Skip to content
The Narbha Institute Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

The Narbha Institute Inc

Serve medicaid managed care subcontract, supported housing for mentally ill, convener/supporter in health/social determinants.

$7.1M
Granted FY2025still arriving
55
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$866k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$22MEducation$4.2MHuman Services$1.6MPublic Benefit$955kCommunity Improvement$836kHousing & Shelter$530kFood & Nutrition$282kPhilanthropy$249kOther$0
02FY2025 · 55 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 55 grants below total $6,582,685, the rows itemized in this filing. The $7,121,281 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $538,596 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $41k
  • $10k–50k22 grants · $488k
  • $50k–250k21 grants · $2.6M
  • $250k+6 grants · $3.5M
$49,982
Median grant
5
States reached
$73M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE GUIDANCE CENTER INC$865,790
MOHAVE MENTAL HEALTH CLINIC INC$786,753
COMMUNITY BRIDGES INC$595,465
SOUTHWEST BEHAVIORAL HEALTH SERVICES INC$561,885
CHANGEPOINT INTEGRATED HEALTH$392,794
WEST YAVAPAI GUIDANCE CLINIC DBA POLARA$272,458
SPECTRUM HEALTHCARE GROUP INC$202,986
TERROS INC$201,154
NORTHERN ARIZONA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$200,000
HORIZON HEALTH & WELLNESS INC$173,338
JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICE INC$170,605
THE GUIDANCE CENTER$168,305
EMPACT-SUICIDE PREVENTION CENTER$156,739
ASU FOUNDATION FOR A NEW AMERICAN UNIVERSITY$128,500
CHILD & FAMILY SUPPORT SERVICES$127,142
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $4.5M) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%CHANGEPOINT INTEGRATED HEALTH: $1.1M → 26%CHANGEPOINT INTEGRATED HEALTH: $650k → 26%CHANGEPOINT INTEGRATED HEALTH: $393k → 26%Matforce (JV): $32k → 14%CHANGEPOINT INTEGRATED HEALTH INC (N 85000 AND JV 534): $86k → 26%Changepoint Integrated Health Inc (JV): $72k → 26%Catholic Charities Community Services Inc (JV): $50k → 11%OLD CONCHO COMMUNITY ASSISTANCE CENTER: $60k → 28%OLD CONCHO COMMUNITY ASSISTANCE CENTER: $60k → 28%CIRCLE THE CITY: $25k → 11%OLD CONCHO COMMUNITY ASSISTANCE CTR: $60k → 28%OLD CONCHO COMMUNITY ASSISTANCE CENTER INC: $40k → 28%OLD CONCHO COMMUNITY ASSISTANCE CENTER INC (JV): $30k → 28%CATHOLIC CHARITIES COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $10k → 11%OLD CONCHO COMMUNITY ASSISTANCE CENTER INC: $30k → 28%OLD CONCHO COMMUNITY ASSISTANCE CENTER: $30k → 28%hope lives - vive le esperanza (JV): $18k → 11%STEPS TO RECOVERY HOMES: $53k → 14%STEPS TO RECOVERY HOMES: $27k → 14%STEPS TO RECOVERY HOMES: $25k → 14%HOPE LIVES VIVE LA ESPERANZA: $110k → 11%STEPS TO RECOVERY HOMES: $10k → 14%HOPE LIVES VIVE LA ESPERANZA: $64k → 11%HOPE LIVES VIVE LA ESPERANZA: $61k → 11%HOPE LIVES VIVE LA ESPERANZA: $57k → 11%CORNUCOPIA COMMUNITY ADVOCATES (N): $24k → 14%HOPE LIVES-VIVE LA EXPERANZA: $50k → 11%HOPE LIVES - VIVE LA ESPERANZA: $24k → 11%HOPE LIVES - VIVE LA ESPERANZA: $22k → 11%HOPE LIVES-VIVE LA EXPERANZA: $11k → 11%HELPING FAMILIES IN NEED: $50k → 11%HELPING FAMILIES IN NEED (JV): $20k → 11%HELPING FAMILIES IN NEED: $20k → 11%HELPING FAMILIES IN NEED: $20k → 11%HELPING FAMILIES IN NEED: $10k → 11%HUSHABYE NURSERY: $200k → 11%COCONINO COALITION FOR CHILDREN AND YOUTH: $27k → 16%HUSHABYE NURSERY: $193k → 11%HUSHABYE NURSERY: $100k → 11%HUSHABYE NURSERY: $100k → 11%HUSHABYE NURSERY: $100k → 11%HUSHABYE NURSERY: $25k → 11%Victim Witness Services for Coconino County (JV): $25k → 16%COCONINO COALITION FOR CHILDREN & YOUTH: $10k → 16%JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICE INC: $171k → 11%family involvement center (JV): $37k → 11%FAMILY INVOLVEMENT CENTER INC: $24k → 11%FAMILY INVOLVEMENT CENTER INC: $17k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
MT
NY
MA
PA
CA
AZ
NM
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$36M · 68 repeat orgs$2.0M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +20% since the first grant, against +10% for those funded once.

68 repeat relationships: 36 still active in FY2025, 32 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

68
42

Total granted

$36M
$1.1M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+20%
+10%

Still filing today

79%
74%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $920k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesEducationCommunity ImprovementArts & CultureHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NC
    NORTH COUNTRY HEALTHCARE INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $3.4M · revenue +21%
  • SB
    SOUTHWEST BEHAVIORAL HEALTH SERVICES INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $3.1M · revenue +22%
  • NA
    NORTHERN ARIZONA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $2.8M · revenue +337%

Funded once

  • BH
    Banner Health Foundationgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $100k · revenue +52%
  • SP
    Starfish Partnerships Corporation
    one grant, 2024 · $100k · 46% of their budget
  • SR
    Sunshine Rescue Mission
    one grant, 2024 · $100k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Arizona Hospital & Healthcare Association

Bringing together diverse voices to advance health and healthcare in arizona.

—
2
Arizona Latin-American Medical Association
Unclassified
3
Northern Arizona Healthcare Corporation

Improving health, healing people.

Health
4
Codac Health Recovery & Wellness

Codac provides tools, support and services to individuals, families, and communities so they may live with dignity, free from the harmful effects of mental illness, substance use disorders and trauma.

—
5
Arizona Healthiest State Foundation
—
6
Southeastern Arizona Behavioral Health Services Inc

Our mission is continually to improve the quality of life for the people we serve in collaboration with our diverse communities in a respectful, caring, culturally sensitive manner. The organization provides behavioral health services for…

Health
7
Arizona Wins

Az wins is a coalition of organizations dedicated to achieving public policies that benefit working arizona families and advancing an inclusive, engaged, just and equitable state for all arizonans. in 2024 az wins substantially reduced its…

Civil Rights
8
Marana Health Center Inc

Improving our community by providing exceptional, whole-person healthcare.

Health
9
Arizona Family Health Partnership

To make sexual and reproductive healthcare accessible to everyone

—
10
Southwest Colorado Mental Health Center Inc

To make a meaningful difference through healthcare innovation and caring for the whole person.

Health
11
Banner Health

Banner health's nonprofit mission is "making health care easier, so life can be better".

Health
12
Honorhealth

Honorhealth's mission is to improve the health and well-being of those we serve.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is First Place Az; the most unlike its peers is Sitgreaves Community Development Corporation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

