Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Affordable Housing Management Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$28k
Granted FY2025still arriving
19
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$6k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Housing & Shelter$297kAnimals$23kArts & Culture$14kYouth Development$14kHuman Services$14kEnvironment$9kEducation$6kPublic Safety & Disaster$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$500
Median grant
7
States reached
$650k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GREAT LAKES CHAMBER ORCHESTRA$6,060
DETROIT HORSE POWER$5,000
PILOTS TO THE RESCUE$5,000
WOMEN'S RESOURCE CENTER OF NORTHERN MICHIGAN$5,000
SALVATION ARMY$1,500
LITTLE TRAVERSE CONSERVANCY$750
FRIENDS OF BOCA GRANDE$700
LITTLE TRAVERSE BAY HUMANE SOCIETY$600
TIP OF THE MITT WATERSHED COUNCIL$500
Individual grant recipient$500
WGCU$500
WCMU$500
HARBOR SPRINGS CHAMBER OF COMMERCE$500
A BETTER SHOT$250
EASTER SEALS$200
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $11k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%RISING HOPE EQUESTRIAN CENTER: $200 → 9%WOMEN'S RESOURCE CENTER OF NORTHERN MICHIGAN: $5k → 9%WOMEN'S RESOURCE CENTER OF NORTHERN MICHIGAN: $3k → 9%WOMEN'S RESOURCE CENTER OF NORTHERN MICHIGAN: $1k → 9%WOMEN'S RESOURCE CENTER OF NORTHERN MICHIGAN: $750 → 9%WOMEN'S RESOURCE CENTER OF NORTHERN MICHIGAN: $500 → 9%WOMEN'S RESOURCE CENTER OF NORTHERN MICHIGAN: $500 → 9%THE NEHEMIAH PROJECT: $100 → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MI
NY
OR
IA
NJ
CT
CA
CO
VA
AZ
DC
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

36%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$138k · 23 repeat orgs$248k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +56% since the first grant, against +40% for the ones you funded once.

23 repeat relationships — 16 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
28

Total granted

$138k
$242k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+56%
+40%

Still filing today

52%
54%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 76% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesAnimalsEnvironmentEducationHealthCommunity ImprovementOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WR
    Womens Resource Center of Northern Michigan Inc
    6× · 2020–2025 · $10k · revenue +56%
  • GL
    GREAT LAKES CHAMBER ORCHESTRA
    6× · 2020–2025 · $9k · revenue +127%
  • CH
    COLORADO HORSE RESCUE
    2× · 2020–2021 · $8k · revenue +68%

Funded once

  • NM
    NORTHWEST MI HABITAT FOR HUMANITYgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $225k · revenue +533%
  • CC
    CONNECTICUT COLLEGE
    one grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue +5%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $3k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Huron Pines Resource Conservation & Development Council Inc

It is our mission at huron pines to conserve and enhance northern michigan's natural resources to ensure healthy water, protected places and vibrant communities. for alomst 50 years, our work across the forests, lakes and streams of…

Environment
2
Coalition to Protect Michigan Resources

The coalition to protect michigan resources's mission is to be a strong voice for the equitable co-management of michigan's fisheries, with both the great lakes and inland lakes and streams, to insure that conservation principles remain in…

Environment
3
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
4
Ocean Conservancy

Ocean conservancy unites science, people, and policy to protect our ocean, today and for generations to come.

Environment
5
Rainforest Trust

Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.

International
6
Property and Environment Research Center

Perc is dedicated to advancing conservation through markets, incentives, property rights, and partnerships.

Public Benefit
7
Natural Resources Defense Council Inc

We safeguard the earth: its people, its plants and animals, and (see schedule o) the natural systems on which all life depends. we work to restore the integrity of the elements that sustain life - air, land, and water - to defend…

Environment
8
Denver Zoological Foundation

Inspiring communities to save wildlife for future generations.

Animals
9
American Humane Association

Founded in 1877, american humane association, dba american humane society (american humane) is committed to ensuring the safety, welfare and well-being of animals. our leadership programs are first to serve in promoting and nurturing the…

Animals
10
New Jersey Conservation Foundation

Recognizing that a healthy environment is critical to the well-being and survival of all living things, new jersey conservation foundation is devoted to preserving land and protecting natural resources throughout new jersey's (continued on…

Environment
11
Northern Jaguar Project

The mission of the northern jaguar project is to preserve and recover the world's northermost population of the jaguar, its unique natural habitat, and native wildlife under its protection as a flagship, keystone, and umbrella species.

Animals
12
Archbold Expeditions Inc

Archbold expeditions, inc.'s mission is to build and share the scientific knowledge needed to protect the life, lands, and waters of the heart of florida and beyond.

Unclassified

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Environmental Defense Fund Incorporated and the most unlike its peers is National Geographic Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyAnimal Rescue and AdoptionClassical Music EnsemblesDomestic Violence Crisis Se…Land Conservation Organizat…Environmental Advocacy Orga…Hospice Care ServicesCommunity Health CentersCommunity FoundationsFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Affordable Housing Developm…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 43 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number20%9%<5yr13%3%5–10yr20%12%10–20yr15%18%20–35yr14%27%35–55yr18%32%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value20%0%<5yr13%0%5–10yr20%6%10–20yr15%4%20–35yr14%85%35–55yr18%4%55yr+

The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 9% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/35
the rest of the field
12%
6,511/53,821

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

30 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 30 of the 55 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
30/30
Grantees still filing
23/30
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

NORTHWEST MI HABITAT FOR HUMANITY — $225,000 · OtherNORTHWEST MI HABITAT FOR HUMANITYNW HABITAT FOR HUMANITY — $68,550 · OtherNW HABITAT FOR HUMANITY+36 more — $31,865 · Other+36 moreCOLORADO HORSE RESCUE — $7,750 · AnimalsPILOTS TO THE RESCUE INC — $5,000 · AnimalsLITTLE TRAVERSE BAY HUMANE SOCIETY — $3,853 · Animals+1 more — $25 · AnimalsDETROIT HORSE POWER — $13,000 · Youth DevelopmentWomens Resource Center of Northern Michigan Inc — $10,250 · Human ServicesAARP FOUNDATION — $450 · Human Services+2 more — $300 · Human ServicesGREAT LAKES CHAMBER ORCHESTRA — $9,300 · Arts & CultureLittle Traverse Conservancy Inc — $3,100 · EnvironmentTIP OF THE MITT WATERSHED COUNCIL — $2,650 · EnvironmentWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC — $600 · Environment+1 more — $200 · EnvironmentCONNECTICUT COLLEGE — $5,000 · EducationWESTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $750 · Education+1 more — $25 · Education
Other$325,415Animals$16,628Youth Development$13,000Human Services$11,000Arts & Culture$9,300Environment$6,550Education$5,775

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetNORTHWEST MI HABITAT FOR HUMANITY — $225,000 over 1y, 23% of budgetDETROIT HORSE POWER — $13,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetWomens Resource Center of Northern Michigan Inc — $10,250 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetGREAT LAKES CHAMBER ORCHESTRA — $9,300 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetCOLORADO HORSE RESCUE — $7,750 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetCONNECTICUT COLLEGE — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLITTLE TRAVERSE BAY HUMANE SOCIETY — $3,853 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetLittle Traverse Conservancy Inc — $3,100 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTIP OF THE MITT WATERSHED COUNCIL — $2,650 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetHARBOR SPRINGS CHAMBER OF COMMERCE — $1,100 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetPETOSKEY-HARBOR SPRINGS AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWESTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC — $600 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMCLAREN NORTHERN MICHIGAN FOUNDATION — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHARBOR HALL FOUNDATION — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMOTE MARINE LABORATORY INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAARP FOUNDATION — $450 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetA BETTER SHOT FOUNDATION INC — $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSIERRA CLUB — $240 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRISING HOPE EQUESTRIAN CENTER — $200 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED — $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBOCA GRANDE HEALTH CLINIC INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NEHEMIAH PROJECT — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMPASSION & CHOICES — $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC SOCIETY — $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION — $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYOSEMITE FOUNDATION — $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NORTHWEST MI HABITAT FOR HUMANITY
  • Who funds DETROIT HORSE POWER
  • Who funds Womens Resource Center of Northern Michigan Inc
  • Who funds GREAT LAKES CHAMBER ORCHESTRA
  • Who funds COLORADO HORSE RESCUE
  • Who funds CONNECTICUT COLLEGE
  • Who funds PILOTS TO THE RESCUE INC
  • Who funds LITTLE TRAVERSE BAY HUMANE SOCIETY
  • Who funds Little Traverse Conservancy Inc
  • Who funds TIP OF THE MITT WATERSHED COUNCIL
  • Who funds HARBOR SPRINGS CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
  • Who funds PETOSKEY-HARBOR SPRINGS AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds WESTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC
  • Who funds MCLAREN NORTHERN MICHIGAN FOUNDATION
  • Who funds Save The Children Federation Inc
  • Who funds HARBOR HALL FOUNDATION
  • Who funds MOTE MARINE LABORATORY INC
  • Who funds AARP FOUNDATION
  • Who funds A BETTER SHOT FOUNDATION INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Triford FoundationMI20× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Triford Foundation · The Offield Family Foundation · Petoskey-Harbor Springs Area Community Foundation · Oleson Foundation · Frey Foundation · Community Foundation for Southeast Michigan · Mps Foundation · Charlevoix County Community Foundation · Gaf Foundation · Collier Community Foundation Inc · Consumers Energy Foundation · Charles Stewart Mott Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Affordable Housing Management Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%2%6%14%25%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 4%
  • Save the Children Federation Inc30% of income from government
  • Mote Marine Laboratory Inc4% of income from government
  • Connecticut College0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 55 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph