How much does The Naomi Prawer Kadar Foundation Inc give?

The Naomi Prawer Kadar Foundation Inc reported 9 grants totaling $1,393,514 in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 5 and 9 organizations a year over FY2018 to FY2024.

What does The Naomi Prawer Kadar Foundation Inc fund?

By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2025, its largest causes are Education (54%), International (30%), Health (7%).

Who are The Naomi Prawer Kadar Foundation Inc's largest grantees?

By total granted over FY2017 to FY2025: American Friends of Tel Aviv Univ ($3.0M), The American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc ($2.8M), Shefa School ($663k).

Does The Naomi Prawer Kadar Foundation Inc fund new organizations?

In FY2024, 29% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.

Does The Naomi Prawer Kadar Foundation Inc accept unsolicited applications?

Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

Which funders back the same organizations as The Naomi Prawer Kadar Foundation Inc?

Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Jewish Communal Fund, Combined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc, Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program.

Where is The Naomi Prawer Kadar Foundation Inc based?

The Naomi Prawer Kadar Foundation Inc is based in FL.

The Naomi Prawer Kadar Foundation Inc

The Naomi Prawer Kadar Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

The Naomi Prawer Kadar Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.4M

Granted FY2025still arriving

Grants FY2025still arriving

States reached

$663k

Largest

01What it funds

01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$5.1MInternational$2.8MHealth$650kArts & Culture$453kReligion$329kCivil Rights$100kFood & Nutrition$20kHuman Services$4k

02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

$10k–50k1 grant · $25k
$50k–250k7 grants · $706k
$250k+1 grant · $663k

$100,000

Median grant

States reached

$75k

Total assets

Largest grants
Recipient	Amount
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY INC	$662,514
THE SHEFA SCHOOL	$156,000
OTI	$125,000
FRIENDS OF SHEBA MEDICAL CENTER	$125,000
YANABIA	$100,000
GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY	$100,000
ISRAEL ON CAMPUS COALITION	$50,000
THE AMERICAN JEWISH JOINT DISTRIBUTION COMMITTEE	$50,000
COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY	$25,000

02The need

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–18, $80k) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

How this is measured

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

How this is measured

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.

03Its grantees

repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.

$8.5M · 14 repeat orgs$540k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +50% since the first grant, against +35% for those funded once.

14 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$8.5M

$415k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+50%

+35%

Still filing today

64%

57%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $125k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

EducationInternationalArts & CultureHuman ServicesReligionFood & NutritionOther

How this is measured

First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

AF
American Friends of Tel Aviv Univ
9× · 2017–2025 · $3.0M · revenue +50%
The American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc
9× · 2017–2025 · $2.8M · revenue +24%
SS
SHEFA SCHOOL
6× · 2020–2025 · $663k · revenue +135%

Funded once

RA
RISHON AGAM MUSEUM
one grant, 2018 · $200k
AF
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE RAMBAM MEDICAL CENTER
one grant, 2018 · $50k · revenue -9%
TC
TAL CENTER
2× · 2022–2023 · $50k

How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Bar Ilan University in Israel Inc

Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.

—

Weizmann Institute of Science

The weizmann institute of science, located in rehovot, israel, is one of the worlds top-ranking, multidisciplinary research institutions. at any one time, several thousand scientists, staff and students are involved in hundreds of research…

Science & Tech

The Israel Institute Inc

The israel institute, inc. (the institute) enhances knowledge about modern israel by ensuring that more students have access to courses about israel during their time on campus.

International

Hebrew University of Jerusalem

To promote, encourage, aid and advance higher and secondary education, research and training in all branches of knowledge. as the standard bearer of excellence, the university strives to ensure and foster outstanding achievements in all…

Education

Sherit Isroel

—

American Friends of Bar-Ilan University

We fundraise in the u.s. to support, and raise awareness of, bar-ilan university in israel.

Education

American Friends of Hebrew University Inc

Support the hebrew univ. of jerusalem, israel's foremost center of higher edu. & research.

International

Hebrew College

Promotes excellence in jewish learning & leadership within a pluralistic environment. see sch ohebrew college promotes excellence in jewish learning and leadership within a pluralistic environment of open inquiry, intellectual rigor,…

Education

Yeshiva University

The university is composed of several colleges and schools providing undergraduate, graduate, professional and post-doctoral education and training and research and clinical programs.

Education

American Society for Technion Israel Institute of Technology Inc

The american technion society supports the technion's critical research and (continued on sch o)

International

Zichron Avrohom Yosef

Philanthropy

University of Judaism Foundation

—

How this is measured

The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Israel On Campus Coalition Inc; the most unlike its peers is Life's Door Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

19/19

Grantees still filing

14/19

Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

International$5,897,863Education$1,862,498Other$1,507,836Arts & Culture$95,050Human Services$80,000Philanthropy$36,000Religion$25,000Food & Nutrition$20,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundNY15.5× affinity6 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · Combined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Naomi Prawer Kadar Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Naomi Prawer Kadar Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%

typical government reliance, FY20–25

How this is measured

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

Play a game based on Naomi Prawer Kadar’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions

grants reported with no recipient in the public record

The regranting layer

51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer

The DAF merry-go-round

$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds

The endowment market

who holds foundation money, and what just moved

The camps

funders cluster by geography, not ideology

By state

where grant money is based, and what stays home