Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Milton and Ruth Berman Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$199k
Granted FY2024still arriving
66
Grants FY2024still arriving
11
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$354kReligion$253kArts & Culture$135kInternational$80kHuman Services$67kAnimals$57kEducation$54kYouth Development$52kOther$0
02FY2024 · 66 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k59 grants · $85k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $114k
$1,000
Median grant
11
States reached
$2.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST JOHN'S HEALTH$25,000
DIDI HIRSCH MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES$25,000
TOMORROW'S WOMEN$20,250
ALVIN AILEY AMERICAN DANCE THEATER$14,000
LOS ANGELES JEWISH HEALTH$10,000
STEPHEN S WISE TEMPLE$10,000
TEMPLE AKIBA$10,000
THE RESEARCH FOUNDATION FOR SUNY$6,000
JEWISH BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF LA$5,000
JEWISH FEDERATION LOS ANGELES$5,000
KITT CRUSADERS INC$5,000
CONNECTING TO CURE CROHN'S & COLITIS$5,000
JVS SOCAL$3,000
Individual grant recipient$2,500
RETT SYNDROME RESEARCH INSTITUTE$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $53k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%BOYS REPUBLIC: $1k → 14%HAPPY TRAILS FOR KIDS: $5k → 14%SLICE OUT HUNGER: $2k → 17%SHOES FOR THE HOMELESS INC: $1k → 14%SHOES FOR THE HOMELESS INC: $1k → 14%SHOES FOR THE HOMELESS INC: $1k → 14%SHOES FOR THE HOMELESS INC: $1k → 14%SHOES FOR THE HOMELESS INC: $1k → 14%SHOES FOR THE HOMELESS INC: $1k → 14%SHOES FOR THE HOMELESS INC: $1k → 14%MYCHALS LEARNING PLACE: $1k → 14%SHOES FOR THE HOMELESS INC: $1k → 14%CITY OF ANGELS BALLET: $1k → 14%CITY OF ANGELS BALLET: $1k → 14%JUNIOR BLIND OF AMERICA: $1k → 14%WAYFINDER FAMILY SERVICES: $1k → 14%WAYFINDER FAMILY SERVICES: $1k → 14%WAYFINDER FAMILY SERVICES: $1k → 14%JUNIOR BLIND OF AMERICA: $1k → 14%WAYFINDER FAMILY SERVICES: $1k → 14%HOUSE OF RUTH: $1k → 14%HOUSE OF RUTH: $1k → 14%HOUSE OF RUTH: $1k → 14%LOS ANGELES HOUSE OF RUTH: $1k → 14%LOS ANGELES HOUSE OF RUTH: $1k → 14%THE MIDNIGHT MISSION: $1k → 14%THE MIDNIGHT MISSION: $1k → 14%FOOD ON FOOT: $1k → 14%FOOD ON FOOT: $1k → 14%LANGE FOUNDATION: $1k → 14%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF LOS ANGELES: $3k → 14%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF LOS ANGELES: $2k → 14%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF LOS ANGELES: $2k → 14%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF LOS ANGELES: $1k → 14%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF LOS ANGELES: $1k → 14%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF LOS ANGELES: $1k → 14%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF LOS ANGELES: $1k → 14%HOPE IN A SUITCASE: $1k → 14%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF LOS ANGELES: $1k → 14%HOPE IN A SUITCASE: $1k → 14%HOPE IN A SUITCASE: $1k → 14%HOPE IN A SUITCASE: $1k → 14%HOPE IN A SUITCASE: $1k → 14%HOPE IN A SUITCASE: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
MA
IA
OH
NJ
CA
MO
VA
MD
NM
AR
TN
DC
HI
OK
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.2M · 105 repeat orgs$114k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +49% since the first grant, against +46% for those funded once.

105 repeat relationships: 59 still active in FY2024, 46 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

105
38

Total granted

$1.2M
$70k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+49%
+46%

Still filing today

72%
47%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $44k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesEducationArts & CultureAnimalsYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DH
    DIDI HIRSCH PSYCHIATRIC SERVICE
    6× · 2017–2024 · $85k · revenue +81%
  • AA
    ALVIN AILEY DANCE FOUNDATION INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $79k · revenue +1%
  • CT
    Connecting to Cure Crohn's and Colitis Inc
    8× · 2017–2024 · $65k · revenue +49%

Funded once

  • TM
    THE MAYOR'S FUND FOR LOS ANGELES COVID RELIEF
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
  • SJ
    ST JOHN'S DONATION CENTER
    one grant, 2019 · $6k
  • AF
    ACLU FOUNDATION OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue -35%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Ucla Foundation

The ucla foundation is the giving, receiving, and investing arm of the ucla campus. the foundation enables private donors to help build, sustain and advance one of the world's finest academic and research institutions. private philanthropy…

Education
2
Altamed Health Services Corporation

To eliminate disparities in health care access and outcomes by providing superior quality health and human services through an integrated world-class delivery system for latino, multi-ethnic underserved communities in southern california.

Health
3
California Forward

Ca fwd drives action to identify solutions that can be taken to scale to meet the challenges the state is facing. the organization is driven by the belief that regional solutions across the state will help ensure economic, environmental,…

Public Benefit
4
Hollywood Food Coalition

Hollywood food coalition welcomes people to dinner each night. we rescue and redistribute food daily to other organizations. we care for our immediate community through our wellness program. we build community with and through our…

—
5
South Central Family Health Center

To improve the quality of life for the diverse communities we serve providing affordable and comprehensive healthcare and education in a welcoming multi-cultural environment.

Health
6
Los Angeles Area Chamber of Commerce

Chamber's mission: design and advance opportunities and solutions for a thriving regional economy that are inclusive and globally competitive. 1) advocacy - be a bold advocate for business as a driver of a strong economy that enables…

—
7
California Walks

Statewide voice for pedestrian safety and healthy, walkable communities for people of all ages and abilities. California Walks partners with state agencies, community-based organizations and residents.

Public Safety & Disaster
8
The San Diego Foundation

The san diego foundation inspires enduring philanthropy and enables community solutions to improve the quality of life in our region.

Philanthropy
9
The California Channel

To distribute public affairs and other educational information in order to create an electronic bridge between californians and their public officials, and, in the process educate a new generation of voting citizens and civic leaders who…

—
10
California Dental Association

The california dental association is committed to the success of our members in service to their patients and the public.

Community Improvement
11
League of California Community Foundations

The league of california community foundations promotes and strengthens community foundations in california. through collaboration and shared learning among member foundations and building partnerships with private and public entities, we…

Philanthropy
12
California Dental Association Foundation

The foundation's mission is to improve the oral health of all californians by supporting the dental profession and its efforts to meet community needs.

Science & Tech
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Casa of Los Angeles; the most unlike its peers is Kitt Crusaders Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

105 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 105 of the 153 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
25
Early backer (in before they grew)
101/105
Grantees still filing
76/105
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

STEPHEN S WISE TEMPLE: $96,000 · OtherSTEPHEN S WISE TEMPLETEMPLE AKIBA OF CULVER CITY: $95,150 · OtherTEMPLE AKIBA OF CULVER CITYTOMORROW'S WOMEN: $50,250 · OtherTOMORROW'S WOMENTEMPLE BETH AM: $44,423 · OtherTEMPLE BETH AMIndividual grant recipient: $30,220 · Other+85 more: $474,175 · Other+85 moreDIDI HIRSCH PSYCHIATRIC SERVICE: $84,500 · HealthDIDI HIRSCH PSYCHIAT…Connecting to Cure Crohn's and Colitis Inc: $64,500 · HealthConnecting to Cure C…PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $14,000 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD F…ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $10,000 · HealthBEAUTY BUS FOUNDATION: $8,500 · HealthSTARKLOFF DISABILITY INSTITUTE: $8,000 · Health+17 more: $48,250 · Health+17 moreALVIN AILEY DANCE FOUNDATION INC: $78,944 · Arts & CultureALVIN AILE…DANCE AND DIALOGUE: $11,000 · Arts & CultureDANCE AND …INNER-CITY ARTS: $11,000 · Arts & CultureINNER-CITY…Free Arts dba Free Arts for Abused Children: $6,000 · Arts & CultureSTREET SYMPHONY PROJECT INC: $6,000 · Arts & CultureSIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC: $4,000 · Arts & Culture+2 more: $3,000 · Arts & CultureJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF LOS ANGELES: $12,000 · Human ServicesSHOES FOR THE HOMELESS INC: $8,000 · Human ServicesHOPE IN A SUITCASE: $6,000 · Human ServicesWayfinder Family Services: $6,000 · Human ServicesHAPPY TRAILS FOR KIDS: $5,000 · Human ServicesHOUSE OF RUTH INC: $3,000 · Human ServicesTHE MIDNIGHT MISSION: $2,000 · Human ServicesLOS ANGELES HOUSE OF RUTH: $2,000 · Human ServicesCITY OF ANGELS BALLET: $2,000 · Human ServicesSlice Out Hunger Inc: $2,000 · Human ServicesFOOD ON FOOT: $2,000 · Human Services+3 more: $3,000 · Human ServicesKITT CRUSADERS INC: $32,500 · AnimalsTHE GENTLE BARN FOUNDATION: $11,000 · AnimalsOUTTA THE CAGE: $5,000 · AnimalsHUMANE SOCIETY OF VENTURA COUNTY: $2,000 · AnimalsPROJECT STREET VET: $2,000 · AnimalsTHE LIBRARY FOUNDATION OF LOS ANGELES: $11,000 · EducationREADING PARTNERS: $7,000 · EducationFIRST BOOK: $6,000 · EducationThe Research Foundation for The State University of New York: $6,000 · EducationSOUTHWESTERN LAW SCHOOL: $5,000 · EducationIDYLLWILD ARTS FOUNDATION: $3,000 · EducationTHE BOOK TRUCK INC: $2,000 · Education+2 more: $2,000 · EducationCASA OF LOS ANGELES: $13,000 · Civil RightsTREVOR PROJECT INC: $11,000 · Civil RightsACLU FOUNDATION OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $5,000 · Civil RightsANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $4,500 · Civil Rights
Other$790,218Health$237,750Arts & Culture$119,944Human Services$53,000Animals$52,500Education$42,000Civil Rights$33,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDIDI HIRSCH PSYCHIATRIC SERVICE: $84,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetALVIN AILEY DANCE FOUNDATION INC: $78,944 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetConnecting to Cure Crohn's and Colitis Inc: $64,500 over 8y, 3.5% of budgetTOMORROW'S WOMEN: $50,250 over 3y, 2.6% of budgetKITT CRUSADERS INC: $32,500 over 8y, 2.0% of budgetRow LA: $19,250 over 6y, 2.4% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $14,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetMending Kids International dba Mending Kids: $14,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetCASA OF LOS ANGELES: $13,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetMUSIC MENDS MINDS INC: $13,000 over 8y, 3.0% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF LOS ANGELES: $12,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetBeit T'Shuvah: $12,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetHOMEBOY INDUSTRIES: $11,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTREVOR PROJECT INC: $11,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetWestern Center on Law & Poverty Inc: $11,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetDANCE AND DIALOGUE: $11,000 over 6y, 1.2% of budgetTHE LIBRARY FOUNDATION OF LOS ANGELES: $11,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetINNER-CITY ARTS: $11,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetTHE GENTLE BARN FOUNDATION: $11,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $10,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetEL NIDO FAMILY CENTERS: $9,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $9,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTIKVAH-ETTA AND LAZEAR ISRAEL CENTER FOR THE DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLED: $9,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetHaven Hills Inc: $8,500 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetBEAUTY BUS FOUNDATION: $8,500 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetAFS INTERCULTURAL PROGRAMS INC: $8,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetSTARKLOFF DISABILITY INSTITUTE: $8,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetSHOES FOR THE HOMELESS INC: $8,000 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetNATIONAL EATING DISORDERS ASSOCIATION: $8,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION COUNCIL OF GREATER LA: $7,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetROOT & REBOUND: $7,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetLava Mae: $7,000 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetREADING PARTNERS: $7,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetJVS SOCAL: $6,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHOPE IN A SUITCASE: $6,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetFree Arts dba Free Arts for Abused Children: $6,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetImmigrant Defenders Law Center: $6,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetFIRST BOOK: $6,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTeach Democracy: $6,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetSTREET SYMPHONY PROJECT INC: $6,000 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetThe Research Foundation for The State University of New York: $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWayfinder Family Services: $6,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetEVERY MOTHER COUNTS: $6,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetDrawBridge: $6,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetHAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD FORWARD INC: $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBeyond Differences: $5,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetFAMILY HOUSE INC: $5,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DIDI HIRSCH PSYCHIATRIC SERVICE ↗
  • Who funds ALVIN AILEY DANCE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Connecting to Cure Crohn's and Colitis Inc ↗
  • Who funds TOMORROW'S WOMEN ↗
  • Who funds KITT CRUSADERS INC ↗
  • Who funds Row LA ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds Mending Kids International dba Mending Kids ↗
  • Who funds CASA OF LOS ANGELES ↗
  • Who funds MUSIC MENDS MINDS INC ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF LOS ANGELES ↗
  • Who funds Beit T'Shuvah ↗
  • Who funds HOMEBOY INDUSTRIES ↗
  • Who funds TREVOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds Western Center on Law & Poverty Inc ↗
  • Who funds DANCE AND DIALOGUE ↗
  • Who funds THE LIBRARY FOUNDATION OF LOS ANGELES ↗
  • Who funds INNER-CITY ARTS ↗
  • Who funds THE GENTLE BARN FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds EL NIDO FAMILY CENTERS ↗
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds TIKVAH-ETTA AND LAZEAR ISRAEL CENTER FOR THE DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLED ↗
  • Who funds Haven Hills Inc ↗
  • Who funds BEAUTY BUS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds AFS INTERCULTURAL PROGRAMS INC ↗
  • Who funds STARKLOFF DISABILITY INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds SHOES FOR THE HOMELESS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

California Community FoundationCA46.1× affinity32 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: California Community Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · The Annenberg Foundation · The Rose Hills Foundation · Weingart Foundation · The Ahmanson Foundation · Conrad N Hilton Foundation · The Green Foundation · Sempra Foundation · The Ralph M Parsons Foundation · Kayne Anderson Capital Advisors Foundation · Orange County Community Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Milton and Ruth Berman Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Milton and Ruth Berman Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 29%
  • Jazz House Kids Inc: 29% of income from government
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
26report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Milton and Ruth Berman Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Milton and Ruth Berman Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 153 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Milton and Ruth Berman Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph