· Private foundation
The Moodys Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 28 grants below total $3,105,128 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $4,535,901 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $1,430,773 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k20 grants · $488k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $347k
- $250k+5 grants · $2.3M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| America Online Giving Foundation | $615,997 |
| World Wildlife Fund | $600,000 |
| WEconnect International Inc | $455,000 |
| The Theodore Roosevelt Sanctuary | $300,000 |
| Nest Inc | $300,000 |
| TechnoServe Inc | $200,000 |
| UK Online Giving Foundation | $96,503 |
| The Jocelyn Szeto Memorial Scholarship Fund | $50,000 |
| Women's College Hospital Foundation | $40,000 |
| Charities Aid Foundation | $38,114 |
| Community Foundation of Western North Carol | $35,000 |
| Canada Online Giving Foundation | $32,290 |
| Charitable Giving | $27,224 |
| Many Hopes, Inc | $25,000 |
| China Institute in America | $25,000 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
8 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 20 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $778k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- AOAmerica Online Giving Foundation2× · 2023–2024 · $1.3M
WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC2× · 2023–2024 · $1.2M · revenue -2%- WIWEConnect International Inc2× · 2023–2024 · $908k · revenue -4%
Funded once
- VIVILCAP INCgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $950k · revenue +53%
- WBWomen's Banking, Incone grant, 2023 · $300k
- CFCORPSGIVING FOUNDATIONone grant, 2023 · $200k · revenue +12%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.
Chief executives for corporate purpose (cecp) is the only business counsel and network dedicated to driving measurable returns on purpose. we promote responsible purpose-driven business as it increases customer loyalty, builds employee…
To engage and catalyze global seafood supply chains in rebuilding depleted fish stocks and reducing the environmental impacts of fishing and fish farming.
The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.
Educate/advocate for effective corporate governance and public company disclosure, strong shareholder rights and fair capital markets.
The center for international private enterprise (cipe) is a non-profit global organization that works to strengthen democracy and build competitive, resilient markets in many of the world's most challenging environments. working alongside…
The global impact investing network, inc. is dedicated to increasing the scale and effectiveness of impact investing to solve systemic problems facing people and the planet. impact investments are investments made into companies,…
Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…
The mission of women's world banking is to expand the economicassets, participation and power of low-income women and theirhouseholds by helping them access financial services, knowledge andmarkets. for more information, see schedule o.
Aacsb international provides quality assurance of business school programs, the latest in business education intelligence, thought leadership, and learning and development services.
Aca international contributes to the success of its members, the positive reputation of the industry and the health of the economy. we accomplish this by 1) being the comprehensive, knowledge-based resource for the credit and collection…
RA works at the intersection of business, agriculture & forests to improve lives & protect nature by transforming how land is used, production of goods & consumer choices.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Working in Support of Education Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Asia Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 42 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC ↗
- Who funds VILCAP INC ↗
- Who funds WEConnect International Inc ↗
- Who funds NEST INC ↗
- Who funds TECHNOSERVE INC ↗
- Who funds CORPSGIVING FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL CORPS ↗
- Who funds WORKING IN SUPPORT OF EDUCATION INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY SUNCOAST INC ↗
- Who funds THE ASIA SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds CHINA INSTITUTE IN AMERICA INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds HAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MANY HOPES INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN CAMPING ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds CHARLOTTE MECKLENBURG LIBRARY FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Silicon Valley Community Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.