Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Meyers Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$164k
Granted FY2025still arriving
32
Grants FY2025still arriving
12
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$353kScience & Tech$193kInternational$108kHealth$105kArts & Culture$78kPhilanthropy$67kCivil Rights$60kAnimals$45kOther$0
02FY2025 · 32 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k25 grants · $45k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $119k
$2,000
Median grant
12
States reached
$2.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY$20,000
AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE$20,000
JEWISH FEDERATION OF NORTH AMERICA$20,000
FRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH$20,000
FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES$19,000
WESTCHESTER REFORM TEMPLE$10,000
OUR LORD CHRIST KING CHURCH$10,000
AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEURORADIOLOGY$5,695
CINCINNATI ZOOLOGICAL GARDENS$5,000
Individual grant recipient$4,000
JEWISH CHILD CARE ASSOCIATION OF NY - JCCA$3,350
SOCIETY OF NEUROINTERVENTIONAL SURGERY FOUNDATION$3,275
PLANNED PARENTHOOD$3,000
CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT DOCUMENTARY$3,000
THIRTEEN WNET$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–23, $600) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%MIRIAM'S KITCHEN: $500 → 14%HIP HOP PUBLIC HEALTH: $100 → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
WA
ID
IL
MI
NY
MA
OR
OH
PA
CT
CA
CO
MO
VA
MD
AZ
DC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$929k · 46 repeat orgs$67k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +40% since the first grant, against +14% for those funded once.

46 repeat relationships: 26 still active in FY2025, 20 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

46
36

Total granted

$929k
$41k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+40%
+14%

Still filing today

72%
47%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalHealthEducationArts & CultureRecreation & SportsHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $240k · revenue +50%
  • AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE
    3× · 2023–2025 · $60k · revenue +44%
  • AS
    AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEURORADIOLOGY
    6× · 2017–2025 · $21k · revenue +118%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
  • The American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue +1%
  • CB
    CORAL BAY COMMUNITY COUNCILgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $3k · revenue +56%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Academy of Neurology

The Academy's mission is to enhance member career fulfillment and promote brain health for all.

Community Improvement
2
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
3
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
4
American College of Rheumatology Inc

The american college of rheumatology is an organization of and for physicians, health professionals, and scientists that advances rheumatology through programs of education, research, advocacy and practice support that foster excellence in…

—
5
Bar Ilan University in Israel Inc

Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.

—
6
American Association for the Advancement of Science

Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…

Science & Tech
7
University of Miami

See Form 990, Part I, Line 1, Description of Organization Mission.

Education
8
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
9
Association of American Medical Colleges

Aamc leads & serves the academic medicine community to improve the health of people everywhere.

Education
10
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
11
Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
12
American College of Radiology Association

The purpose of the association is the promotion of educational and professional association interests including but not limited to the promotion of the interests of radiology and the interests and study of the socioeconomic aspects of the…

Community Improvement
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Amnesty International of the Usa Inc; the most unlike its peers is Maya Gold Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

55 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 55 of the 91 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
55/55
Grantees still filing
43/55
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HARVARD COLLEGE FACULTY OF ART AND SCIENCES: $130,100 · OtherHARVARD COLLEGE FACULTY OF ART AND SCIENCESCINCINNATI ZOOLOGICAL GARDENS: $45,000 · OtherCINCINNATI ZOOLOGICAL GARDENSUNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI: $41,500 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATIIndividual grant recipient: $28,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientPLANNED PARENTHOOD: $22,000 · OtherAMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEURORADIOLOGY: $21,439 · OtherSOCIETY OF NEUROINTERVENTIONAL SURGERY FOUNDATION: $19,375 · Other+47 more: $164,257 · Other+47 moreCASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY: $240,100 · EducationCASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITYPresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $63,130 · EducationPresident and Fellows of Harvard Co…THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $50,000 · EducationTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY…+5 more: $21,500 · Education+5 moreFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES: $49,000 · InternationalFRIENDS OF…MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $12,500 · InternationalMEDECINS S…SEVA FOUNDATION: $11,500 · InternationalSEVA FOUND…HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL INC: $10,000 · InternationalHABITAT FO…International Rescue Committee INC: $8,500 · InternationalInternatio…AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL OF THE USA INC: $6,000 · InternationalAMNESTY IN…The American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc: $5,000 · International+4 more: $8,500 · International+4 moreFRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC: $50,000 · Arts & CultureTHE CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT DOCUMENTARY INC: $10,000 · Arts & CultureFRACTURED ATLAS INC: $9,000 · Arts & Culture+3 more: $3,262 · Arts & CultureTHE JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA INC: $60,000 · PhilanthropyAMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY FOUNDATION: $8,341 · PhilanthropyAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE: $60,000 · Civil RightsRadiological Society of North America Inc: $9,581 · HealthRonald McDonald House Global: $9,000 · HealthAmerican Heart Association Inc: $5,939 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $1,000 · Health+5 more: $1,706 · Health
Other$471,671Education$374,730International$111,000Arts & Culture$72,262Philanthropy$68,341Civil Rights$60,000Health$27,226

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY: $240,100 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $63,130 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA INC: $60,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE: $60,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $50,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC: $50,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES: $49,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEURORADIOLOGY: $21,439 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $15,030 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $12,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetSEVA FOUNDATION: $11,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL INC: $10,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT DOCUMENTARY INC: $10,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetRadiological Society of North America Inc: $9,581 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetNorthwestern University: $9,100 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SEVEN HILLS SCHOOL: $9,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetFRACTURED ATLAS INC: $9,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetRonald McDonald House Global: $9,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC: $8,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY FOUNDATION: $8,341 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetFeeding America: $7,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAMNESTY INTERNATIONAL OF THE USA INC: $6,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $5,939 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD BANK FOR NEW YORK CITY: $5,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetThe American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRESH AIR FUND: $5,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTRINITY COLLEGE: $4,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetGANNON UNIVERSITY: $4,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetSOCIETY OF NEUROINTERVENTIONAL SURGERY: $4,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetUniversity of Michigan: $4,500 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetCINCINNATI THERAPEUTIC RIDING AND HORSEM HORSEMANSHIP: $3,500 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetCORAL BAY COMMUNITY COUNCIL: $3,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $3,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetOXFAM-AMERICA INC: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetASPEN HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $2,037 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetABRAHAMIC REUNION INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetNEW YORK PUBLIC RADIO: $1,512 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNEW ISRAEL FUND: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSIERRA CLUB: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALPHA OMEGA ALPHA HONOR MEDICAL SOCIETY: $600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMadis House Inc: $550 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMIRIAM'S KITCHEN: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTONY BROOK FOUNDATION INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNIEKRO ANEURYSM AND AVM FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHARE OUR STRENGTH: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds President and Fellows of Harvard College ↗
  • Who funds THE JEWISH FEDERATIONS OF NORTH AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE ↗
  • Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEURORADIOLOGY ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds SEVA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT DOCUMENTARY INC ↗
  • Who funds Radiological Society of North America Inc ↗
  • Who funds Northwestern University ↗
  • Who funds THE SEVEN HILLS SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds FRACTURED ATLAS INC ↗
  • Who funds Ronald McDonald House Global ↗
  • Who funds International Rescue Committee INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Feeding America ↗
  • Who funds AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL OF THE USA INC ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds FOOD BANK FOR NEW YORK CITY ↗
  • Who funds The American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc ↗
  • Who funds FRESH AIR FUND ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Greater Cincinnati FoundationOH14.2× affinity5 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Greater Cincinnati Foundation · Ge Aerospace Foundation · Network for Good · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · American Endowment Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Meyers Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Meyers Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 6%
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College: 7% of income from government
  • The Center for Independent Documentary Inc: 6% of income from government
  • Trinity College: 0% of income from government
  • Oxfam-America Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Meyers Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Meyers Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 91 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Meyers’ filings →

More from the funding graph