· Private foundation
The Newell Brands Charitable Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k9 grants · $51k
- $10k–50k10 grants · $125k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| NORTHWEST ARKANSAS CHILDREN'S SHELTER | $15,000 |
| ATLANTA COMMUNITY FOOD BANK | $15,000 |
| CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER | $15,000 |
| ANGELS AND SPARROWS SOUP KITCHEN INC | $15,000 |
| CHILDREN'S HEALTHCARE OF ATLANTA | $15,000 |
| LIFELINE ANIMAL PROJECT | $10,000 |
| KIDS OF THE COMMUNITY | $10,000 |
| KANSAS FOOD BANK WAREHOUSE | $10,000 |
| EMPTY STOCKING FUND | $10,000 |
| FIRST DAY SHOE FUND | $10,000 |
| ATLANTA UNION MISSION CORPORATION | $7,500 |
| SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF EAST TENNESSEE | $7,500 |
| FOOD BANK OF WESTERN MASSACHUSETTS | $7,500 |
| SUNLIGHT CHILDRENS SERVICES | $6,000 |
| SAVE THE CHILDREN FEDERATION | $5,489 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $243k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 55% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +5% since the first grant, against -9% for the ones you funded once.
26 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2024, 15 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 57% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $75k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- ANAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches4× · 2018–2024 · $138k · revenue +9%
- ASANGELS & SPARROWS SOUP KITCHEN INC5× · 2020–2024 · $58k · revenue +59%
SHARE OUR STRENGTH3× · 2022–2024 · $55k · revenue +5%
Funded once
- NBNEWELL BRANDS COMMUNITY FUND INCone grant, 2020 · $270k · 73% of their budget
- JAJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF GEORGIA DISCOVERY CENTER INCone grant, 2018 · $50k · revenue -4%
- RWROBERT W WOODRUFF ARTS CENTER INCgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $25k · revenue +62%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The food bank for central & northeast missouri is a regional disaster and hunger relief network that acquires and distributes millions of meals each year to help neighbors get the food they need to thrive. (continued on schedule o)the…
Children's services
Nourishing hope provides food, mental health support, and social services to help all our neighbors thrive.
Nourish people. build solutions. empower communities. no one goes hungry.
Our mission is to solve hunger in central pennsylvania by ensuring that everyone struggling with hunger has access to enough wholesome food every day. we will achieve this bold goal with the help of our generous donors, volunteers and…
Empowering south carolina communities and children's advocacy centers to deliver a best practice response to child abuse
Family & children services strengthens the safety and well being of children, individuals and families; accomplished by providing a comprehensive program of critical human services.
Feeding the spiritual and physical hunger, especially in at-risk children.
The greater chicago food depository is the nonprofit food bank serving cook county. our mission - is to end hunger. we believe food is a basic human right. to achieve our mission, we work in partnership with a network of community-based…
United Food Bank unites communities to alleviate hunger.
To strengthen families, organizations, and communities to prevent child abuse and neglect.
To advance change by feeding the hungry and educating and engaging the community in the fight to end hunger.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Atlanta Union Mission Corporation and the most unlike its peers is Health Research Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 36 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
66 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 66 of the 100 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds KABOOM INC ↗
- Who funds NEWELL BRANDS COMMUNITY FUND INC ↗
- Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
- Who funds Save The Children Federation Inc ↗
- Who funds ANGELS & SPARROWS SOUP KITCHEN INC ↗
- Who funds SHARE OUR STRENGTH ↗
- Who funds NORTHWEST ARKANSAS CHILDREN'S SHELTER IN DBA EVERHOPE ARKANSAS INC ↗
- Who funds JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF GEORGIA DISCOVERY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds ATLANTA COMMUNITY FOOD BANK INC ↗
- Who funds THE FOOD BANK OF WESTERN MASSACHUSETTS INC ↗
- Who funds TEACHING FOR CHANGE ↗
- Who funds Empty Stocking Fund Inc ↗
- Who funds CATALYST INC ↗
- Who funds ROBERT W WOODRUFF ARTS CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds KANSAS FOODBANK WAREHOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF SOUTH CENTRAL KANSAS INC ↗
- Who funds SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF EAST TENNESSEE ↗
- Who funds DOMUS KIDS INC ↗
- Who funds FILL A HEART 4 KIDS ↗
- Who funds BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF FRANKLIN COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S HEALTHCARE OF ATLANTA INC ↗
- Who funds CRISIS TEXT LINE INC ↗
- Who funds HELPING ADVANCE AND NURTURE THE DEVELOPMENT OF YOUTH INC (HANDY INC) ↗
- Who funds HEALTH RESEARCH INC ↗
- Who funds CHICAGO COLLEGIATE INC ↗
- Who funds SUNLIGHT CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY CENTER OF NORTHERN WESTCHESTER INC ↗
- Who funds NORTHERN ILLINOIS FOOD BANK ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Synchrony Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America · Duke Energy Foundation · The Imlay Foundation Inc · Publix Super Markets Charities Inc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · THDF II Inc DBA The Home Depot Foundation & Homer Fund · United Way Worldwide · American Express Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · The Gap Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Newell Brands Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Save the Children Federation Inc — 30% of income from government
- Helping Advance and Nurture the Development of Youth Inc (Handy Inc) — 21% of income from government
- Domus Kids Inc — 7% of income from government
- The Clarke School for the Deaf Clarke Schools for Hearing and Speech — 1% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Newell Brands Charitable Foundation?
Find your warmest path to The Newell Brands Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.