Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Murray Family Boy Scouts of Ame Boy Scouts of America

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$28k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$6k
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 93% of THE MURRAY FAMILY BOY SCOUTS OF AME BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$2,508
Median grant
8
States reached
$435k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NORTHERN STAR SCOUTING$5,662
MIDDLE TENNESSEE COUNCIL$4,797
SIMON KENTON COUNCIL$4,657
GREATER NEW YORK COUNCILS$3,518
CHESTER COUNTY COUNCIL$2,508
EAST CAROLINA COUNCIL$1,899
HIGH DESERT COUNCIL$1,814
PENNSYLVANIA DUTCH COUNCIL$1,557
COASTAL GEORGIA COUNCIL$1,122
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 64% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%MAYFLOWER COUNCIL: $5k → 11%MID-AMERICA COUNCIL BSA: $4k → 12%CORNHUSKER COUNCIL: $2k → 13%SNAKE RIVER COUNCIL: $3k → 11%NORTHERN STAR SCOUTING: $6k → 11%CHESTER COUNTY COUNCIL: $3k → 6%WASHINGTON CROSSING BSA: $3k → 6%LAUREL HIGHLANDS COUNCIL: $5k → 11%WEST LOS ANGELES: $4k → 14%GREATER NEW YORK COUNCILS: $4k → 17%CAPITAL AREA COUNCIL BSA: $5k → 10%HIGH DESERT COUNCIL: $2k → 14%BLUE RIDGE COUNCIL: $2k → 10%CENTRAL FLORIDA COUNCIL: $10k → 13%GREATER TAMPA BAY COUNCIL: $5k → 13%MID-IOWA COUNCIL: $4k → 10%GREATER ALABAMA COUNCIL: $4k → 7%QUIVIRA COUNCIL BSA: $2k → 16%GREAT RIVERS COUNCIL BSA: $2k → 17%GREATER ST LOUIS COUNCIL: $7k → 21%CASCADE PACIFIC COUNCIL BSA: $6k → 12%CONNECTICUT YANKEE COUNCIL: $5k → 12%MIDDLE TENNESSEE COUNCIL: $5k → 14%CHICKASAW COUNCIL: $3k → 17%DANIEL BOONE COUNCIL BSA: $2k → 12%EAST CAROLINA COUNCIL: $2k → 21%NORTHEAST GEORGIA COUNCIL: $4k → 7%ATLANTA AREA COUNCIL: $11k → 8%DENVER AREA COUNCIL BSA: $11k → 7%CROSSROADS OF AMERICA COUNCIL: $3k → 16%SIMON KENTON COUNCIL: $5k → 15%BLUE MOUNTAIN COUNCIL: $3k → 11%BUCKSKIN COUNCIL: $2k → 18%NORTHEAST ILLINOIS COUNCIL: $4k → 8%GARDEN STATE COUNCIL BSA: $4k → 7%HEART OF VIRGINIA COUNCIL: $4k → 9%BLUE RIDGE MTN COUNCIL BSA: $2k → 20%LAS VEGAS AREA COUNCIL BSA: $4k → 13%NATIONAL CAPITAL AREA COUNCIL BSA: $20k → 8%LINCOLN HERITAGE COUNCIL: $2k → 15%SNAKE RIVER COUNCIL: $2k → 11%WASHINGTON CROSSING BSA: $2k → 6%CAPITAL AREA COUNCIL BSA: $5k → 10%GREATER ST LOUIS COUNCIL: $6k → 21%CASCADE PACIFIC COUNCIL BSA: $6k → 12%ATLANTA AREA COUNCIL: $2k → 8%CROSSROADS OF AMERICA COUNCIL: $3k → 16%NATIONAL CAPITAL AREA COUNCIL BSA: $9k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
ID
MN
IL
WI
NY
MA
OR
NV
WY
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
CO
NE
MO
KY
WV
VA
MD
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

45%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$112k · 11 repeat orgs$137k to everyone else

11 repeat relationships — 0 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
52

Total granted

$112k
$110k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-22%
-14%

Still filing today

27%
10%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $28k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NC
    NATIONAL CAPITAL AREA COUNCIL BSA
    2× · 2019–2020 · $30k
  • GS
    GREATER ST LOUIS COUNCIL
    2× · 2022–2023 · $14k
  • BS
    Boy Scouts of America 92 Atlanta Area Council
    2× · 2021–2022 · $13k · revenue 0%

Funded once

  • CF
    CENTRAL FLORIDA COUNCIL
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
  • CY
    CONNECTICUT YANKEE COUNCIL
    one grant, 2022 · $5k
  • GT
    GREATER TAMPA BAY COUNCIL
    one grant, 2023 · $5k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Central Mn Council of Boy Scouts of America

It is the mission of the boy scouts of america to prepare young people to make ethical choices over their lifetime by instilling in them the values of the scout law and oath.

2
Boy Scouts of America 388 Greater Hudson Valley Council

It is the mission of scouting america, greater hudson valley council, inc. to deliver the highest-quality, values-based youth program of character development and leadership training, based upon the precepts embodied in the scout oath and…

3
Suffolk County Council Boy Scouts of America

The mission is to prepare young people to make ethical and moral choices over their lifetimes by instilling in them the values of the scout oath and scout law.

Youth Development
4
Boy Scouts of America 571 Circle Ten Council

The purpose of circle ten council is to promote and extend scouting in northeast texas and southeast oklahoma. our goal is to provide all youth and adults with programs, training, and awards that build character, teach participatory…

Youth Development
5
Grand Canyon Council Inc Boy Scouts of America

The mission of scouting america is to prepare young people to make ethical and moral choices over their lifetimes by instilling in them the values of the scout oath and law. (continued on schedule o)programs of scouting america and grand…

6
Boy Scouts of America 624 Gateway Area Council

To prepare young people to make ethical choices over their lifetimes by instilling in them the values of the scout oath and law.

Youth Development
7
Hudson Valley Council Inc

The mission of the boy scouts of america is to prepare young people to make ethical and moral choices over their lifetimes by instilling in them the values of the scout oath and law.

8
Patriots' Path Council Inc Boy Scouts of America

Provide youth services through the execution of the charter of the national council boy scouts of america.

Youth Development
9
Scouting America Longhorn Council

Prepare young people to make ethical and moral choices over their lifetime by instilling in them the values of the scout oath and law.

10
Georgia-Carolina Council Boy Scouts of America Nc#93

To provide quality programs, facilities and opportunities that enable packs, troops, crews, and posts to deliver the full range of scouting experiences to every registered member. the mission of the boy scouts of america is to prepare…

11
Old North State Council Inc

The mission of the Boy Scouts of America is to prepare young people to make ethical choices over their lifetimes by instilling in them the values of the Scout Oath and Law.

Youth Development
12
Boy Scouts of America Tuscarora Council

To try and prepare young people to make ethical and moral choices over their lifetimes by instilling in them values of the scout oath and law.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Northern Star Council and the most unlike its peers is Heart of Virginia Council Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 72 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
2/13
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

NATIONAL CAPITAL AREA COUNCIL BSA — $29,665 · OtherNATIONAL CAPITAL AREA COUNCIL BSAGREATER ST LOUIS COUNCIL — $13,846 · OtherGREATER ST LOUIS COUNCILDENVER AREA COUNCIL BSA — $12,026 · OtherCASCADE PACIFIC COUNCIL BSA — $11,244 · OtherCENTRAL FLORIDA COUNCIL — $10,077 · OtherCAPITAL AREA COUNCIL BSA — $9,088 · Other+63 more — $145,739 · Other+63 moreBoy Scouts of America 92 Atlanta Area Council — $12,866 · Youth DevelopmentGREATER NEW YORK COUNCILS BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA — $3,518 · Youth DevelopmentTHE PENNSYLVANIA DUTCH COUNCIL INC — $1,557 · Youth Development
Other$231,685Youth Development$17,941

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetBoy Scouts of America 92 Atlanta Area Council — $12,866 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCROSSROADS OF AMERICA COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA INC — $6,726 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLAUREL HIGHLANDS COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA — $4,588 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLINCOLN HERITAGE COUNCIL OF BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA INC — $4,450 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHEART OF VIRGINIA COUNCIL INC — $3,740 over 1y, 4.2% of budgetTWIN VALLEY COUNCIL INC BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA — $860 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCONQUISTADOR COUNCIL BSA — $653 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNORTHEAST IOWA COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS — $604 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Boy Scouts of America 92 Atlanta Area Council
  • Who funds CROSSROADS OF AMERICA COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA INC
  • Who funds NORTHERN STAR COUNCIL
  • Who funds SIMON KENTON COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA
  • Who funds LAUREL HIGHLANDS COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA
  • Who funds LINCOLN HERITAGE COUNCIL OF BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA INC
  • Who funds HEART OF VIRGINIA COUNCIL INC
  • Who funds GREATER NEW YORK COUNCILS BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

NRA Foundation IncVA16.7× affinity6 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: NRA Foundation Inc · Verizon Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Murray Family Boy Scouts of Ame Boy Scouts of America funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
2021222324
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2024

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Murray Family Boy Scouts of Ame Boy Scouts of America?

    Find your warmest path to The Murray Family Boy Scouts of Ame Boy Scouts of America through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 72 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph