· Private foundation
The Offield Family Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 98 grants below total $5,598,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $6,000,000 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $402,000 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2023
- Under $10k15 grants · $82k
- $10k–50k47 grants · $923k
- $50k–250k32 grants · $3.1M
- $250k+4 grants · $1.5M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| MCLAREN NORTHERN MICHIGAN FOUNDATION | $500,000 |
| OFFIELD CENTER FOR BILLFISH STUDIES | $450,000 |
| PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF MICHIGAN | $285,000 |
| NORTHLIGHT THEATRE INC | $250,000 |
| FIRST DESCENTS | $200,000 |
| THE ART OF ELYSIUM | $200,000 |
| J.F. SHEA THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER, INC. | $200,000 |
| SURFRIDER FOUNDATION | $160,000 |
| INTERNATIONAL GAME FISH ASSOCIATION INC | $150,000 |
| LOS ANGELES NOMADIC DIVISION | $150,000 |
| WOMEN'S RESOURCE CENTER OF NORTHERN MICHIGAN | $102,500 |
| NORTHWEST MICHIGAN HABITAT FOR HUMANITY | $100,000 |
| CHP 11-99 FOUNDATION | $100,000 |
| FOUNDATION OF PHILANTHROPIC FUNDS | $100,000 |
| CROOKED TREE ARTS COUNCIL INC. | $100,000 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +31% since the first grant, against +15% for the ones you funded once.
97 repeat relationships — 76 still active in FY2023, 21 since wound down; 17 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2023, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $495k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- LALOS ANGELES NOMADIC DIVISION5× · 2019–2023 · $925k · revenue +697% · 74% of their budget
PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF MICHIGAN3× · 2021–2023 · $912k · revenue +126%- HHHARBOR HALL FOUNDATION5× · 2019–2023 · $870k · revenue +86%
Funded once
- PPPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF WEST & NORTHERN MIone grant, 2019 · $328k
- ZSZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF SAN DIEGOone grant, 2019 · $63k · revenue +4%
- RFREADMOND FRIENDSHIP & CROSS VILLAGE FIRE & RESCUE ASSOCIATIONgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $52k · revenue +124%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The los angeles conservancy is a nonprofit membership organization that works through education and advocacy to recognize, preserve, and revitalize the historic architectural and cultural resources of los angeles county.
The aquarium of the pacific's mission is to instill a sense of wonder, respect, and stewardship for the pacific ocean, its inhabitants, and ecosystems.
The uc santa barbara foundation actively works to further the goals of the university of california, santa barbara. the foundation seeks to maintain and nurture the university's quality and distinction. on behalf of the campus, the…
To promote philanthropy to make santa cruz county a better place to live, now and in the future.we bring together people, ideas, and resources to inspire philanthropy and accomplish great things.
California ocean science trust (ost) is a non-profit organization dedicated to accelerating progress towards a healthy and productive ocean future for california. created by state legislation, ost bridges the gap between cutting-edge…
Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.
The ucla foundation is the giving, receiving, and investing arm of the ucla campus. the foundation enables private donors to help build, sustain and advance one of the world's finest academic and research institutions. private philanthropy…
Serves the mission of the university by supporting and engaging in research, entrepreneurship, community service, sponsored programs and the acquisition of private resources.
The san diego foundation inspires enduring philanthropy and enables community solutions to improve the quality of life in our region.
Marin humane transforms lives through exceptional animal care, humane education, and advocacy. every day, marin humane inspires compassion and positive relationships between people and animals.
California college of the arts educates students to shape culture and society through the practice and critical study of art, architecture, design, and writing. benefitting from its san francisco bay area location, the college prepares…
To protect and steward in perpetuity the unique natural, cultural, and asthetic resources of the preserve and serve as a model of ecologically sustainable development to committees outside the preserve.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Santa Barbara Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Pfleger Institute of Environmental Research. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 18% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.7% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
143 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 143 of the 155 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds MCLAREN NORTHERN MICHIGAN FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds LOS ANGELES NOMADIC DIVISION ↗
- Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF MICHIGAN ↗
- Who funds OFFIELD CENTER FOR BILLFISH STUDIES ↗
- Who funds HARBOR HALL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds JF SHEA THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER INC FKA FRAN JOSWICK THERAP RIDING CTR INC ↗
- Who funds THE ART OF ELYSIUM ↗
- Who funds SANTA CATALINA ISLAND CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL GAME FISH ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE SURFRIDER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CROOKED TREE ARTS COUNCIL INC ↗
- Who funds Womens Resource Center of Northern Michigan Inc ↗
- Who funds NORTHLIGHT THEATRE INC ↗
- Who funds OCEANA INC ↗
- Who funds THE PEREGRINE FUND INC ↗
- Who funds VISTAMAR SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds Pfleger Institute of Environmental Research ↗
- Who funds FIRST DESCENTS ↗
- Who funds THE WILLOWS COMMUNITY SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds CHP 11-99 FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HARBOR SPRINGS AREA HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds NORTHWEST MI HABITAT FOR HUMANITY ↗
- Who funds THE BRICK ↗
- Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD ADVOCATES OF MI ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ↗
- Who funds INDUSTRIAL ARTS INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds THE MUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART LOS ANGELES ↗
- Who funds FJC ↗
- Who funds ARMAND HAMMER MUSEUM OF ART AND CULTURAL CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds MUSEUM ASSOCIATES ↗
- Who funds Top of Michigan Trails Council ↗
- Who funds HIGH ARCTIC INSTITUTE INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds LAGUNA CANYON FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE BILLFISH FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INC ↗
- Who funds NEW ENGLAND SCIENCE & SAILING FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds CATALINA SEA BASS FUND INC ↗
- Who funds Greater Harbor Springs Area Planning Resource Group dba Harbor Inc ↗
- Who funds PETOSKEY-HARBOR SPRINGS AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Petoskey-Harbor Springs Area Community Foundation · Frey Foundation · Charlevoix County Community Foundation · Triford Foundation · Charles Stewart Mott Foundation · Oleson Foundation · Orange County Community Foundation · Henry E & Consuelo S Wenger Foundation Inc · Tom and Ellen Noneman Foundation Co Plante Moran Trust · The Summers Foundation Inc · Affordable Housing Management Foundation · Baiardi Family Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Offield Family Foundation?
Find your warmest path to The Offield Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.