· Private foundation
Henry E & Consuelo S Wenger Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k38 grants · $141k
- $10k–50k26 grants · $419k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $420k
- $250k+1 grant · $300k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| THE STRYKE FDN FOR RARE DISEASE | $300,000 |
| LITTLE TRAVERSE CONSERVANCY | $240,000 |
| THAYER SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING AT DARTMOUT | $100,000 |
| EPIPHANY SCHOOL | $80,000 |
| BROWN UNIVERSITY | $30,000 |
| SEATTLE CHILDRENS HOSPITAL FOUNDATION | $28,000 |
| EVERGLADE FOUNDATION | $25,000 |
| LOGGERHEAD MARINE LIFE CENTER | $25,000 |
| BURT LAKE BAND OTTAWA-CHIPPEWA | $24,000 |
| WOMENS RESOURCE CENTER OF NORTHERN MICHIGAN | $22,800 |
| NW CHILDRENS FOUNDATION | $20,000 |
| RIVERSIDE THEATRE | $20,000 |
| 564 PARK AVENUE PRESERVATIN FOUNDATION | $20,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $17,000 |
| MCLAREN NORTHERN MICHIGAN FDN | $15,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY22–25, $84k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +36% since the first grant, against +30% for the ones you funded once.
83 repeat relationships — 56 still active in FY2025, 27 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $88k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- LTLittle Traverse Conservancy Inc7× · 2019–2025 · $922k · revenue +60%
- ESEPIPHANY SCHOOL6× · 2020–2025 · $255k · revenue +64%
- LMLOGGERHEAD MARINELIFE CENTER INC7× · 2019–2025 · $220k · revenue +3%
Funded once
- 1M100 MILLION WAYS FOUNDATIONone grant, 2023 · $250k
- MDMI DEPT OF NATURAL RESOURCESone grant, 2019 · $130k
- MCMOFFITT CENTER CANCER FOUNDATIONone grant, 2021 · $75k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.
Dartmouth College educates the most promising students and prepares them for a lifetime of learning and of responsible leadership, through a faculty dedicated to teaching and the creation of knowledge.
The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.
Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…
The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…
Bates is a college of the liberal arts and sciences, and is a coeducational, nonsectarian, residential college with special commitments to academic rigor, and to assuring in all of its efforts the dignity of each individual, and access to…
Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.
To preserve the unique character and natural resources of harvard.
To inform and enrich the intellectual lives of 20,000 alumni of harvard university in the washington, dc area and to assist harvard university with respect to applicants and undergraduates from the dc area.
The Marine Biological Laboratory (MBL) is a world-renowned center for biological discovery and training that is notably affiliated with more than 60 Nobel Prize winners. Research is conducted by full-time faculty as well as hundreds of the…
The mission of rhode island school of design, through its college and museum,is to educate its students and the public in the creation and (see schedule o)appreciation of works of art and design, to discover and transmit knowledge and to…
Williams College strives to achieve educational excellence by fostering a community of learning in collaboration with students, faculty, staff, devoted alumni and parents.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ronald Mcdonald House At the Maria Fareri Children's Hospital Inc and the most unlike its peers is Bissell Pet Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 44 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
96 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 96 of the 168 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Little Traverse Conservancy Inc ↗
- Who funds EPIPHANY SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds LOGGERHEAD MARINELIFE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds BROWN UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds THE HOTCHKISS SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds HARBOR SPRINGS AREA HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds THE EVERGLADES FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds The George Washington University ↗
- Who funds The Society of the Four Arts Inc ↗
- Who funds THE MONTANA LAND RELIANCE ↗
- Who funds President and Fellows of Harvard College ↗
- Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds Jupiter Medical Center Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds MCLAREN NORTHERN MICHIGAN FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Seattle Children's Foundation ↗
- Who funds TRUSTEES OF DEERFIELD ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds Lost Tree Village Charitable Foundation ↗
- Who funds Womens Resource Center of Northern Michigan Inc ↗
- Who funds CONSERVATION RESOURCE ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds THE BUSCH WILDLIFE SANCTUARY INC ↗
- Who funds THE AMERICAN FUND FOR LSE ↗
- Who funds 564 PARK AVENUE PRESERVATION FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CRANBROOK EDUCATIONAL COMMUNITY ↗
- Who funds INDIAN RIVER LAND TRUST INC ↗
- Who funds NW Childrens Foundation ↗
- Who funds MCKEE BOTANICAL GARDEN INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Petoskey-Harbor Springs Area Community Foundation · Frey Foundation · The Offield Family Foundation · Community Foundation for Southeast Michigan · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · Baiardi Family Foundation Inc · Triford Foundation · The Lilly Christy Busch Hermann Foundation · Farmer Family Foundation · Charles Stewart Mott Foundation · The Bessemer Giving Fund · Community Foundation of Jackson Hole
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Henry E & Consuelo S Wenger Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- President and Fellows of Harvard College — 7% of income from government
- The Banner Lake Club Inc — 1% of income from government
- Sandy Hook Promise Foundation — 0% of income from government
- Indian River Land Trust Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Henry E & Consuelo S Wenger Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Henry E & Consuelo S Wenger Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.