100 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 100 of the 123 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
19
Early backer (in before they grew)
96/100
Grantees still filing
51/100
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Mohave Mental Health Clinic Inc: $4,872,658 · HealthMohave Mental Health Clinic IncSOUTHWEST BEHAVIORAL HEALTH SERVICES INC: $3,091,148 · HealthSOUTHWEST BEHAVIORAL HEALTH SERVICES INCTHE TRANSLATIONAL GENOMICS RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $2,670,000 · HealthTHE TRANSLATIONAL GENOMICS RESEARCH INSTITUTECOMMUNITY BRIDGES INC: $2,199,500 · HealthCOMMUNITY BRIDGES INCWEST YAVAPAI GUIDANCE CLINIC INC: $1,855,971 · HealthWEST YAVAPAI GUIDANCE CLINIC INC+22 more: $1,429,037 · Health+22 moreNORTH COUNTRY HEALTHCARE INC: $3,350,000 · OtherNORTH COUNTRY HEALTHCARE INCTHE GUIDANCE CENTER INC: $2,029,519 · OtherTHE GUIDANCE CENTER INCSPECTRUM HEALTHCARE GROUP INC: $1,447,230 · OtherSPECTRUM HEALTHCARE GROUP INCNORTHERN ARIZONA UNIVERSITY: $698,817 · OtherNORTHERN ARIZONA UNIVERSITY+53 more: $4,077,593 · Other+53 moreChangePoint Integrated Health: $2,348,486 · Human ServicesChangePoint I…HUSHABYE NURSERY: $717,944 · Human ServicesHUSHABYE NURS…Hope Lives Vive La Esperanza: $416,365 · Human ServicesHope Lives Vi…OLD CONCHO COMMUNITY ASSISTANCE CEN: $318,545 · Human ServicesOLD CONCHO CO…JEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICE INC: $170,605 · Human Services+14 more: $577,243 · Human Services+14 moreNORTHERN ARIZONA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $2,828,934 · EducationNORTHERN A…COCONINO COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $305,500 · EducationCOCONINO C…ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION FOR A NEW AMERICAN UNIVERSITY: $138,000 · Education+5 more: $101,500 · EducationLOCAL INITIATIVES SUPPORT CORPORATION: $600,000 · Community ImprovementCoconino County Sustainable Economic Development Initiative: $494,461 · Community ImprovementWESTCARE ARIZONA I INC: $59,000 · Community ImprovementCherish Families: $50,000 · Community Improvement+3 more: $35,800 · Community ImprovementUNITED WAY OF NORTHERN ARIZONA INC: $349,350 · PhilanthropyMARICOPA COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT FOUNDATION: $100,000 · PhilanthropyFIRST PLACE AZ: $250,000 · Housing & ShelterFLAGSTAFF SHELTER SERVICES INC: $88,000 · Housing & Shelter+1 more: $10,000 · Housing & Shelter
Health$16,118,314Other$11,603,159Human Services$4,549,188Education$3,373,934Community Improvement$1,239,261Philanthropy$449,350Housing & Shelter$348,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMohave Mental Health Clinic Inc: $4,872,658 over 5y, 11% of budgetNORTH COUNTRY HEALTHCARE INC: $3,350,000 over 5y, 1.5% of budgetSOUTHWEST BEHAVIORAL HEALTH SERVICES INC: $3,091,148 over 8y, 1.5% of budgetNORTHERN ARIZONA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $2,828,934 over 9y, 7.4% of budgetTHE TRANSLATIONAL GENOMICS RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $2,670,000 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetChangePoint Integrated Health: $2,348,486 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetCOMMUNITY BRIDGES INC: $2,199,500 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetTHE GUIDANCE CENTER INC: $2,029,519 over 9y, 4.9% of budgetWEST YAVAPAI GUIDANCE CLINIC INC: $1,855,971 over 9y, 2.1% of budgetSPECTRUM HEALTHCARE GROUP INC: $1,447,230 over 9y, 1.9% of budgetHUSHABYE NURSERY: $717,944 over 6y, 7.0% of budgetLOCAL INITIATIVES SUPPORT CORPORATION: $600,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCoconino County Sustainable Economic Development Initiative: $494,461 over 9y, 100% of budgetHope Lives Vive La Esperanza: $416,365 over 7y, 6.9% of budgetUNITED WAY OF NORTHERN ARIZONA INC: $349,350 over 6y, 4.9% of budgetOLD CONCHO COMMUNITY ASSISTANCE CEN: $318,545 over 8y, 6.6% of budgetCOCONINO COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $305,500 over 6y, 6.2% of budgetFLAGSTAFF FAMILY FOOD CENTER: $281,600 over 6y, 2.9% of budgetFIRST PLACE AZ: $250,000 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR HEALTHCARE IMPROVEMENT: $224,800 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetTERROS INC: $217,154 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetHEALTH CURRENT: $195,323 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetHORIZON HEALTH AND WELLNESS INC: $173,338 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICE INC: $170,605 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetFLAGSTAFF SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION: $157,050 over 4y, 11% of budgetEMPACT-SUICIDE PREVENTION CENTER: $156,739 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetNAMI ARIZONA: $141,082 over 7y, 21% of budgetCOMMUNITY AWARENESS RESOURCE ENTITY OF ARIZONA: $140,350 over 3y, 9.5% of budgetLITTLE COLORADO BEHAVIORAL HEALTH CENTERS INC: $140,070 over 8y, 0.8% of budgetARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION FOR A NEW AMERICAN UNIVERSITY: $138,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPS TO RECOVERY HOMES: $120,300 over 5y, 3.2% of budgetHELPING FAMILIES IN NEED: $120,000 over 5y, 3.8% of budgetTECHNICAL ASSISTANCE PARTNERSHIP OF ARIZONA: $110,000 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetMIKID-Mentally Ill Kids in Distress: $105,917 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetBanner Health Foundation: $100,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetStarfish Partnerships Corporation: $100,000 over 1y, 46% of budgetMARICOPA COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT FOUNDATION: $100,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetARIZONA THERAPEUTIC LEARNING CENTER: $100,000 over 3y, 11% of budgetSunshine Rescue Mission: $100,000 over 1y, 8.3% of budgetGRAND CANYON YOUTH INC: $95,756 over 3y, 3.0% of budgetFLAGSTAFF SHELTER SERVICES INC: $88,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetPREVENT CHILD ABUSE ARIZONA: $85,000 over 5y, 1.5% of budgetFAMILY INVOLVEMENT CENTER INC: $77,209 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetCENTER FOR THE RIGHTS OF ABUSED CHILDREN: $75,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetRECENTERS OF ARIZONA INC: $72,000 over 3y, 5.2% of budgetNORTHLAND FAMILY HELP CENTER: $61,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $60,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWESTCARE ARIZONA I INC: $59,000 over 1y, 3.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Mohave Mental Health Clinic Inc ↗
  • Who funds NORTH COUNTRY HEALTHCARE INC ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHWEST BEHAVIORAL HEALTH SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds NORTHERN ARIZONA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE TRANSLATIONAL GENOMICS RESEARCH INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds ChangePoint Integrated Health ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY BRIDGES INC ↗
  • Who funds THE GUIDANCE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds WEST YAVAPAI GUIDANCE CLINIC INC ↗
  • Who funds SPECTRUM HEALTHCARE GROUP INC ↗
  • Who funds HUSHABYE NURSERY ↗
  • Who funds LOCAL INITIATIVES SUPPORT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds Coconino County Sustainable Economic Development Initiative ↗
  • Who funds Hope Lives Vive La Esperanza ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF NORTHERN ARIZONA INC ↗
  • Who funds OLD CONCHO COMMUNITY ASSISTANCE CEN ↗
  • Who funds COCONINO COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FLAGSTAFF FAMILY FOOD CENTER ↗
  • Who funds FIRST PLACE AZ ↗
  • Who funds INSTITUTE FOR HEALTHCARE IMPROVEMENT ↗
  • Who funds TERROS INC ↗
  • Who funds HEALTH CURRENT ↗
  • Who funds HORIZON HEALTH AND WELLNESS INC ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICE INC ↗
  • Who funds FLAGSTAFF SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds EMPACT-SUICIDE PREVENTION CENTER ↗
  • Who funds NAMI ARIZONA ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY AWARENESS RESOURCE ENTITY OF ARIZONA ↗
  • Who funds LITTLE COLORADO BEHAVIORAL HEALTH CENTERS INC ↗
  • Who funds ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION FOR A NEW AMERICAN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds STEPS TO RECOVERY HOMES ↗
  • Who funds HELPING FAMILIES IN NEED ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Arizona Community Fou…Health First Foundati…Molly and Joseph Herm…Burton Family Foundat…The Foundation for Co…Virginia G Piper Char…Mercy CareThe Diane and Bruce H…United Way of Norther…Geile Charitable Foun…Delta Dental Plan of …St Mary's Food Bank A…
Arizona Community FoundationAZ85.8× affinity62 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Arizona Community Foundation · Health First Foundation-Northern Arizona · Molly and Joseph Herman Foundation · Burton Family Foundation · The Foundation for Community and Health Advancement · Virginia G Piper Charitable Trust · Mercy Care · The Diane and Bruce Halle Foundation · United Way of Northern Arizona Inc · Geile Charitable Foundation · Delta Dental Plan of Arizona Charitable Foundation and Trust · St Mary's Food Bank Alliance

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Narbha Institute Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Narbha Institute Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Institute for Healthcare Improvement: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
33report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Narbha Institute Inc?

Find your warmest path to The Narbha Institute Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 123 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Narbha Institute’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home