Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Baiardi Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$556k
Granted FY2025still arriving
62
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$70k
Largest
01What you fund
0197% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Health$1.6MEducation$944kHuman Services$281kEnvironment$220kFood & Nutrition$217kPublic Safety & Disaster$131kArts & Culture$112kPhilanthropy$111kOther$0
02FY2025 · 62 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k47 grants · $147k
  • $10k–50k12 grants · $230k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $180k
$3,500
Median grant
3
States reached
$7.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MUNSON HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION$70,000
EASTERSEALS MORC$60,000
PREGNANCY CARE CENTER$50,000
MCLAREN NORTHERN MICHIGAN FOUNDATIO$45,000
THE HAVEN MICHIGAN (PREGCARE CENTE$25,000
ST VINCENT DE PAUL SOCIETY$25,000
BARBARA ANN KARMANOS CANCER INSTITU$25,000
UNIV OF MICH MEDICAL SCHOOL$20,000
UNIV OF MICH MEDICAL SCHOOL$20,000
HARBOR SPRINGS PUBLIC SCHOOLS$15,000
EMMET COUNTY SHERIFF DEPT$12,500
NORTHERN MICHIGAN EQUINE THERAPY$12,000
RESORT BEAR CREEK FIRE DEPT$10,000
NWMI HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$10,000
BARBARA ANN KARMANOS CANCER INSTITU$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $101k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 25% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%NORTHERN MICHIGAN EQUINE THERAPY: $12k → 9%NORTHERN MICHIGAN EQUINE THERAPY: $8k → 9%NORTHERN MICHIGAN EQUINE THERAPY: $8k → 9%NORTHERN MICHIGAN EQUINE THERAPY: $7k → 9%NORTHERN MICHIGAN EQUINE THERAPY: $5k → 9%NORTHERN MICHIGAN EQUINE THERAPY: $5k → 9%NORTHERN MICHIGAN EQUINE THERAPY: $5k → 9%NORTHERN MICHIGAN EQUINE THERAPY: $4k → 9%NORTHERN MICHIGAN EQUINE THERAPY: $3k → 9%NORTHERN MICHIGAN EQUINE THERAPY: $2k → 9%BLUMS LANDING: $10k → 12%NORTHERN MICHIGAN EQUINE THERAPY: $2k → 9%BLUMS LANDING: $5k → 12%BLUMS LANDING: $3k → 12%NORTHERN MICHIGAN EQUINE THERAPY: $1k → 9%BLUMS LANDING: $2k → 12%BLUMS LANDING: $1k → 12%BLUMS LANDING: $1k → 12%BLUMS LANDING: $1k → 12%BLUMS LANDING: $1k → 12%BLUMS LANDING: $1k → 12%BLUMS LANDING: $1k → 12%PETOSKEY MONTESSORI CHILDRENS HOUSE: $9k → 9%NEHEMIAH PROJECT: $4k → 9%NEHEMIAH PROJECT: $3k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 6% of Baiardi Family Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 99% of the giving stays in MI; read by stated purpose it is 92% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Baiardi Family Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$3.7M · 75 repeat orgs$458k to everyone else

75 repeat relationships — 42 still active in FY2025, 33 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

75
42

Total granted

$3.7M
$284k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+23%
+44%

Still filing today

32%
14%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 69% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $174k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesEducationYouth DevelopmentArts & CultureCommunity ImprovementOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HH
    HARBOR HALL FOUNDATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $285k · revenue +207%
  • LT
    Little Traverse Conservancy Inc
    9× · 2017–2025 · $129k · revenue +95%
  • TM
    THE MANNA FOOD PROJECT INC DBA - THE MANNA FOOD PROJECT
    6× · 2017–2022 · $106k · revenue +23%

Funded once

  • OU
    OAKLAND UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2023 · $100k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $25k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $12k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Northern Michigan University Foundation

The nmu foundation will establish and foster relationships to generate resources that benefit the strategic goals of northern michigan university.

Education
2
Michigan Science Center

The mission of the michigan science center is to inspire curious minds of all ages to discover, explore and appreciate science, technology, engineering and math in a creative, dynamic learning environment.

Education
3
Michigan Maritime Museum Inc

The organization is dedicated to preservation of michigan great lakes and waterways, maritime history and culture, and provides maritime education opportunities to the public through permanent and changing exhibits, research library, and…

Arts & Culture
4
Harbor Country Chamber of Commerce

To promote business and economic development for eight towns in southwest michigan.

5
Michigan Heroes Museum

To teach & perpetuate the history of military accomplishments of citizens of the state of michigan and to maintain a museum for that purpose.

Arts & Culture
6
Land Conservancy of West Michigan

Our mission is conserving West Michigans ecologically critical land. We protect land by creating public nature preserves, providing support to communities and local governments in creating natural areas, and helping private landowners…

Environment
7
Michilimackinac Historical Society

To preserve, record and maintain the historical information of the area between michigan's upper and lower peninsulas, known as michilimackinac.

8
The Flint Children's Museum

To inspire a love for learning in science, technology, engineering, math, and art, and awaken imagination through hands-on play.

Arts & Culture
9
Michigan Pharmacy Foundation

To advance pharmacy through education, practice innovation and research focused on patient care, for the improvement and promotion of public health and public education.

Philanthropy
10
Business Leaders for Michigan

Business leaders for michigan is a nonprofit, nonpartisan statewide organization driven by ceos from the state's leading employers, all working toward a shared goal: making michigan a top 10 state for jobs, talent and a thriving economy.…

11
Business Leaders for Michigan Foundation

Business leaders for michigan is a nonprofit, nonpartisan statewide organization driven by ceos from the state's leading employers, all working toward a shared goal: making michigan a top 10 state for jobs, talent and a thriving economy.…

Community Improvement
12
Legacy Land Conservancy

Safeguard southern michigan's land and water to support diverse, resilient, and thriving communities - forever

Environment

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of Michigan and the most unlike its peers is The Bottomless Toy Chest Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadySchool Support and Developm…Faith-Based Community Servi…Animal Rescue and CareDetroit Neighborhood Develo…Professional Membership Org…Industry Trade AssociationsNorthern Michigan Conservat…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 21 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number24%10%<5yr15%8%5–10yr19%30%10–20yr16%13%20–35yr13%28%35–55yr13%13%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value24%27%<5yr15%9%5–10yr19%33%10–20yr16%4%20–35yr13%22%35–55yr13%5%55yr+

The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 10% of your grantees by number, and just 27% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 2% lost their exemption, against 16% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
2%1/45
the rest of the field
16%
3,316/21,115

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

35 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 35 of the 127 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
11
Early backer (in before they grew)
34/35
Grantees still filing
23/35
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

UNIV OF MICH MEDICAL SCHOOL — $290,000 · OtherUNIV OF MICH MEDICAL SCHOOLNCMC FOUNDATION — $276,000 · OtherNCMC FOUNDATIONWAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY — $215,000 · OtherWAYNE STATE UNIVERSITYPREGNANCY CARE CENTER OF CHAR-EM IN — $110,000 · OtherST FRANCIS XAVIER PARISH — $109,675 · OtherAUBURN HILLS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $106,500 · OtherTHE MANNA FOOD PROJECT INC DBA - THE MANNA FOOD PROJECT — $106,000 · OtherOAKLAND UNIVERSITY — $100,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $98,695 · Other+96 more — $1,430,520 · Other+96 moreMCLAREN NORTHERN MICHIGAN FOUNDATION — $452,500 · HealthMCLAREN NORTHER…BARBARA ANN KARMANOS CANCER INSTITUTE — $70,000 · HealthBARBARA ANN KAR…MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF MICHIGAN — $31,500 · HealthMAKE-A-WISH FOU…+2 more — $13,500 · HealthHARBOR HALL FOUNDATION — $285,000 · Community ImprovementHARBOR HA…ST MARY - ST PAUL MINISTRY — $72,500 · Community ImprovementST MARY -…Little Traverse Conservancy Inc — $128,500 · EnvironmentTIP OF THE MITT WATERSHED COUNCIL — $15,000 · EnvironmentNORTHERN MICHIGAN EQUINE THERAPY — $59,881 · Human ServicesBLUM'S LANDING INC — $25,000 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC — $10,000 · Human ServicesTHE PETOSKEY MONTESSORI CHILDREN'S HOUSE — $9,000 · Human ServicesTHE NEHEMIAH PROJECT — $7,203 · Human ServicesINDUSTRIAL ARTS INSTITUTE INC — $63,600 · EducationHarbor Springs Library — $9,000 · EducationALPENA COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $8,000 · EducationLITERATURE CIRCLE SOCIETY — $3,500 · Education+1 more — $1,009 · EducationRaven Hill Discovery Center — $30,359 · Arts & CultureICEBREAKER MACKINAW MARITIME MUSEUM — $10,000 · Arts & Culture+1 more — $1,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$2,842,390Health$567,500Community Improvement$357,500Environment$143,500Human Services$111,084Education$85,109Arts & Culture$41,359

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMCLAREN NORTHERN MICHIGAN FOUNDATION — $452,500 over 9y, 1.0% of budgetHARBOR HALL FOUNDATION — $285,000 over 9y, 5.5% of budgetLittle Traverse Conservancy Inc — $128,500 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetTHE MANNA FOOD PROJECT INC DBA - THE MANNA FOOD PROJECT — $106,000 over 6y, 1.8% of budgetST MARY - ST PAUL MINISTRY — $72,500 over 9y, 21% of budgetBARBARA ANN KARMANOS CANCER INSTITUTE — $70,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetINDUSTRIAL ARTS INSTITUTE INC — $63,600 over 7y, 1.8% of budgetNORTHERN MICHIGAN EQUINE THERAPY — $59,881 over 9y, 4.6% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF MICHIGAN — $31,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetHARBOR SPRINGS COMMUNITY FOOD PANTRY — $31,243 over 9y, 5.3% of budgetRaven Hill Discovery Center — $30,359 over 8y, 2.7% of budgetCONSERVATION RESOURCE ALLIANCE — $30,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetBLUM'S LANDING INC — $25,000 over 8y, 21% of budgetTHE BOTTOMLESS TOY CHEST INC — $22,500 over 9y, 0.9% of budgetTIP OF THE MITT WATERSHED COUNCIL — $15,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetRACQUET UP DETROIT — $14,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetCHILDREN'S HEALING CENTER — $12,500 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetICEBREAKER MACKINAW MARITIME MUSEUM — $10,000 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetOAKLAND LITERACY COUNCIL — $10,000 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC — $10,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPOWER BOOK BAGS — $9,200 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetHarbor Springs Library — $9,000 over 3y, 3.1% of budgetTHE PETOSKEY MONTESSORI CHILDREN'S HOUSE — $9,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetALPENA COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $8,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTHE NEHEMIAH PROJECT — $7,203 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetNORTH COUNTRY TRAIL ASSOCIATION INCORPORATED — $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetLITERATURE CIRCLE SOCIETY — $3,500 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetLIFE DIRECTIONS — $3,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetBARAGA BROADCASTING INC — $3,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetPAWS FOR LIFE RESCUE — $2,500 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetYOUNG LIFE — $1,650 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MCLAREN NORTHERN MICHIGAN FOUNDATION
  • Who funds HARBOR HALL FOUNDATION
  • Who funds Little Traverse Conservancy Inc
  • Who funds THE MANNA FOOD PROJECT INC DBA - THE MANNA FOOD PROJECT
  • Who funds ST MARY - ST PAUL MINISTRY
  • Who funds BARBARA ANN KARMANOS CANCER INSTITUTE
  • Who funds MUNSON HEALTHCARE FOUNDATIONS
  • Who funds INDUSTRIAL ARTS INSTITUTE INC
  • Who funds NORTHERN MICHIGAN EQUINE THERAPY
  • Who funds MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF MICHIGAN
  • Who funds HARBOR SPRINGS COMMUNITY FOOD PANTRY
  • Who funds Raven Hill Discovery Center
  • Who funds CONSERVATION RESOURCE ALLIANCE
  • Who funds BLUM'S LANDING INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Petoskey-Harbor Springs Area Community FoundationMI42.6× affinity18 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Petoskey-Harbor Springs Area Community Foundation · Frey Foundation · Triford Foundation · Charlevoix County Community Foundation · Henry E & Consuelo S Wenger Foundation Inc · The Offield Family Foundation · Oleson Foundation · Community Foundation for Southeast Michigan · Farmer Family Foundation · Consumers Energy Foundation · Tom and Ellen Noneman Foundation Co Plante Moran Trust · The Kent Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Baiardi Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 127 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph