Skip to content
The Page Southerland Page Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

The Page Southerland Page Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$50k
Granted FY2025still arriving
1
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
04Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Education$205kHealth$98kFood & Nutrition$21kHousing & Shelter$18kPublic Safety & Disaster$5kRecreation & Sports$5kYouth Development$5kCommunity Improvement$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$50,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$723k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Ohio State University College of Engineering Office of Advancement$50,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–20, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%River City Youth Foundation: $5k → 10%City Square: $3k → 14%Target Hunger INC: $3k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
NY
OH
CA
CO
AZ
DC
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Cook Children's Health Plan

Knowing that every child's life is sacred, our promise is to improve the health of every child in our region through the prevention and treatment of illness, disease, and injury.

Health
2
Cook Children's Medical Center

Knowing that every child's life is sacred, our promise is to improve the health of every child in our region through the prevention and treatment of illness, disease and injury.

Health
3
Dallas Citizens Council

To lead and serve in the moments that matter the most for the people of dallas.

—
4
Cook Children's Physician Network

Knowing that every child's life is sacred, our promise is to improve the health of every child in our region through the prevention and treatment of illness, disease, and injury.

Health
5
United Food Bank

United Food Bank unites communities to alleviate hunger.

Food & Nutrition
6
Cook Children's Medical Center - Prosper

Knowing that every child's life is sacred, our promise is to improve the health of every child in our region through the prevention and treatment of illness, disease and injury.

Health
7
Banner -University Medical Group

Assist banner health complete its mission to make health care easier so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.

Health
8
Texas Children's Hospital Foundation

To create a healthier future for children and women throughout our global community by leading in patient care, education and research.

Health
9
University Health Inc

Primary functions are the coordination and delivery of health care resources and services, health care education for the hospital service area, long range analysis of health care needs and development of programs, and arranging for…

—
10
St Joseph's Hospital of Tampa Foundation Inc

St. joseph's hospitals foundation secures, manages and stewards philanthropic support to benefit the health care mission of st. joseph's hospital, st. joseph's women's hospital, st. joseph's children's hospital of tampa, st. joseph's…

Health
11
Dallas-Fort Worth Hospital Council

The mission of the Dallas-Fort Worth Hospital Council is to drive evidence-based improvement in patient care and health equity throughout the region.

—
12
Children's Hospital Corporation

Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Communities Foundation of Texas Inc; the most unlike its peers is Christ House. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/24
Grantees still filing
18/24
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

University of Houston: $100,000 · OtherUniversity of HoustonOhio State University College of Engineering Office of Advancement: $50,000 · OtherOhio State University College of Engineering Office of AdvancementUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON: $50,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTONSEARCH HOMELESS SERVICES: $10,000 · Other+7 more: $28,500 · Other+7 moreTHE METHODIST HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $60,000 · HealthTHE METHODIST HOSPITAL FOUN…Baylor Health Care System Foundation: $10,000 · HealthBaylor Health Care System F…Texas Children's Hospital: $10,000 · HealthTexas Children's HospitalPHOEBE FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 · HealthPHOEBE FOUNDATION INC+2 more: $5,000 · Health+2 moreDriscoll Children's Hospital Development Foundation: $5,000 · Philanthropy22KILL: $2,500 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITIES FOUNDATION OF TEXAS INC: $2,500 · PhilanthropyVALLEY OF THE SUN UNITED WAY: $1,500 · PhilanthropyRIVER CITY YOUTH FOUNDATION: $5,000 · Human ServicesTarget Hunger Inc: $2,500 · Human ServicesCITYSQUARE: $2,500 · Human ServicesChrist House: $5,000 · Housing & ShelterCOMMUNITY HOUSING PARTNERSHIP: $3,000 · Housing & ShelterCAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK INC: $5,000 · Food & NutritionFOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES: $2,500 · Food & NutritionWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $5,000 · International
Other$238,500Health$90,000Philanthropy$11,500Human Services$10,000Housing & Shelter$8,000Food & Nutrition$7,500International$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE METHODIST HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $60,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBaylor Health Care System Foundation: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTexas Children's Hospital: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDENVER CIVIC VENTURES INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHUDSON VALLEY COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPHOEBE FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRIVER CITY YOUTH FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetChrist House: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Trail Conservancy: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetDriscoll Children's Hospital Development Foundation: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMOBILE LOAVES & FISHES INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY HOUSING PARTNERSHIP: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO FOOD BANK: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget22KILL: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTarget Hunger Inc: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITIES FOUNDATION OF TEXAS INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBanner Health Foundation: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCITYSQUARE: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetChildren's Hospital Colorado Foundation: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVALLEY OF THE SUN UNITED WAY: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Enterprise Holdings F…The Bank of America C…Jpmorgan Chase Founda…American Online Givin…Charities Aid Foundat…Network for GoodMorgan Stanley Global…Vanguard Charitable E…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Enterprise Holdings FoundationMO11.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Enterprise Holdings Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · Network for Good · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Page Southerland Page Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Page Southerland Page Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    12report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Page Southerland Page Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Page Southerland Page Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Page Southerland Page’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home