Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Harris J and Geraldine S Nelson Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$72k
Granted FY2025still arriving
18
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$27k
Largest
01What you fund
0196% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20182025.

Arts & Culture$111kEducation$107kInternational$92kRecreation & Sports$46kHealth$32kHuman Services$17kAnimals$10kPhilanthropy$7kOther$0
02FY2025 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k16 grants · $32k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $40k
$3,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$694k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNSCA FOUNDATION$27,000
THE CULTURAL LANDSCAPE FOUNDATION$12,550
WILDLIFE CONSERVATION NETWORK$4,000
KERES CHILDRENS LEARNING CENTER$4,000
SUNRISE CLINICS$3,500
PARTNERSHIP FOR PROVIDENCE PARKS$3,000
AMIGOS BRAVOS INC$3,000
CANCER FOUNDATION FOR NEW MEXICO$3,000
Individual grant recipient$3,000
BREATH OF MY HEART BIRTHPLACE$2,000
AMERICAN HUMANE ASSOCIATION$2,000
COMMONWEALTH FOUNDATION$1,000
HARVARD LAMPOON TRUST$1,000
BRONXVILLE BEAUTIFICATION COUNCIL INC$1,000
BRONXVILLE HISTROCIAL CONSRVANCY$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY18–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 82% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%WILDLIFE CONSERVATION NETWORK: $4k → 10%THE BEREAVEMENT CENTER OF WESTCHESTER: $6k → 9%NY PUBLIC INTEREST RESEARCH GROUP: $3k → 17%SANTA FE PREP SCHOOL: $10k → 12%PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE: $5k → 14%BREATH OF MY HEART BIRTHPLACE: $2k → 18%AMIGOS BRAVOS INC: $3k → 18%SUNRISE CLINICS: $4k → 24%THE HUMANE SOCIETY OF THE: $2k → 14%THE CHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF MEMPHIS: $1k → 17%UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL: $25k → 13%UNSCA FOUNDATION: $33k → 15%PARTNERSHIP FOR PROVIDENCE PARKS: $3k → 14%THE BEREAVEMENT CENTER OF WESTCHESTER: $5k → 9%SANTA FE PREP SCHOOL: $10k → 12%KERES CHILDRENS LEARNING CENTER: $4k → 14%THE CULTURAL LANDSCAPE FOUNDATION: $13k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL: $17k → 13%UNSCA FOUNDATION: $30k → 15%PARTNERSHIP FOR PROVIDENCE PARKS: $3k → 14%COMMONWEALTH FOUNDATION: $5k → 16%THE BEREAVEMENT CENTER OF WESTCHESTER: $3k → 9%SANTA FE PREP SCHOOL: $10k → 12%NEW MEXICO WILD: $7k → 14%THE CULTURAL LANDSCAPE FOUNDATION: $2k → 14%UNSCA FOUNDATION: $27k → 15%PARTNERSHIP FOR PROVIDENCE PARKS: $3k → 14%COMMONWEALTH FOUNDATION: $1k → 16%SANTA FE PREP: $5k → 12%NEW MEXICO WILD: $3k → 14%AMERICAN HUMANE ASSOCIATION: $2k → 14%UNSCA FOUNDATION: $15k → 15%PARTNERSHIP FOR PROVIDENCE PARKS: $3k → 14%COMMONWEALTH FOUNDATION: $1k → 16%HARVARD LAMPOON TRUST: $17k → 9%CANCER FOUNDATION FOR NEW MEXICO: $4k → 12%UNSCA FOUNDATION: $15k → 15%PARTNERSHIP FOR PROVIDENCE PARKS: $3k → 14%HARVARD LAMPOON TRUST: $13k → 9%CANCER FOUNDATION FOR NEW MEXICO: $3k → 12%BATES COLLEGE SQUASH: $16k → 16%PARTNERSHIP FOR PROVIDENCE PARKS: $5k → 9%THE HORSE SHELTER: $3k → 12%BATES COLLEGE SQUASH: $5k → 16%PARTNERSHIP FOR PROVIDENCE PARKS: $5k → 9%THE BRONXVILLE SCHOOL FOUNDATION INC: $1k → 9%BRONXVILLE BEAUTIFICATION COUNCIL INC: $1k → 9%BRONXVILLE HISTROCIAL CONSRVANCY: $1k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MN
NY
MA
CT
RI
CA
NM
TN
NC
DC

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 5% of Harris J and Geraldine S Nelson Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

Harris J and Geraldine S Nelson Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 6.1% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$400k · 19 repeat orgs$46k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +28% since the first grant, against +27% for the ones you funded once.

19 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
9

Total granted

$400k
$26k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+28%
+27%

Still filing today

58%
56%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 73% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthArts & CulturePhilanthropyAnimalsCommunity ImprovementOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HL
    HARVARD LAMPOON TRUST
    6× · 2020–2025 · $55k · revenue +92%
  • LC
    LAWRENCE COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES
    4× · 2019–2022 · $15k · revenue +34%
  • CC
    COMMONWEALTH CORPORATION FOUNDATION
    4× · 2022–2025 · $7k · revenue +721%

Funded once

  • SF
    SANTA FE ART INSTITUTE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $8k · revenue +141%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $5k
  • PP
    PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE
    one grant, 2024 · $5k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New York Botanical Garden

The new york botanical garden is a museum of plants and a scientific research center devoted to the study of plants and their uses. it is the garden's mission to improve public understanding of the natural world, horticulture, and the…

Environment
2
American Museum of Natural History

The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."

Arts & Culture
3
The Brooklyn Institute of Arts and Sciences

The mission of the brooklyn institute of arts and sciences, d/b/a brooklyn museum (the "museum") is to bring people together through art and experiences that inspire celebration, compassion, courage, and the will to act. (see schedule o).

Arts & Culture
4
Brooklyn Bridge Park Corporation

Brooklyn bridge park corporation's mission, d/b/a brooklyn bridge park ("bbp") mission is to provide an exceptional public space that connects people, nature, and the waterfront, through inclusive, innovative, and sustainable management…

Recreation & Sports
5
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

6
Harvard Conservation Trust

To preserve the unique character and natural resources of harvard.

Environment
7
Isabella Stewart Gardner Museum Inc

Organization's mission statement true to the ambitious vision of its founder and her spirit of creative risk-taking, the mission of the isabella stewart gardner museum is: - to bring to life and preserve the rich historic collection; - to…

Arts & Culture
8
New York Landmarks Conservancy Inc

The conservancy preserves and revitalizes new york's architecture. by doing so, it contributes to new york's economy, tourism and quality of life.

9
Alliance for Flushing Meadows Corona Park Corporation

The mission of the alliance for flushing meadows corona park is to support nyc parks to preserve, maintain, and improve flushing meadows corona park for the benefit and use of the surrounding communities and all new yorkers.

Environment
10
Rose Fitzgerald Kennedy Greenway Conservancy Inc

See attached schedule othe conservancy has sole responsibility for managing all aspects of the rose kennedy greenway, including horticulture, programming, public art, maintenance, and capital improvements. we envision a vibrant, inclusive,…

Recreation & Sports
11
Bartlett Arboretum Association Inc

To cultivate and develop an expansive collection of trees, gardens, and plants for all to explore, enjoy and study; and to provide through education and stewardship, a greener, healthier, more beautiful environment.

Environment
12
Governors Island Corporation

The governors island corporation, doing business as the trust for governors island, is the 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization created by the city of new york and charged with the planning, redevelopment and ongoing operations of 150…

Animals

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Cultural Landscape Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Bronxville Beautification Council. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 29 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%0%<5yr14%5%5–10yr19%23%10–20yr16%32%20–35yr13%14%35–55yr16%27%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%3%5–10yr19%20%10–20yr16%27%20–35yr13%6%35–55yr16%45%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/24
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,541

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/23
Grantees still filing
14/23
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

UNSCA FOUNDATION — $119,000 · OtherUNSCA FOUNDATIONUNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL — $42,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILLSANTA FE PREP SCHOOL — $30,000 · OtherSANTA FE PREP SCHOOLHARVARD LAMPOON TRUST — $29,500 · OtherHARVARD LAMPOON TRUSTBATES COLLEGE SQUASH — $21,400 · OtherBATES COLLEGE SQUASHTHE BEREAVEMENT CENTER — $16,600 · OtherTHE BEREAVEMENT CENTERIndividual grant recipient — $10,250 · Other+9 more — $31,150 · Other+9 moreHARVARD LAMPOON TRUST — $55,000 · PhilanthropyHARVARD LAMPOON …COMMONWEALTH CORPORATION FOUNDATION — $7,250 · PhilanthropyCOMMONWEALTH COR…THE BRONXVILLE SCHOOL FOUNDATION INC — $2,750 · PhilanthropyLAWRENCE COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES — $14,500 · HealthCANCER FOUNDATION FOR NEW MEXICO — $6,500 · HealthSUNRISE CLINICS — $3,500 · HealthBREATH OF MY HEART BIRTH PLACE — $2,000 · HealthTHE CULTURAL LANDSCAPE FOUNDATION — $15,000 · Arts & CultureTHE CHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF MEMPHIS INC — $2,400 · Arts & CultureBronxville Historical Conservancy Inc — $1,000 · Arts & CulturePARTNERSHIP FOR PROVIDENCE PARKS — $13,500 · Recreation & SportsSANTA FE ART INSTITUTE INC — $8,000 · EducationKERES CHILDREN'S LEARNING CENTER — $4,000 · EducationPROPRIETORS OF THE BOSTON ATHENAEUM — $550 · EducationETHEL WALKER SCHOOL INC — $500 · Education+1 more — $400 · EducationWILDLIFE CONSERVATION NETWORK INC — $4,000 · AnimalsTHE HORSE SHELTER — $2,500 · AnimalsAMERICAN HUMANE ASSOCIATION — $2,000 · Animals
Other$299,900Philanthropy$65,000Health$26,500Arts & Culture$18,400Recreation & Sports$13,500Education$13,450Animals$8,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetHARVARD LAMPOON TRUST — $55,000 over 6y, 1.8% of budgetTHE CULTURAL LANDSCAPE FOUNDATION — $15,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetLAWRENCE COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES — $14,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetPARTNERSHIP FOR PROVIDENCE PARKS — $13,500 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetSANTA FE ART INSTITUTE INC — $8,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetCOMMONWEALTH CORPORATION FOUNDATION — $7,250 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetCANCER FOUNDATION FOR NEW MEXICO — $6,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetWILDLIFE CONSERVATION NETWORK INC — $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKERES CHILDREN'S LEARNING CENTER — $4,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSUNRISE CLINICS — $3,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BRONXVILLE SCHOOL FOUNDATION INC — $2,750 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetTHE HORSE SHELTER — $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE PUBLIC GARDEN INC — $2,400 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF MEMPHIS INC — $2,400 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBRONXVILLE BEAUTIFICATION COUNCIL — $2,250 over 4y, 1.8% of budgetAMERICAN HUMANE ASSOCIATION — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPROPRIETORS OF THE BOSTON ATHENAEUM — $550 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGRAMATAN VILLAGE INC — $500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetETHEL WALKER SCHOOL INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJOHN FITZGERALD KENNEDY LIBRARY FOUNDATION INCORPORATED — $400 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Santa Fe Community FoundationNM19.5× affinity7 shared granteesties to 6 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Santa Fe Community Foundation · Marilynn and John Hill Foundation Inc · Tracy Flanigan McVey Family Foundation · The Nagle Family Foundation · The Joan C and David L Henle Foundation · Esmond Nissim Foundation Inc Co Bosworth Gray & Fuller Esq · Marshall L and Perrine D McCune Charitable Foundation Inc · Amg Charitable Gift Foundation · The Chicago Community Trust · Jewish Communal Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Harris J and Geraldine S Nelson Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 1%
  • Friends of the Public Garden Inc1% of income from government
  • Proprietors of the Boston Athenaeum0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Harris J and Geraldine S Nelson Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Harris J and Geraldine S Nelson Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 35 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph