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSECOND CHANCE INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MARYLAND FOOD BANK INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HUMANE SOCIETY OF BALTIMORE COUNTY INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetANIMAL CARE AND CONTROL TEAM — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Baltimore Community Foundation IncMD25.5× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Baltimore Community Foundation Inc · The United Way of Central Maryland Inc · Sherman Family Foundation · T Rowe Price Program for Charitable Giving Inc · Annie E Casey Foundation Inc · Fund for Educational Excellence Inc · France-Merrick Foundation Inc · The Abell Foundation Inc · Associated Jewish Charities of Baltimore · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Baltimore Orioles Foundation Inc · David & Barbara B Hirschhorn Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Paul and Joellen Imre Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 60%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 4%
  • Asylee Women Enterprise Inc26% of income from government
  • The Maryland Food Bank Inc11% of income from government
  • Art With a Heart Inc4% of income from government
  • Wide Angle Youth Media Inc3% of income from government
  • The Boys and Girls Clubs of Metropolitan Baltimore2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Paul and Joellen Imre Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to The Paul and Joellen Imre Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph