Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Murray Family Boy Scouts of Ame Boy Scouts of America

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$28k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$6k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Youth Development$94kPublic Benefit$81kCommunity Improvement$40kEnvironment$7kMembership Benefit$4kRecreation & Sports$4kHuman Services$4kCivil Rights$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,508
Median grant
8
States reached
$435k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NORTHERN STAR SCOUTING$5,662
MIDDLE TENNESSEE COUNCIL$4,797
SIMON KENTON COUNCIL$4,657
GREATER NEW YORK COUNCILS$3,518
CHESTER COUNTY COUNCIL$2,508
EAST CAROLINA COUNCIL$1,899
HIGH DESERT COUNCIL$1,814
PENNSYLVANIA DUTCH COUNCIL$1,557
COASTAL GEORGIA COUNCIL$1,122
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 64% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%MAYFLOWER COUNCIL: $5k → 11%MID-AMERICA COUNCIL BSA: $4k → 12%CORNHUSKER COUNCIL: $2k → 13%SNAKE RIVER COUNCIL: $3k → 11%NORTHERN STAR SCOUTING: $6k → 11%CHESTER COUNTY COUNCIL: $3k → 6%WASHINGTON CROSSING BSA: $3k → 6%LAUREL HIGHLANDS COUNCIL: $5k → 11%WEST LOS ANGELES: $4k → 14%GREATER NEW YORK COUNCILS: $4k → 17%CAPITAL AREA COUNCIL BSA: $5k → 10%HIGH DESERT COUNCIL: $2k → 14%BLUE RIDGE COUNCIL: $2k → 10%CENTRAL FLORIDA COUNCIL: $10k → 13%GREATER TAMPA BAY COUNCIL: $5k → 13%MID-IOWA COUNCIL: $4k → 10%GREATER ALABAMA COUNCIL: $4k → 7%QUIVIRA COUNCIL BSA: $2k → 16%GREAT RIVERS COUNCIL BSA: $2k → 17%GREATER ST LOUIS COUNCIL: $7k → 21%CASCADE PACIFIC COUNCIL BSA: $6k → 12%CONNECTICUT YANKEE COUNCIL: $5k → 12%MIDDLE TENNESSEE COUNCIL: $5k → 14%CHICKASAW COUNCIL: $3k → 17%DANIEL BOONE COUNCIL BSA: $2k → 12%EAST CAROLINA COUNCIL: $2k → 21%NORTHEAST GEORGIA COUNCIL: $4k → 7%ATLANTA AREA COUNCIL: $11k → 8%DENVER AREA COUNCIL BSA: $11k → 7%CROSSROADS OF AMERICA COUNCIL: $3k → 16%SIMON KENTON COUNCIL: $5k → 15%BLUE MOUNTAIN COUNCIL: $3k → 11%BUCKSKIN COUNCIL: $2k → 18%NORTHEAST ILLINOIS COUNCIL: $4k → 8%GARDEN STATE COUNCIL BSA: $4k → 7%HEART OF VIRGINIA COUNCIL: $4k → 9%BLUE RIDGE MTN COUNCIL BSA: $2k → 20%LAS VEGAS AREA COUNCIL BSA: $4k → 13%NATIONAL CAPITAL AREA COUNCIL BSA: $20k → 8%LINCOLN HERITAGE COUNCIL: $2k → 15%SNAKE RIVER COUNCIL: $2k → 11%WASHINGTON CROSSING BSA: $2k → 6%CAPITAL AREA COUNCIL BSA: $5k → 10%GREATER ST LOUIS COUNCIL: $6k → 21%CASCADE PACIFIC COUNCIL BSA: $6k → 12%ATLANTA AREA COUNCIL: $2k → 8%CROSSROADS OF AMERICA COUNCIL: $3k → 16%NATIONAL CAPITAL AREA COUNCIL BSA: $9k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
ID
MN
IL
WI
NY
MA
OR
NV
WY
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
CO
NE
MO
KY
WV
VA
MD
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

45%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$112k · 11 repeat orgs$137k to everyone else

11 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
52

Total granted

$112k
$110k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-22%
-14%

Still filing today

27%
10%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $28k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NC
    NATIONAL CAPITAL AREA COUNCIL BSA
    2× · 2019–2020 · $30k
  • GS
    GREATER ST LOUIS COUNCIL
    2× · 2022–2023 · $14k
  • BS
    Boy Scouts of America 92 Atlanta Area Council
    2× · 2021–2022 · $13k · revenue 0%

Funded once

  • CF
    CENTRAL FLORIDA COUNCIL
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
  • CY
    CONNECTICUT YANKEE COUNCIL
    one grant, 2022 · $5k
  • GT
    GREATER TAMPA BAY COUNCIL
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Central Mn Council of Boy Scouts of America

It is the mission of the boy scouts of america to prepare young people to make ethical choices over their lifetime by instilling in them the values of the scout law and oath.

—
2
Boy Scouts of America 388 Greater Hudson Valley Council

It is the mission of scouting america, greater hudson valley council, inc. to deliver the highest-quality, values-based youth program of character development and leadership training, based upon the precepts embodied in the scout oath and…

—
3
Suffolk County Council Boy Scouts of America

The mission is to prepare young people to make ethical and moral choices over their lifetimes by instilling in them the values of the scout oath and scout law.

Youth Development
4
Boy Scouts of America 571 Circle Ten Council

The purpose of circle ten council is to promote and extend scouting in northeast texas and southeast oklahoma. our goal is to provide all youth and adults with programs, training, and awards that build character, teach participatory…

Youth Development
5
Grand Canyon Council Inc Boy Scouts of America

The mission of scouting america is to prepare young people to make ethical and moral choices over their lifetimes by instilling in them the values of the scout oath and law. (continued on schedule o)programs of scouting america and grand…

—
6
Boy Scouts of America 624 Gateway Area Council

To prepare young people to make ethical choices over their lifetimes by instilling in them the values of the scout oath and law.

Youth Development
7
Hudson Valley Council Inc

The mission of the boy scouts of america is to prepare young people to make ethical and moral choices over their lifetimes by instilling in them the values of the scout oath and law.

—
8
Patriots' Path Council Inc Boy Scouts of America

Provide youth services through the execution of the charter of the national council boy scouts of america.

Youth Development
9
Scouting America Longhorn Council

Prepare young people to make ethical and moral choices over their lifetime by instilling in them the values of the scout oath and law.

—
10
Georgia-Carolina Council Boy Scouts of America Nc#93

To provide quality programs, facilities and opportunities that enable packs, troops, crews, and posts to deliver the full range of scouting experiences to every registered member. the mission of the boy scouts of america is to prepare…

—
11
Old North State Council Inc

The mission of the Boy Scouts of America is to prepare young people to make ethical choices over their lifetimes by instilling in them the values of the Scout Oath and Law.

Youth Development
12
Boy Scouts of America Tuscarora Council

To try and prepare young people to make ethical and moral choices over their lifetimes by instilling in them values of the scout oath and law.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Northern Star Council; the most unlike its peers is Heart of Virginia Council Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 72 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
2/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NATIONAL CAPITAL AREA COUNCIL BSA: $29,665 · OtherNATIONAL CAPITAL AREA COUNCIL BSAGREATER ST LOUIS COUNCIL: $13,846 · OtherGREATER ST LOUIS COUNCILDENVER AREA COUNCIL BSA: $12,026 · OtherCASCADE PACIFIC COUNCIL BSA: $11,244 · OtherCENTRAL FLORIDA COUNCIL: $10,077 · OtherCAPITAL AREA COUNCIL BSA: $9,088 · Other+63 more: $145,739 · Other+63 moreBoy Scouts of America 92 Atlanta Area Council: $12,866 · Youth DevelopmentGREATER NEW YORK COUNCILS BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $3,518 · Youth DevelopmentTHE PENNSYLVANIA DUTCH COUNCIL INC: $1,557 · Youth Development
Other$231,685Youth Development$17,941

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBoy Scouts of America 92 Atlanta Area Council: $12,866 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCROSSROADS OF AMERICA COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA INC: $6,726 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLAUREL HIGHLANDS COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $4,588 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLINCOLN HERITAGE COUNCIL OF BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA INC: $4,450 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHEART OF VIRGINIA COUNCIL INC: $3,740 over 1y, 4.2% of budgetTWIN VALLEY COUNCIL INC BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $860 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCONQUISTADOR COUNCIL BSA: $653 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNORTHEAST IOWA COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS: $604 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Boy Scouts of America 92 Atlanta Area Council ↗
  • Who funds CROSSROADS OF AMERICA COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds NORTHERN STAR COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds SIMON KENTON COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds LAUREL HIGHLANDS COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds LINCOLN HERITAGE COUNCIL OF BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds HEART OF VIRGINIA COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds GREATER NEW YORK COUNCILS BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

NRA Foundation IncVA16.7× affinity6 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: NRA Foundation Inc · Verizon Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Murray Family Boy Scouts of Ame Boy Scouts of America funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Murray Family Boy Scouts of Ame Boy Scouts of America. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Murray Family Boy Scouts of Ame Boy Scouts of America?

    Find your warmest path to The Murray Family Boy Scouts of Ame Boy Scouts of America through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 72 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Murray Family Boy Scouts of Ame Boy Scouts of America’s filings →

    More from the funding graph