Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Odell Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$133k
Granted FY2025still arriving
24
Grants FY2025still arriving
12
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Religion$511kInternational$87kCivil Rights$78kEducation$56kHuman Services$55kCrime & Legal$45kPublic Benefit$40kHealth$29kOther$0
02FY2025 · 24 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k23 grants · $113k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $20k
$5,000
Median grant
12
States reached
$37k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Westgate Chapel$20,000
Women's Rights Without Frontiers$5,000
MITE$5,000
Independent Medical Alliance$5,000
American Center for Law & Justice$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
Cascade Womens Health$5,000
Alliance Defending Freedom$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
HaYovel$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
Thomas Moore Society$5,000
Maoz Israel Ministries$5,000
Students for Life$5,000
Prison Impact Ministries$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $55k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 17% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Family Research Council: $5k → 14%Antioch Adoption: $15k → 9%Family Research Council: $3k → 14%Antioch Adoption: $10k → 9%Family Research Council: $2k → 14%Antioch Adoption: $8k → 9%Antioch Adoption: $5k → 9%Antioch Adoption: $5k → 9%Antioch Adoption: $3k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MT
IL
WY
OH
CA
CO
MO
VA
MD
AZ
NC
DC
OK
MS
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$835k · 26 repeat orgs$63k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +45% since the first grant, against +34% for those funded once.

26 repeat relationships: 20 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

26
9

Total granted

$835k
$45k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+45%
+34%

Still filing today

58%
22%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $18k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Civil RightsInternationalReligionHealthHuman ServicesCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TL
    The Legacy Institute
    2× · 2022–2023 · $56k · revenue +121%
  • WR
    WOMEN'S RIGHTS WITHOUT FRONTIERS INTERNATIONAL
    6× · 2020–2025 · $52k · revenue +5%
  • AA
    ANTIOCH ADOPTIONS
    6× · 2020–2025 · $45k · revenue +45%

Funded once

  • LC
    LIBERTY COUNSEL INC
    one grant, 2024 · $10k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $10k
  • PR
    PREGANCY RESOURCE CENTER SNOHOMISH
    one grant, 2021 · $8k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Fsi-Freedom Seekers International

Freedom seekers international is a christian organization that exists to rescue the most severely persecuted for their religious faith in hostile and restrictive countries. through collaborative partnerships we deliver those who are…

Human Services
2
Christian Apologetics and Research Ministry Inc

To glorify god by equipping the church with proper christian doctrine and to help non-believers come to a saving knowledge of jesus christ.

—
3
Bible Thinker Inc

Bible Thinker, Inc is a ministry dedicated to equipping people to think and live biblically. There are three main areas of teaching that we focus on:1. Teaching accurate theology based on exegeting the text of the Bible and confronting…

Religion
4
International Catholic Jurists Forum Inc

The International Catholic Jurists Forum (ICJF) was established to produce, compile, and share resources on fundamental human rights under attack in the regional and international human rights protection systems. It operates as a forum for…

Religion
5
Liberty Initiative

Biblical worldview advancement

Religion
6
Women Intercessors for the Church and Nations

To reach the world with the Gospel of the Lord Jesus Christ through Prayer and Intercession, Evangelism, Seminars, Mercy Missions, Leadership Training, Publications and Conferences and Outreaches.

Religion
7
Jubal Band Ministries

Jubal band ministries mission is to invite people to become disciples of christian life with jesus.

Religion
8
Intimate Life Ministries
—
9
Allyfe Pregnancy Clinics

Allyfe pregnancy clinic exists to offer truth, hope, and love to every woman and family facing an unexpected pregnancy. founded in 1985, we have built four decades of integrity as a christ-centered center of excellence - providing…

Human Services
10
Intentional Life Media

Dedicated to igniting personal transformation by affirming faith, inspiring hope, and equipping individuals, to live an intentional life in christ.

Religion
11
Faithful America

The largest online community of christians putting faith into action for social justice. continued on schedule o

Civil Rights
12
Behold Israel

To provide accurate reporting on israel and current events based on god's written word and most importantly lead people to the saving knowledge of jesus christ.

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Students for Life of America Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Legacy Institute. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 40 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/22
Grantees still filing
18/22
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WESTGATE CHAPEL: $279,820 · OtherWESTGATE CHAPELSONRISE CHAPEL: $92,400 · OtherSONRISE CHAPELAmerican Center for Law & Justice: $35,000 · OtherAmerican Center for Law & JusticeIndividual grant recipient: $28,000 · Other+17 more: $112,200 · Other+17 moreFamily Policy Institute of Washington: $34,500 · Civil RightsFamily Pol…ALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM: $17,000 · Civil RightsALLIANCE D…FIRST LIBERTY INSTITUTE: $14,000 · Civil RightsFIRST LIBE…LIVE ACTION: $12,000 · Civil RightsLIVE ACTIO…Students for Life of America Inc: $7,000 · Civil RightsStudents f…WOMEN'S RIGHTS WITHOUT FRONTIERS INTERNATIONAL: $52,000 · InternationalWOMEN'S R…CHRISTIAN SOLIDARITY WORLDWIDE-USA: $20,000 · InternationalCHRISTIAN…HAYOVEL INC: $6,000 · InternationalHAYOVEL I…The Legacy Institute: $55,500 · Education+1 more: $100 · EducationANTIOCH ADOPTIONS: $45,000 · Human ServicesFAMILY RESEARCH COUNCIL: $9,500 · Human ServicesPRISON IMPACT MINISTRIES: $24,500 · Crime & LegalTHOMAS MORE SOCIETY: $12,500 · Crime & LegalCASCADE WOMEN'S HEALTH: $16,000 · HealthINDEPENDENT MEDICAL ALLIANCE: $5,000 · HealthAMERICAN FAMILY ASSOCIATION INC: $13,000 · ReligionSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $6,000 · ReligionTRUTH FOR LIFE: $1,000 · Religion
Other$547,420Civil Rights$84,500International$78,000Education$55,600Human Services$54,500Crime & Legal$37,000Health$21,000Religion$20,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetThe Legacy Institute: $55,500 over 2y, 20% of budgetWOMEN'S RIGHTS WITHOUT FRONTIERS INTERNATIONAL: $52,000 over 6y, 3.9% of budgetANTIOCH ADOPTIONS: $45,000 over 6y, 2.3% of budgetFamily Policy Institute of Washington: $34,500 over 5y, 2.1% of budgetPRISON IMPACT MINISTRIES: $24,500 over 6y, 2.7% of budgetCHRISTIAN SOLIDARITY WORLDWIDE-USA: $20,000 over 4y, 5.3% of budgetALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM: $17,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCASCADE WOMEN'S HEALTH: $16,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetFIRST LIBERTY INSTITUTE: $14,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FAMILY ASSOCIATION INC: $13,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHOMAS MORE SOCIETY: $12,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetLIVE ACTION: $12,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMAOZ INC: $11,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetFAMILY RESEARCH COUNCIL: $9,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetStudents for Life of America Inc: $7,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHAYOVEL INC: $6,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTURNING POINT USA INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHe Intends Victory: $2,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTRUTH FOR LIFE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Moody Bible Institute of Chicago: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds The Legacy Institute ↗
  • Who funds WOMEN'S RIGHTS WITHOUT FRONTIERS INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds ANTIOCH ADOPTIONS ↗
  • Who funds Family Policy Institute of Washington ↗
  • Who funds PRISON IMPACT MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds CHRISTIAN SOLIDARITY WORLDWIDE-USA ↗
  • Who funds ALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM ↗
  • Who funds CASCADE WOMEN'S HEALTH ↗
  • Who funds FIRST LIBERTY INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FAMILY ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THOMAS MORE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds LIVE ACTION ↗
  • Who funds MAOZ INC ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY RESEARCH COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds Students for Life of America Inc ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
  • Who funds HAYOVEL INC ↗
  • Who funds INDEPENDENT MEDICAL ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds TURNING POINT USA INC ↗
  • Who funds He Intends Victory ↗
  • Who funds TRUTH FOR LIFE ↗
  • Who funds The Moody Bible Institute of Chicago ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Servant FoundationKS17.3× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Servant Foundation · The Signatry Charitable Trust · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Christian Community Foundation Inc · Puget Sound Energy Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Odell Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Odell Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 40 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Odell’s filings →

    More from the funding graph