Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Melanson Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$60k
Granted FY2025still arriving
20
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Education$197kHealth$163kFood & Nutrition$49kAnimals$32kHuman Services$22kYouth Development$21kReligion$21kPhilanthropy$20kOther$0
02FY2025 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k17 grants · $30k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $30k
$1,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FEEDING DREAMS$10,000
COMMUNITY SCHOOL OF NAPLES$10,000
NAPLES ZOO$10,000
MOUNT ST MARYS UNIVERSITY$5,000
SAMARITANS PURSE$5,000
IMMACUATE CONCEPTION SCHOOL$3,000
TUNNEL TO TOWERS$2,000
THE SAN CAROS SCHOOL$2,000
HOMEBOY INDUSTRIES$2,000
MARYMOUNT HIGH SCHOOL$1,000
ST JUDE CHILDREN HOSPITAL$1,000
ST TIMOTHY CATHOLIC CHURCH$1,000
ALZHEIMERS ASSOCIATION$1,000
CHURCH OF THE GOOD SHEPARD$1,000
PROVIDENCE HEALTH FOUNDATION$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–23, $54k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 15% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%LIVING LEARNING ENRICHMENT CENTER: $1k → 8%COLLABRIA CARE: $15k → 9%COLLABRIA CARE: $10k → 9%COLLABRIA CARE: $5k → 9%COLLABRIA CARE: $5k → 9%COLLABRIA CARE: $5k → 9%GOLDEN PAWS ASSISTANCE DOGS: $1k → 10%COLLABRIA CARE: $5k → 9%ST JOSEPH CENTER: $1k → 14%ST JOSEPH CENTER: $1k → 14%ST JOSEPH CENTER: $1k → 14%ST JOSEPH CENTER: $1k → 14%ST JOSEPH CENTER: $1k → 14%ST JOSEPH CENTER: $1k → 14%ST JOSEPH CENTER: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MI
NY
OR
NJ
CT
CA
CO
MD
AZ
TN
NC
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

80%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$460k · 37 repeat orgs$112k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +34% since the first grant, against +14% for the ones you funded once.

37 repeat relationships — 17 still active in FY2025, 20 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

37
30

Total granted

$460k
$108k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
+14%

Still filing today

43%
30%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesEducationAnimalsHousing & ShelterYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CC
    COLLABRIA CARE
    6× · 2017–2023 · $45k · revenue +40%
  • FD
    Feeding Dreams Inc
    4× · 2022–2025 · $40k · revenue +93%
  • OM
    ONE MIND
    4× · 2018–2021 · $40k · revenue +100%

Funded once

  • IO
    IMHRO ONE MIND SET
    one grant, 2017 · $20k
  • SC
    SWFL CHILDREN CHARITY
    one grant, 2024 · $10k
  • NC
    NAPA COMMUNITIES FIRE WISE FOUNDATI
    one grant, 2021 · $10k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
St Joseph's Hospital of Tampa Foundation Inc

St. joseph's hospitals foundation secures, manages and stewards philanthropic support to benefit the health care mission of st. joseph's hospital, st. joseph's women's hospital, st. joseph's children's hospital of tampa, st. joseph's…

Health
2
St Francis Hospital Foundation Inc

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

Health
3
St Charles Hospital Foundation

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

4
Good Samaritan Hospital Foundation

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

5
St Charles Hospital Corp

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

Health
6
St Catherine of Siena Medical Center

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

Health
7
Mercy Health

Mercy Health will provide assistance, support and direction to all of the health care institutions and activities operated and maintained by its Subsidiaries. The mission of Mercy Health in performing these activities shall be to provide a…

8
Wsnchs North Inc

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

Health
9
SantaFe Healthcare Inc

The mission of santafe healthcare, inc. is to serve as the not-for-profit system parent for its family of not-for-profit, mission-driven, affiliate organizations. see schedule o for continuation of the organization's mission. santafe…

Health
10
Good Samaritan Hospital Medical Center

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christs healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

Health
11
Saratoga Care Inc

To serve the people of the Saratoga region by providing them access to excellence in healthcare in a supportive and caring environment.

Health
12
Hospice of the Florida Keys Inc

To enable individuals to remain in their homes by supporting compassionate, effective, life-enhancing health and supportive services. at this time, hfk care corporation is inactive.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Saint John's Health Center Foundation and the most unlike its peers is The Bloom Project. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyFood Pantries & AssistanceIndependent K-8 SchoolsVeteran Support ServicesAffordable Housing Developm…Community Arts OrganizationsDevelopmental Disabilities …Cancer Support OrganizationsAnimal Rescue and AdoptionHospice Care ServicesCommunity Health Centers
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 47 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number24%0%<5yr15%3%5–10yr20%13%10–20yr17%17%20–35yr11%23%35–55yr13%43%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value24%0%<5yr15%0%5–10yr20%30%10–20yr17%32%20–35yr11%16%35–55yr13%22%55yr+

The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/34
the rest of the field
14%
26,003/186,944

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 70 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
26/27
Grantees still filing
20/27
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

LOYOLA HIGH SCHOOL — $57,000 · OtherLOYOLA HIGH SCHOOLMT ST MARY'S UNIVERSITY — $40,000 · OtherMT ST MARY'S UNIVERSITYIMHRO ONE MIND SET — $20,000 · OtherIMHRO ONE MIND SETCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF COLLIER COU — $20,000 · OtherCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF COLLIER COUIMMACULATE CONCEPTION SCHOOL — $15,000 · OtherMOUNT ST MARYS UNIVERSITY — $15,000 · Other+48 more — $171,500 · Other+48 moreONE MIND — $40,000 · HealthONE MINDST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $5,000 · HealthST JUDE CH…SAINT JOHN'S HEALTH CENTER FOUNDATION — $5,000 · HealthSAINT JOHN…PIH Health Good Samaritan Hospital — $3,000 · HealthPIH Health…CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION — $2,000 · HealthCOLLABRIA CARE — $45,000 · Human ServicesCOLLABRIA …ST JOSEPH CENTER — $7,000 · Human ServicesST JOSEPH …+2 more — $2,000 · Human ServicesFeeding Dreams Inc — $40,000 · Food & NutritionCOMMUNITY SCHOOL OF NAPLES INC — $20,000 · EducationPRAGER UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $10,000 · EducationSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION — $6,000 · EducationNAPLES ZOO INC — $30,000 · Animals+1 more — $1,000 · AnimalsHOMEBOY INDUSTRIES — $17,000 · Youth Development
Other$338,500Health$55,000Human Services$54,000Food & Nutrition$40,000Education$36,000Animals$31,000Youth Development$17,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCOLLABRIA CARE — $45,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetFeeding Dreams Inc — $40,000 over 4y, 1.5% of budgetONE MIND — $40,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetNAPLES ZOO INC — $30,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY SCHOOL OF NAPLES INC — $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHOMEBOY INDUSTRIES — $17,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetPRAGER UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE — $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSt Francis Center — $7,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetST JOSEPH CENTER — $7,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION — $6,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $5,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetKNIGHTS OF COLUMBUS — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHabitat for Humanity of Collier County Inc — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAINT JOHN'S HEALTH CENTER FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAINT ANN SCHOOL FOUNDATION INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetThe Bloom Project — $4,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetPIH Health Good Samaritan Hospital — $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNAPLES HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC — $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWESTERN LOS ANGELES COUNTY COUNCIL INC BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA 51 — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGolden PAWS Assistance Dogs Inc — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMARIN HUMANE SOCIETY — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BELVEDERE COVE FOUNDATION — $1,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetLIVING & LEARNING ENRICHMENT CENTER — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLAGUNA BEACH GARDEN CLUB — $500 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetST JAMES INN — $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds COLLABRIA CARE
  • Who funds Feeding Dreams Inc
  • Who funds ONE MIND
  • Who funds NAPLES ZOO INC
  • Who funds COMMUNITY SCHOOL OF NAPLES INC
  • Who funds HOMEBOY INDUSTRIES
  • Who funds PRAGER UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE
  • Who funds St Francis Center
  • Who funds ST JOSEPH CENTER
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
  • Who funds KNIGHTS OF COLUMBUS
  • Who funds Habitat for Humanity of Collier County Inc
  • Who funds SAINT JOHN'S HEALTH CENTER FOUNDATION
  • Who funds SAINT ANN SCHOOL FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds The Bloom Project
  • Who funds PIH Health Good Samaritan Hospital
  • Who funds NAPLES HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC
  • Who funds WESTERN LOS ANGELES COUNTY COUNCIL INC BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA 51

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Carrie Estelle Doheny FoundationCA15.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Carrie Estelle Doheny Foundation · Collier Community Foundation Inc · California Community Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Klm Foundation · Catholic Community Foundation of Los Angeles · The Ahmanson Foundation · Arthur J Gallagher Foundation · The Bessemer Giving Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Melanson Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 70%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    7get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 70 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph