Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

The Outdoor Art Club Inc

To preserve the natural scenery of mill valley and the surrounding country, to beautify the grounds around public buildings, to work against the wanton destruction of birds and game, to encourage the development of outdoor art and to engage in other civic, literary and charitable work.

$30k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Philanthropy$31kCrime & Legal$22kFood & Nutrition$20kEducation$18kHuman Services$12kHealth$12kCommunity Improvement$10kArts & Culture$7kOther$0
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $20k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$7,575
Median grant
1
States reached
$3.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
EXTRAFOOD$10,000
PROJECT AVERY INC$7,575
TAMALPAIS HIGH SCHOOL$6,000
NAMI$6,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY24–24, $12k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%MARIN VILLAGES: $5k → 8%VIVALON: $7k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

63%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$72k · 4 repeat orgs$43k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +26% since the first grant, against +7% for the ones you funded once.

4 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
6

Total granted

$72k
$43k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+26%
+7%

Still filing today

75%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’23’24’25
Human ServicesCrime & LegalArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PA
    PROJECT AVARY INC ALTERNATIVE VENTURES FOR AT RISK YOUTH
    3× · 2023–2025 · $22k · revenue +65%
  • E
    Extrafood
    2× · 2024–2025 · $20k · revenue +26%
  • RH
    REDWOOD HIGH SCHOOL
    3× · 2023–2025 · $18k

Funded once

  • MV
    MILL VALLEY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +82%
  • MP
    MARIN PERFORMING STARSgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $7k · revenue +29%
  • W
    WILDCARE
    one grant, 2024 · $7k · revenue 0%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Transportation Alternatives for Marin
Public Benefit
2
Marin Open Studios

Marin open studios is a non-profit visual arts organization dedicated to engaging and supporting marin county artists and their audiences through events, programs and services. marin open studios champions a diverse and inclusive community…

Arts & Culture
3
Marin Advocates for Children

Marin Advocates mission is to prevent abuse and to advocate for the best interest of children.

4
The Multicultural Center of Marin

We connect community members to advocate for social and environmental justice for all to thrive. We accomplish our mission through the provision of services in the areas of Community Resilience, Youth & Families, Basic Needs Support, and…

Human Services
5
Marin Humane Society

Marin humane transforms lives through exceptional animal care, humane education, and advocacy. every day, marin humane inspires compassion and positive relationships between people and animals.

Animals
6
Marin Cultural Association

To support art and culture in Marin County, including enhancing the programs and facilities at the Marin Center and Marin County Fair.

Arts & Culture
7
Marin Brain Injury Network Schurig Center for Brain Injury Recovery

Provide continued rehabilitation, hope, and community for people affected by brain injury.

8
Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute
9
Marin Museum of Bicycling

To illuminate and celebrate cycling's past present and future.

Human Services
10
Marin Ventures

The mission of Marin Ventures is to serve adults with developmental disabilities by fostering independence, personal growth, and promoting the opportunity for community integration based upon individual need.Marin Ventures is an Adult…

Human Services
11
Marin Made
Environment
12
Senior Access

Senior Access's mission is to help Marin's older and disabled adults remain independent and part of the community for as long as possible.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Marin Community Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Marin Performing Stars. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
6/10
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

REDWOOD HIGH SCHOOL — $18,000 · OtherREDWOOD HIGH SCHOOLNAMI MARIN Inc — $12,000 · OtherNAMI MARIN IncMILL VALLEY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE INC — $9,728 · OtherMILL VALLEY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE INCWILDCARE — $7,200 · OtherWILDCAREMARIN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $30,500 · PhilanthropyMARIN COMMUNITY FOUNDAT…PROJECT AVARY INC ALTERNATIVE VENTURES FOR AT RISK YOUTH — $21,713 · Crime & LegalPROJECT AVARY IN…Extrafood — $20,000 · Food & NutritionExtrafoodVivalon — $7,000 · Human ServicesVivalonMarin Villages — $5,013 · Human ServicesMarin Vil…MARIN PERFORMING STARS — $7,300 · Arts & CultureCALL OF THE SEA — $6,600 · Youth Development
Other$46,928Philanthropy$30,500Crime & Legal$21,713Food & Nutrition$20,000Human Services$12,013Arts & Culture$7,300Youth Development$6,600

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMARIN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $30,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPROJECT AVARY INC ALTERNATIVE VENTURES FOR AT RISK YOUTH — $21,713 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetExtrafood — $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNAMI MARIN Inc — $12,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetMILL VALLEY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE INC — $9,728 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetMARIN PERFORMING STARS — $7,300 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetWILDCARE — $7,200 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetVivalon — $7,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCALL OF THE SEA — $6,600 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetMarin Villages — $5,013 over 1y, 1.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Marin Community FoundationCA19.1× affinity7 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Marin Community Foundation · McNabb Foundation · Leonard & Beryl Buck Foundation · Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Outdoor Art Club Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph