· Public charity
The Ohio Foundation of Independent Colleges
To solicit contributions from the corporate community and private foundations on behalf of 33 member-college/universities that serve nearly 80,000 students.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 90 grants below total $2,761,061 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $3,181,335 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $420,274 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k39 grants · $259k
- $10k–50k32 grants · $840k
- $50k–250k19 grants · $1.7M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| KENYON COLLEGE | $185,371 |
| DENISON UNIVERSITY | $179,560 |
| OBERLIN COLLEGE | $147,117 |
| THE COLLEGE OF WOOSTER | $120,035 |
| OTTERBEIN UNIVERSITY | $95,536 |
| FRANKLIN UNIVERSITY | $92,822 |
| CEDARVILLE UNIVERSITY | $90,971 |
| PURDUE UNIVERSITY | $83,831 |
| LAKE ERIE COLLEGE | $77,311 |
| JOHN CARROLL UNIVERSITY | $69,497 |
| OHIO NORTHERN UNIVERSITY | $67,630 |
| BALDWIN WALLACE UNIVERSITY | $66,004 |
| UNIVERSITY OF MOUNT UNION | $60,846 |
| UNIVERSITY OF FINDLAY | $57,312 |
| TIFFIN UNIVERSITY | $56,653 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 81% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +20% since the first grant, against +17% for the ones you funded once.
94 repeat relationships — 65 still active in FY2025, 29 since wound down; 19 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $161k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CUCedarville University9× · 2017–2025 · $756k · revenue +90%
Oberlin College9× · 2017–2025 · $715k · revenue +41%- DUDENISON UNIVERSITY9× · 2017–2025 · $711k · revenue +39%
Funded once
- UUURBANA UNIVERSITYone grant, 2017 · $58k
- BUBRATTLEBORO UNION HIGH SCHOOLone grant, 2022 · $26k
- YSYOUNGSTOWN STATE UNIVERSITY ASSOCIATION OF PROFESSIONAL STAFFone grant, 2023 · $24k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…
Trinity university is an independent co-educational university whose mission is excellence in the interrelated areas of teaching, research and services.
Benedictine University is an inclusive academic community dedicated to teaching and learning, scholarship and service, truth and justice, as inspired by the Catholic intellectual tradition, the social teaching of the Church, and the…
The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.
Xavier is a jesuit catholic university rooted in the liberal arts tradition. our mission is to educate each student intellectually, morally, and spiritually. we create learning opportunities through rigorous academic and professional…
As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.
At Roger Williams University, students are prepared to be thinkers and doers ready to solve challenging problems with innovative solutions. RWU offers robust offerings of undergraduate, graduate and professional programs across eight…
Wake Forest University, a 501(c)(3) institution of higher education, is dedicated to the pursuit of excellence in the liberal arts and in graduate and professional education. The organization is comprised of seven constituent parts: Wake…
Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.
See schedule o.we are inspired by the ideals of our founder who, in 1896, emphasized respect for all people and ideas, who honored knowledge with practice, progress and the common good. our historical commitment to experiential learning…
Education - lagrange college challenges the minds and inspires the souls of its students. founded in 1831 and committed to its relationship with the united methodist church and its wesleyan and liberal arts traditions, the college supports…
To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Muskingum University and the most unlike its peers is Albany College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 78 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
130 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 130 of the 214 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Cedarville University ↗
- Who funds Oberlin College ↗
- Who funds DENISON UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds Baldwin Wallace University ↗
- Who funds KENYON COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds John Carroll University ↗
- Who funds ASHLAND UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds FRANKLIN UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds Otterbein University ↗
- Who funds The University of Findlay ↗
- Who funds THE COLLEGE OF WOOSTER ↗
- Who funds CAPITAL UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds University of Mount Union ↗
- Who funds Ohio Northern University ↗
- Who funds FRANCISCAN UNIVERSITY OF STEUBENVILLE ↗
- Who funds Walsh University Inc ↗
- Who funds THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF WITTENBERG COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds Mount Vernon Nazarene University ↗
- Who funds MUSKINGUM UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds Wilmington College ↗
- Who funds OHIO DOMINICAN UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds OHIO WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds Marietta College ↗
- Who funds Heidelberg University ↗
- Who funds LAKE ERIE COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds MALONE UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds HIRAM COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds LOURDES UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds Bluffton University ↗
- Who funds NOTRE DAME COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds DEFIANCE COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds URSULINE COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds University of Dayton ↗
- Who funds Tiffin University ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: National Collegiate Athletic Association · Folds of Honor Foundation · Council of Independent Colleges · Tulsa Community Foundation · Columbus Foundation · The Community Foundation of Louisville Inc · American Chemical Society · The Dayton Foundation · John B & Brownie Young Memorial Fund · Community Foundations Inc · I Know I Can · Ibm International Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Ohio Foundation of Independent Colleges funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Trustees of Tufts College — 11% of income from government
- Johns Hopkins University — 11% of income from government
- Worcester Polytechnic Institute — 6% of income from government
- Trustees of Boston College — 2% of income from government
- Nova Southeastern University Inc — 2% of income from government
- Wesleyan University — 1% of income from government
- Assumption University — 1% of income from government
- The Trustees of the Smith College — 0% of income from government
- The Trustees of Mount Holyoke College — 0% of income from government
- Western New England University — 0% of income from government
- Springfield College — 0% of income from government
- Berklee College of Music Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.