Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Medlin-Hale Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$121k
Granted FY2024still arriving
35
Grants FY2024still arriving
8
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What you fund
0198% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202024.

Arts & Culture$231kReligion$93kEnvironment$46kRecreation & Sports$36kCommunity Improvement$35kHealth$32kHuman Services$30kInternational$15kOther$0
02FY2024 · 35 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k33 grants · $81k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $40k
$1,500
Median grant
8
States reached
$2.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GEORGE WASHINGTON'S MOUNT VERNON$20,000
ALL SAINTS' EPISCOPAL CHURCH$20,000
NEW AMERICAN PATHWAYS$8,000
ATLANTA SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA$6,000
COMMUNITIES OF COASTAL GEORGIA FOUNDATION$6,000
AUBURN UNIVERSITY$5,000
ATLANTA MEMORIAL PARK CONSERVANCY$5,000
GEORGE WASHINGTON'S MOUNT VERNON$5,000
CHATTAHOOCHEE RIVERKEEPER$5,000
OPPORTUNITY INTERNATIONAL$5,000
OLD SALEM$4,000
ATLANTA BELTLINE PARTNERSHIP$3,261
GPB$3,000
SOUTHERN ENVIRONMENTAL LAW CENTER$3,000
WABE$2,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $28k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%NEW AMERICAN PATHWAYS: $8k → 14%NEW AMERICAN PATHWAYS: $5k → 14%NEW AMERICAN PATHWAYS: $5k → 14%NEW AMERICAN PATHWAYS: $5k → 14%RESPITE CARE ATLANTA: $1k → 13%RESPITE CARE ATLANTA: $500 → 13%RESPITE CARE ATLANTA: $500 → 13%RESPITE CARE ATLANTA: $250 → 13%RESPITE CARE ATLANTA: $250 → 13%FAMILIES FIRST: $1k → 13%FAMILIES FIRST: $1k → 13%FAMILIES FIRST: $500 → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

VT
WA
IL
NY
MA
PA
CA
VA
TN
NC
DC
AL
GA

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 16% of The Medlin-Hale Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 61% of the giving stays in GA; read by stated purpose it is 59% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

The Medlin-Hale Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$494k · 41 repeat orgs$64k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +35% since the first grant, against +34% for the ones you funded once.

41 repeat relationships — 29 still active in FY2024, 12 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

41
21

Total granted

$494k
$54k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+35%
+34%

Still filing today

66%
48%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureEnvironmentEducationInternationalHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • THE MOUNT VERNON LADIES' ASSOCIATION OF THE UNION
    4× · 2021–2024 · $160k · revenue +13%
  • NA
    NEW AMERICAN PATHWAYS INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $23k · revenue +167%
  • CR
    CHATTAHOOCHEE RIVERKEEPER INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $19k · revenue +35%

Funded once

  • SA
    SWEET AUBURN WORKSgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $25k · revenue +34%
  • CC
    Christian City Inc
    one grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue -38%
  • FR
    FIRST REPHIDIM MISSIONARY BAPTIST CHURCH
    one grant, 2023 · $4k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The South Fork Conservancy Incorporated

The mission of the South Fork Conservancy is to restore and preserve habitat along the tributaries of Peachtree Creek. We give the community access to these healthy, restored greenspaces by designing, building and maintaining nature trails.

Environment
2
Friends of Ga State Parks & Histori

The mission of friends is to partner with, promote and preserve georgia state parks & historic sites. statewide, friends works to raise awareness of the economic and intrinsic values of georgia's greatest treasures. we work with state and…

Human Services
3
Tenngreen Land Conservancy

The organization's primary mission is conserving land where people and nature can thrive by creating green corridors linking existing public lands using conservation easments and outright purchase.

Recreation & Sports
4
Atlantic Coast Conservancy Inc

The mission of the atlantic coast conservancy is to provide 21st century solutions and sound scientific applications for conservation of critical natural resources in the face of a changing climate, focusing on the southeasthern united…

Environment
5
African Parks Foundation of America

To engage the united states and its citizens in the work of african parks and to promote access to american experience and expertise in the african parks actiities by 1) raising funds for specific projects, activities, training, equipment…

Recreation & Sports
6
Rainforest Trust

Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.

International
7
Three Rivers Land Trust Inc

Protect and conserve land, natural areas, rural landscapes, family farms and historic places within north carolina's heartland

Environment
8
Fernbank Inc

Fernbank museum of natural history inspires a lifelong learning of natural history through immersive programming and unmatched experiences to encourage a greater appreciation of our planet and its inhabitants. fernbank is dedicated to…

Arts & Culture
9
Chastain Park Conservancy Inc

The Conservancy's mission is to restore, enhance, maintain and preserve Chastain Park through the implementation of its 20-year Master Plan. With one eye on Chastain Park's glorious past and another on its promising future, the Conservancy…

Recreation & Sports
10
The Georgia Center for Nonprofits

Our mission is to create thriving communities by helping nonprofits succeed. our work revolves around four primary areas of focus.1. we are a hub for social innovation 2. we are a capacity accelerator for organizations and their people3.…

Community Improvement
11
Dunwoody Nature Center Inc

Inspires the love of nature and cultivates environmental understanding and stewardship by: (1)Conserving and enhancing Dunwoody Park (2)Educating children, families and adults of all ages about the natural world and our place in…

Environment
12
Piedmont Park Conservancy Inc

To enhance and preserve Piedmont Park as a vital, urban green space and as a cultural and recreational resource that enriches the quality of life for all Atlantans.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Trees Atlanta Inc and the most unlike its peers is South River Watershed Alliance. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyLocal History MuseumsCommunity FoundationsChristian Youth CampsSenior Support ServicesPublic Library OperationsIndependent K-12 SchoolsCommunity Arts CentersEnvironmental Conservation …Pregnancy Support ServicesCommunity Foundations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 37 years old; the field is 11. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number28%5%<5yr17%8%5–10yr20%10%10–20yr14%23%20–35yr9%35%35–55yr13%20%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value28%9%<5yr17%2%5–10yr20%4%10–20yr14%19%20–35yr9%61%35–55yr13%6%55yr+

The field is 28% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 9% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 19% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/46
the rest of the field
19%
10,947/58,255

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

43 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 43 of the 68 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
12
Early backer (in before they grew)
42/43
Grantees still filing
27/43
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ALL SAINTS EPISCOPAL CHURCH — $82,000 · OtherALL SAINTS EPISCOPAL CHURCHHistoric Oakland Foundation Inc — $27,000 · OtherHistoric Oakland Foundation IncSOUTHERN ENVIRONMENTAL LAW CENTER — $10,000 · OtherCAMP SUNSHINE INC — $9,900 · OtherGEORGE WEST MENTAL HEALTH FOUNDATION INC — $12,500 · Other+40 more — $99,560 · Other+40 moreTHE MOUNT VERNON LADIES' ASSOCIATION OF THE UNION — $160,000 · Arts & CultureTHE MOUNT VERNON LADIES' ASSOCIATION…GEORGIA TRUST FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION INC — $7,300 · Arts & CulturePARTNERS FOR SACRED PLACES INC — $7,000 · Arts & Culture+3 more — $8,261 · Arts & CultureATLANTA MEMORIAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC — $30,900 · Recreation & SportsPARK PRIDE INC — $5,000 · Recreation & SportsCHATTAHOOCHEE RIVERKEEPER INC — $19,000 · EnvironmentTHE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND — $4,500 · EnvironmentGEORGIA CONSERVANCY INC — $3,500 · EnvironmentTREES ATLANTA INC — $3,500 · EnvironmentBirds Georgia Corporation — $2,500 · Environment+1 more — $200 · EnvironmentNEW AMERICAN PATHWAYS INC — $23,000 · Human ServicesRESPITE CARE ATLANTA INC — $2,500 · Human ServicesFAMILIES FIRST INC — $2,500 · Human ServicesSWEET AUBURN WORKS — $25,000 · Community ImprovementGROVE PARK FOUNDATION INC — $1,000 · Community ImprovementOPPORTUNITY INTERNATIONAL INC D/B/A OPPORTUNITY INTERNATIONAL-US — $11,000 · InternationalMEDSHARE INTERNATIONAL INC — $3,042 · InternationalWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $3,031 · International+1 more — $500 · International
Other$240,960Arts & Culture$182,561Recreation & Sports$35,900Environment$33,200Human Services$28,000Community Improvement$26,000International$17,573

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE MOUNT VERNON LADIES' ASSOCIATION OF THE UNION — $160,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetATLANTA MEMORIAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC — $30,900 over 3y, 9.9% of budgetHistoric Oakland Foundation Inc — $27,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetNEW AMERICAN PATHWAYS INC — $23,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCHATTAHOOCHEE RIVERKEEPER INC — $19,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetGEORGE WEST MENTAL HEALTH FOUNDATION INC — $12,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetOPPORTUNITY INTERNATIONAL INC D/B/A OPPORTUNITY INTERNATIONAL-US — $11,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHERN ENVIRONMENTAL LAW CENTER — $10,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCAMP SUNSHINE INC — $9,900 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetGEORGIA TRUST FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION INC — $7,300 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetPARTNERS FOR SACRED PLACES INC — $7,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITIES OF COASTAL GEORGIA FOUNDATION INC — $6,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetChristian City Inc — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPARK PRIDE INC — $5,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTHE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND — $4,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetOLD SALEM INC — $4,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPATH INC — $4,000 over 4y, 3.2% of budgetGEORGIA CONSERVANCY INC — $3,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTREES ATLANTA INC — $3,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetATLANTA BELTLINE PARTNERSHIP INC — $3,261 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEDSHARE INTERNATIONAL INC — $3,042 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $3,031 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPROJECT HORSESHOE FARM — $3,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetRESPITE CARE ATLANTA INC — $2,500 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetTHE OSSABAW ISLAND FOUNDATIONINC — $2,500 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetFAMILIES FIRST INC — $2,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBirds Georgia Corporation — $2,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetWESLEY WOODS INC — $2,250 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetATLANTA-FULTON PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION INC — $1,950 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetGROVE PARK FOUNDATION INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGEORGIA WILDLIFE FEDERATION — $1,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTHE BOYCE L ANSLEY SCHOOL INC — $1,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFORWARD ARTS FOUNDATION INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE DREAM PROGRAM INC — $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MCCALLIE SCHOOL — $750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetU S-UKRAINE FOUNDATION — $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEW SECTOR ALLIANCE INC — $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE LONG NOW FOUNDATION — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetREFLECTION RIDING ARBORETUM AND NATURE CENTER — $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE MOUNT VERNON LADIES' ASSOCIATION OF THE UNION
  • Who funds ATLANTA MEMORIAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC
  • Who funds Historic Oakland Foundation Inc
  • Who funds SWEET AUBURN WORKS
  • Who funds NEW AMERICAN PATHWAYS INC
  • Who funds CHATTAHOOCHEE RIVERKEEPER INC
  • Who funds GEORGE WEST MENTAL HEALTH FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds OPPORTUNITY INTERNATIONAL INC D/B/A OPPORTUNITY INTERNATIONAL-US
  • Who funds SOUTHERN ENVIRONMENTAL LAW CENTER
  • Who funds CAMP SUNSHINE INC
  • Who funds GEORGIA TRUST FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION INC
  • Who funds PARTNERS FOR SACRED PLACES INC
  • Who funds COMMUNITIES OF COASTAL GEORGIA FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds Christian City Inc
  • Who funds PARK PRIDE INC
  • Who funds THE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND
  • Who funds OLD SALEM INC
  • Who funds PATH INC
  • Who funds GEORGIA CONSERVANCY INC
  • Who funds TREES ATLANTA INC
  • Who funds ATLANTA BELTLINE PARTNERSHIP INC
  • Who funds MEDSHARE INTERNATIONAL INC
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC
  • Who funds PROJECT HORSESHOE FARM
  • Who funds RESPITE CARE ATLANTA INC
  • Who funds THE OSSABAW ISLAND FOUNDATIONINC
  • Who funds FAMILIES FIRST INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundation for Greater Atlanta IncGA32.7× affinity16 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation for Greater Atlanta Inc · The Sartain Lanier Family Foundation Inc · Georgia Power Foundation Inc · Tull Charitable Foundation Inc · Tw Marian W Ottley Atlanta Main · The Imlay Foundation Inc · The 2492 Fund Howell · The Davis Foundation · The Kelin Foundation · Thalia & Michael C Carlos Foundation In · The Zeist Foundation Inc · The Waterfall Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Medlin-Hale Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 100%
  • The Dream Program Inc100% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
13report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 68 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph