· Private foundation
The Zeist Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k20 grants · $630k
- $50k–250k53 grants · $4.4M
- $250k+16 grants · $11M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| EMORY UNIVERSITY | $1,550,000 |
| WHITEFOORD INC | $1,525,000 |
| WYLDE CENTER THE | $1,230,000 |
| COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR GREATER ATLANTA | $1,021,000 |
| ATLANTA SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA | $725,000 |
| HIGH MUSEUM OF ART | $600,000 |
| FERNBANK MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY THE | $600,000 |
| ATLANTA BRAVES FOUNDATION | $500,000 |
| CHILDREN'S HEALTHCARE OF ATLANTA | $500,000 |
| RONALD MC DONALD HOUSE CHARITIES | $500,000 |
| BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF METRO ATLANTA | $408,333 |
| ATLANTA HISTORY CENTER | $350,000 |
| CHRIS 180 | $333,335 |
| ATLANTA SPEECH SCHOOL | $300,000 |
| ROBERT W WOODRUFF ARTS CENTER | $250,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $5.0M) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 91% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +34% since the first grant, against +29% for the ones you funded once.
117 repeat relationships — 69 still active in FY2024, 48 since wound down; 17 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2.0M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- RWROBERT W WOODRUFF ARTS CENTER INC5× · 2020–2024 · $2.2M · revenue +62%
- WCWYLDE CENTER INC5× · 2020–2024 · $2.1M · revenue +172% · 85% of their budget
- FIFernbank Inc5× · 2020–2024 · $1.8M · revenue +87%
Funded once
- HFHABITAT FOR HUMANITY IN ATLANTA INCone grant, 2023 · $250k · revenue -4%
- PPPARK PRIDE INCgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $200k · revenue +170%
- TLTHE LOVETT SCHOOL INCgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $200k · revenue +34%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
ACP is a group committed to identifying and providing leadership on selected issues important to driving the economic development of the city of Atlanta and for which the ACP's active involvement will make a major difference. The ACP has a…
It is the mission of leadership atlanta to build a better community for everyone in the atlanta region through education about the key issues facing the region and inspiring members and others to take on and exercise real leadership…
The corporation is a voluntary association of individuals and organizations the purposes of which are to upgrade and advance the atlanta metropolitan area in population, commerce and finance; to effect civic and social improvements; to…
Girls on the Run Georgia empowers girls with vital social-emotional skills to help them succeed in school, at home, and within friendships. Our programs, Girls on the Run (3rd-5th grade) and Heart & Sole (6th-8th grade) are taught by…
Georgia Center for Opportunity GCO is an independent, non-partisan think tank dedicated to increasing opportunity and improving the quality of life for all Georgians.
The mission of the Cobb Collaborative is to convene community stakeholders to facilitate the sharing of ideas, expertise and resources to meet needs and resolve issues in Cobb County. The vision is that all individuals, families, and…
Provides mediation services and mediation training for all manner of disputes, private and public, without the need for formal audication through the court system.
Redefined atlanta engages communities, advocates for equity, and funds critical work to drive systemic level improvement in k-12 public education for students and families.
To provide education, networking opportunities, advocacy and professional industry information to the american institute of architects' atlanta chapter members.
Our mission is to give every student the individual attention they need to succeed. this is at the core of everything we do. atlanta academy teaches children from pre-k through eighth grade.
To make kids better today and healthier tomorrow.
Supporting people with special needs to lead fulfilled lives.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Atlanta Children's Shelter Incorporated and the most unlike its peers is Corners Outreach Llc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 28 years old; the field is 10. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 31% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 22% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
133 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 133 of the 168 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR GREATER ATLANTA INC ↗
- Who funds DEKALB MEDICAL CENTER ↗
- Who funds ROBERT W WOODRUFF ARTS CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds WYLDE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds Fernbank Inc ↗
- Who funds Atlanta Speech School Inc ↗
- Who funds THE SHELTERING ARMS INC ↗
- Who funds FEEDING GEORGIA INC ↗
- Who funds YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF METROPOLITAN ATLANTA (1361) ↗
- Who funds ATLANTA UNION MISSION CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds Boys & Girls Clubs of Metro Atlanta Inc ↗
- Who funds OUR HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds ATLANTA COMMUNITY FOOD BANK INC ↗
- Who funds CHRIS 180 INC ↗
- Who funds QUALITY CARE FOR CHILDREN INC ↗
- Who funds ATLANTA HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL CENTER FOR CIVIL AND HUMAN RIGHTS INC ↗
- Who funds Atlanta Braves Foundation ↗
- Who funds BREAKTHROUGH ATLANTA ↗
- Who funds URBAN RECIPE INC ↗
- Who funds MERCY CARE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds WHOLESOME WAVE GEORGIA INC ↗
- Who funds Agape Community Center ↗
- Who funds CAMP TWIN LAKES INC ↗
- Who funds GEORGIA ORGANICS INC ↗
- Who funds THE GIVING KITCHEN INITIATIVE INC ↗
- Who funds FOOD WELL ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds VOICES FOR GEORGIA'S CHILDREN INC ↗
- Who funds BLOOM OUR YOUTH INC ↗
- Who funds BUCKHEAD CHRISTIAN MINISTRY INC ↗
- Who funds 3DE NATIONAL LLC ↗
- Who funds DUKE UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds COVENANT HOUSE GEORGIA INC ↗
- Who funds ACHIEVE ATLANTA INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Community Foundation for Greater Atlanta Inc · The Imlay Foundation Inc · Georgia Power Foundation Inc · Tull Charitable Foundation Inc · The Sartain Lanier Family Foundation Inc · United Way of Greater Atlanta Inc · The Waterfall Foundation Inc · The Arthur M Blank Family Foundation · AEC Trust · Tw Marian W Ottley Atlanta Main · Atl Fdn-W Peters Main · Betty and Davis Fitzgerald Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Zeist Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.